{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T02:16:29Z","timestamp":1790907389146,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":149,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,1]],"date-time":"2011-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1301616000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,1]],"date-time":"2011-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1301616000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,8]],"date-time":"2011-01-08T04:12:20Z","timestamp":1294459940000},"page":"288-300","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":354,"title":["Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"204","author":[{"given":"Francesc","family":"Figueras","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jason","family":"Gardosi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.009","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction","volume":"18","author":"Kady","year":"2004","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1250","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01827.x","article-title":"Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: population-based case-control study","volume":"115","author":"Jacobsson","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(93)91224-A","article-title":"Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life","volume":"341","author":"Barker","year":"1993","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07895.x","article-title":"An audit of the detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies","volume":"93","author":"Hepburn","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14263.x","article-title":"Effectiveness of antenatal care: a population based study","volume":"100","author":"Backe","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.001","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: new standards for assessing adverse outcome","volume":"23","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91342-6","article-title":"Customised antenatal growth charts","volume":"339","author":"Gardosi","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.019","article-title":"One size does not fit all","volume":"197","author":"Resnik","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.035","article-title":"A customized standard to assess fetal growth in an American population","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2007.00698.x","article-title":"A customized birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian population","volume":"47","author":"Mongelli","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib12","first-page":"830","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards","volume":"108","author":"Clausson","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.816","article-title":"Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study","volume":"194","author":"Ego","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F277","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2006.108621","article-title":"Customized birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity","volume":"92","author":"Figueras","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.034","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with smallness for gestational age by customised and population based birthweight percentiles","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00656.x","article-title":"Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity","volume":"112","author":"McCowan","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.11010039.x","article-title":"Fetal weight gain in a serially scanned high-risk population","volume":"11","author":"de Jong","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.06050340.x","article-title":"Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low-risk population","volume":"6","author":"Mongelli","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539502000426","article-title":"Ultrasound biometry and fetal growth restriction","volume":"13","author":"Gardosi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600720071","article-title":"An investigation into the applicability of customised charts for the assessment of fetal growth in antenatal population at Blackburn, Lancashire, United Kingdom","volume":"26","author":"Dua","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2009.003","article-title":"Growth deficit in term small-for-gestational fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler is associated with adverse outcome","volume":"37","author":"Illa","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38629.587639.7C","article-title":"Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study","volume":"331","author":"Gardosi","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.098","article-title":"Identifying the causes of stillbirth: a comparison of four classification systems","volume":"199","author":"Vergani","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2007.07.003","article-title":"A placental cause of intra-uterine fetal death depends on the perinatal mortality classification system used","volume":"29","author":"Korteweg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90466-2","article-title":"Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"172","author":"Alfirevic","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1806","article-title":"Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?","volume":"25","author":"Lindqvist","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.813","article-title":"Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension and intrauterine growth restriction, related or independent conditions?","volume":"194","author":"Villar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90561-8","article-title":"Antepartum surveillance for a history of stillbirth: when to begin?","volume":"172","author":"Weeks","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90414-4","article-title":"The significance of a previous stillbirth","volume":"151","author":"Freeman","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05020114.x","article-title":"Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?","volume":"5","author":"Stratton","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994059","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes among women with and without diabetic microvascular disease (White's classes B to FR) versus non-diabetic controls","volume":"15","author":"Reece","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00420-3","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and long-term follow-up associated with modern management of diabetic nephropathy","volume":"87","author":"Gordon","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.00975.x","article-title":"Customised birthweight centiles are useful for identifying small-for-gestational-age babies in women with type 2 diabetes","volume":"49","author":"Rowan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1996.15.4.301","article-title":"Comparison of umbilical Doppler velocimetry, nonstress testing, and biophysical profile in pregnancies complicated by diabetes","volume":"15","author":"Bracero","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999395","article-title":"Uteroplacental Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis correlates poorly with glycemic control in diabetic pregnant women","volume":"8","author":"Kofinas","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1994.13.2.73","article-title":"Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy and the assessment of umbilical artery waveforms using pulsed Doppler ultrasonography","volume":"13","author":"Reece","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199801153380302","article-title":"Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"338","author":"Cnattingius","year":"1998","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1750","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcn\/87.6.1750","article-title":"Combined associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy","volume":"87","author":"Nohr","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Clin Nutr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02245.x","article-title":"The value of customized centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size","volume":"116","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01249.x","article-title":"The effect of body mass index on three methods of fetal weight estimation","volume":"109","author":"Farrell","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x","article-title":"Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study","volume":"115","author":"Hack","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib43","first-page":"1006","article-title":"Outcome of twin pregnancies according to intrapair birth weight differences","volume":"94","author":"Hollier","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01361.x","article-title":"The creation of twin centile curves for size","volume":"109","author":"Ong","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.06050349.x","article-title":"Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in multiple pregnancies","volume":"6","author":"Lynch","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib46","first-page":"553","article-title":"A standard for normal fetal growth in twin pregnancy","volume":"180","author":"Gardosi","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00051.x","article-title":"Prediction of discordant twins by real-time ultrasonography combined with umbilical artery velocimetry","volume":"15","author":"Chittacharoen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02066.x","article-title":"The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy","volume":"110","author":"Giles","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.052","article-title":"First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: a population-based screening study (the FASTER Trial)","volume":"191","author":"Dugoff","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1762","DOI":"10.1210\/jcem.87.4.8430","article-title":"Early pregnancy levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein a and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth, preeclampsia, and stillbirth","volume":"87","author":"Smith","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Clin Endocrinol Metab"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib51","first-page":"257","article-title":"Extremely high maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels at second-trimester screening","volume":"78","author":"Killam","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1354","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.278","article-title":"Association between second-trimester isolated high maternal serum maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels and obstetric complications in singleton and twin pregnancies","volume":"188","author":"Lepage","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00382.x","article-title":"Improved early prediction of pre-eclampsia by combining second-trimester maternal serum inhibin-A and uterine artery Doppler","volume":"17","author":"Aquilina","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.810611.x","article-title":"Is mid-trimester maternal serum inhibin-A a marker of preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction?","volume":"81","author":"D'Anna","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.365","article-title":"Mid-trimester triple test levels in early and late onset severe pre-eclampsia","volume":"22","author":"Shenhav","year":"2002","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1549","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114864","article-title":"The association of abnormal alpha-fetoprotein and adverse pregnancy outcome: does increased fetal surveillance affect pregnancy outcome?","volume":"184","author":"Huerta-Enochian","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1292","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91373-4","article-title":"The effect of low-dose aspirin on pregnancies complicated by elevated human chorionic gonadotropin levels","volume":"173","author":"Wenstrom","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39129.637917.AE","article-title":"Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study","volume":"334","author":"Bukowski","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1817","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199812173392504","article-title":"First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight","volume":"339","author":"Smith","year":"1998","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318187d034","article-title":"Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome","volume":"112","author":"Pedersen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00572.x","article-title":"Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation","volume":"18","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00594.x","article-title":"Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation","volume":"18","author":"Martin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7621","article-title":"Maternal plasma soluble endoglin at 11-13 weeks' gestation in pre-eclampsia","volume":"35","author":"Foidart","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.127977","article-title":"First-trimester prediction of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy","volume":"53","author":"Poon","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004659.pub2","article-title":"Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications","author":"Duley","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib66","first-page":"826","article-title":"Usefulness of aspirin therapy in high-risk pregnant women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler ultrasound at 14-16 weeks pregnancy: randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"46","author":"Ebrashy","year":"2005","journal-title":"Croat Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib67","first-page":"161","article-title":"Low dose acetylsalicylic acid in prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in women with bilateral uterine artery notches","volume":"109","author":"Vainio","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib69","first-page":"341","article-title":"Audit of fundal height measurement plotted on customised growth charts","volume":"16","author":"Wright","year":"2006","journal-title":"MIDIRS Midwifery Digest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(78)90824-4","article-title":"Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height","volume":"131","author":"Belizan","year":"1978","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348409155527","article-title":"Symphysis-fundus measurements and intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"63","author":"Cnattingius","year":"1984","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(91)90291-C","article-title":"Altered fetal growth: antenatal diagnosis by symphysis-fundal height in India and comparison with Western charts","volume":"35","author":"Grover","year":"1991","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347709154978","article-title":"Gravidogram and fetal growth","volume":"56","author":"Westin","year":"1977","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.4.5732.404","article-title":"Fallacy of the fundal height","volume":"4","author":"Beazley","year":"1970","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16237.x","article-title":"The implications of introducing the symphyseal-fundal height-measurement","volume":"97","author":"Lindhard","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07894.x","article-title":"Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height","volume":"93","author":"Persson","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1985.tb00614.x","article-title":"Evaluation of fundal height measurement in antenatal care","volume":"25","author":"Rogers","year":"1985","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03634.x","article-title":"Measurement of fundal height as a screening test for fetal growth retardation","volume":"89","author":"Rosenberg","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.004","article-title":"Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement","volume":"23","author":"Morse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib80","first-page":"591","article-title":"Symphysis-fundus height and pregnancy characteristics in ultrasound-dated pregnancies","volume":"94","author":"Mongelli","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08267.x","article-title":"Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts","volume":"106","author":"Gardosi","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(84)90492-6","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy","volume":"2","author":"Bakketeig","year":"1984","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70347-2","article-title":"Receiver-operator characteristic curves for the ultrasonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in low-risk pregnancies","volume":"174","author":"David","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02113.x","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial in a hospital population of ultrasound measurement screening for the small for dates baby","volume":"33","author":"Duff","year":"1993","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00147.x","article-title":"Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the \u2018Alesund\u2019 randomized controlled trial","volume":"15","author":"Eik-Nes","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90396-O","article-title":"An evaluation of the efficacy of Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis as a screening test in pregnancy","volume":"162","author":"Newnham","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1991.10.3.153","article-title":"Evaluation of early third-trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"10","author":"Skovron","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70329-9","article-title":"A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight","volume":"170","author":"Hedriana","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib90","first-page":"626","article-title":"A randomized trial using ultrasound to identify the high-risk fetus in a low-risk population","volume":"101","author":"McKenna","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199309163291201","article-title":"Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome","volume":"329","author":"Ewigman","year":"1993","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.289.6453.1179","article-title":"Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial","volume":"289","author":"Neilson","year":"1984","journal-title":"Br Med J Clin Res Ed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Newnham JP, Evans SF, Michael CA, Stanley FJ, Landau LI. Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 19939;342:887-91.","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(93)91944-H"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1641","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6588.1641","article-title":"Third trimester placental grading by ultrasonography as a test of fetal wellbeing","volume":"294","author":"Proud","year":"1987","journal-title":"Br Med J Clin Res Ed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001451.pub3","article-title":"Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation)","author":"Bricker","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1154","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00649.x","article-title":"Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: a population-based study","volume":"84","author":"Sylvan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34094-4","article-title":"Routine versus indicated third trimester ultrasound: is a randomized trial feasible?","volume":"31","author":"Le Ray","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01277.x","article-title":"The association between customised small for gestational age infants and pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension varies with gestation at delivery","volume":"114","author":"Groom","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib99","first-page":"1030","article-title":"Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best?","volume":"80","author":"Chang","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5386","article-title":"Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"32","author":"Turan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.014","article-title":"Placental angiogenic growth factors and uterine artery Doppler findings for characterization of different subsets in preeclampsia and in isolated intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"195","author":"Crispi","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116686","article-title":"Fetal umbilical cord oxygen values and birth to placental weight ratio in relation to size at birth","volume":"185","author":"Lackman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib104","first-page":"601","article-title":"Clinical practice guidelines","volume":"25","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib105","first-page":"269","article-title":"Utility of antepartum umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"59","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1055","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90783-7","article-title":"Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep","volume":"161","author":"Morrow","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-5629(90)90167-B","article-title":"Doppler waveform pulsatility index and resistance, pressure and flow in the umbilical placental circulation: an investigation using a mathematical model","volume":"16","author":"Thompson","year":"1990","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib108","article-title":"Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies","author":"Neilson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11092.x","article-title":"Umbilical artery Doppler studies in small for gestational age babies reflect disease severity","volume":"107","author":"McCowan","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01670.x","article-title":"Predictiveness of antenatal umbilical artery Doppler for adverse pregnancy outcome in small-for-gestational-age babies according to customised birthweight centiles: population-based study","volume":"115","author":"Figueras","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70285-3","article-title":"Absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: risk of neonatal morbidity and brain damage","volume":"170","author":"Valcamonico","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14265.x","article-title":"Prediction of morbidity in small and normally grown fetuses by fetal heart rate variability, biophysical profile score and umbilical artery Doppler studies","volume":"100","author":"Soothill","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13040225.x","article-title":"Small for gestational age is not a diagnosis","volume":"13","author":"Soothill","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1460","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)00408-5","article-title":"Fetal growth velocity: a cautionary tale","volume":"353","author":"Bobrow","year":"1999","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116749","article-title":"Perinatal correlates and neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at term gestation","volume":"185","author":"Doctor","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00652.x","article-title":"Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"19","author":"Severi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02057.x","article-title":"Uterine and umbilical artery Doppler are comparable in predicting perinatal outcome of growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"116","author":"Ghosh","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127137","article-title":"Prognostic value of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses delivered near term","volume":"187","author":"Vergani","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00079.x","article-title":"Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"15","author":"Hershkovitz","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6249","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental outcome in 2-year-old infants who were small-for-gestational age term fetuses with cerebral blood flow redistribution","volume":"32","author":"Eixarch","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","article-title":"Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"79","author":"Gramellini","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited","volume":"21","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib124","article-title":"Plasma volume expansion for suspected impaired fetal growth","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib125","article-title":"Betamimetics for suspected impaired fetal growth","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709022043","article-title":"The effect of bedrest in hospital on fetal outcome in pregnancies complicated by intra-uterine growth retardation","volume":"66","author":"Laurin","year":"1987","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib127","article-title":"Maternal oxygen administration for suspected impaired fetal growth","author":"Say","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2002.00627.x","article-title":"Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus","volume":"19","author":"Ferrazzi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000187540.37795.3a","article-title":"Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"106","author":"Cosmi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x","article-title":"Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study","volume":"18","author":"Hecher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00591.x","article-title":"The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens","volume":"18","author":"Baschat","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib132","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70393-5","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: a meta-analysis","volume":"181","author":"Chauhan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90161-2","article-title":"Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: relationship with fetal blood gases","volume":"173","author":"Hecher","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1914","article-title":"Qualitative venous Doppler flow waveform analysis in preterm intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses with ARED flow in the umbilical artery\u2014correlation with short-term outcome","volume":"25","author":"Schwarze","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.149","article-title":"Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"22","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib136","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75","article-title":"Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction","volume":"109","author":"Baschat","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib137","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.965","article-title":"Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"23","author":"Bilardo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib138","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2657","article-title":"Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results","volume":"27","author":"Baschat","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(79)90406-X","article-title":"Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I","volume":"133","author":"Evertson","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib140","article-title":"Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment","author":"Pattison","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib141","first-page":"673","article-title":"Short-term fetal heart rate variation, decelerations, and umbilical flow velocity waveforms before labor","volume":"80","author":"Dawes","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70118-3","article-title":"Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of nonstress test results in a randomized controlled trial","volume":"181","author":"Bracero","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib143","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70479-X","article-title":"Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. VIII","volume":"178","author":"Manning","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib144","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6286","article-title":"Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters","volume":"33","author":"Baschat","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90002-Z","article-title":"Fetal biophysical profile score. VI","volume":"169","author":"Manning","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib146","first-page":"1573","article-title":"Biophysical profile and its relation to fetal blood gas level obtained by cordocentesis","volume":"43","author":"Okamura","year":"1991","journal-title":"Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib147","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70305-8","article-title":"The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s","volume":"174","author":"Miller","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib148","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.074","article-title":"Biophysical profile in the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses who weigh <1000 g","volume":"199","author":"Kaur","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib149","article-title":"Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2657","article-title":"Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results","volume":"27","author":"Baschat","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib151","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2657","article-title":"Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results","volume":"27","author":"Turan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib152","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"Fa90","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2010.189761.4","article-title":"Accuracy of birthweight prediction through adjustment for individual maternal and pregnancy characteristics","volume":"95","author":"Francis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib153","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055_bib154","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)17821-0","article-title":"GRIT: concern about external validity","volume":"365","author":"Gardosi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937810011105?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937810011105?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:40:09Z","timestamp":1757587209000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937810011105"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,4]]},"references-count":149,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937810011105"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}