{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T02:47:47Z","timestamp":1790650067018,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":76,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1309478400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,24]],"date-time":"2011-02-24T08:43:46Z","timestamp":1298537026000},"page":"19-27","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":96,"title":["Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"205","author":[{"given":"Kerri S.","family":"Bevis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph R.","family":"Biggio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib1","series-title":"SEER cancer statistics review","year":"1975"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib2","first-page":"48","article-title":"An evaluation of the National Cervical Screening Programe Otago site","volume":"113","author":"Coppell","year":"2000","journal-title":"N Z Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.050","article-title":"2006 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ","volume":"197","author":"Wright","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00326-X","article-title":"Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnancy","volume":"72","author":"Althuisius","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.104209","article-title":"The effects of loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical length: implications for pregnancy","volume":"182","author":"Gentry","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1325","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10986.x","article-title":"Loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ) as an outpatient method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"104","author":"Ljubojevic","year":"1997","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1246","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91487-0","article-title":"The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience","volume":"172","author":"Ferenczy","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(91)90782-K","article-title":"Pregnancy after cervical loop diathermy","volume":"337","author":"Bigrigg","year":"1991","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90622-X","article-title":"Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia","volume":"166","author":"Keijser","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619209015508","article-title":"Obstetric outcome after surgical surgery for intra-epithelial neoplasia","volume":"12","author":"Gunasekera","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619309151709","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the transformation zone","volume":"13","author":"Tarrant","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199811000-00001","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix","volume":"92","author":"Mitchell","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib13","article-title":"Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","author":"Martin-Hirsch","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ctrv.2006.07.008","article-title":"The up-to-date evidence on colposcopy practice and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the Cochrane colposcopy & cervical cytopathology collaborative group (C5 group) approach","volume":"32","author":"Kyrgiou","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cancer Treat Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1993.1168","article-title":"A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy","volume":"50","author":"Oyesanya","year":"1993","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1994.1189","article-title":"A randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife cone, laser, and LEEP","volume":"54","author":"Mathevet","year":"1994","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1994.1027","article-title":"Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"52","author":"Alvarez","year":"1994","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70200-0","article-title":"Cold knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized prospective study","volume":"180","author":"Duggan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1994.1281","article-title":"LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold knife conization","volume":"55","author":"Nauman","year":"1994","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(99)00162-9","article-title":"Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions","volume":"68","author":"Nuovo","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.12.028","article-title":"Cancer free survival after CIN treatment: comparisons of treatment methods and histology","volume":"105","author":"Kalliala","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2048","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.21604","article-title":"Long-term risk of invasive cervical cancer after treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"118","author":"Soutter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01277.x","article-title":"Loop diathermy excision compared with cervical laser vaporisation for the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"109","author":"Dey","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib24","first-page":"265","article-title":"Conization of the cervix","volume":"67","author":"Miller","year":"1938","journal-title":"Surg Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00483.x","article-title":"Pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix","volume":"81","author":"McLaren","year":"1974","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11237.x","article-title":"The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study","volume":"86","author":"Jones","year":"1979","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347909154045","article-title":"Pregnancy complications following conization of the uterine cervix (I)","volume":"58","author":"Weber","year":"1979","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347909154594","article-title":"Pregnancy complications following conization of the uterine cervix (II)","volume":"58","author":"Weber","year":"1979","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(82)90088-0","article-title":"Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy: a case-control study","volume":"14","author":"Ludviksson","year":"1982","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.04.003","article-title":"Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix","volume":"103","author":"Klaritsch","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib31","first-page":"1005","article-title":"Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization","volume":"81","author":"Kristensen","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib32","first-page":"207","article-title":"Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome","volume":"93","author":"El-Bastawissi","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01107.x","article-title":"Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth","volume":"114","author":"Bruinsma","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68181-6","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"367","author":"Kyrgiou","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"a1284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a1284","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis","volume":"337","author":"Arbyn","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348209156537","article-title":"Does cervix conization increase the risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies?","volume":"61","author":"Moinian","year":"1982","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90752-9","article-title":"Pregnancy following cervical conization","volume":"142","author":"Buller","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348209156591","article-title":"Outcome of pregnancy after conization","volume":"61","author":"Larsson","year":"1982","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02133858","article-title":"Pregnancy and delivery after cone biopsy of the cervix","volume":"237","author":"Kuoppala","year":"1986","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14261.x","article-title":"The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervix","volume":"100","author":"Hagen","year":"1993","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2100","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.291.17.2100","article-title":"Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery","volume":"291","author":"Sadler","year":"2004","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)01986-H","article-title":"Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix","volume":"58","author":"Sagot","year":"1995","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00489-4","article-title":"Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height","volume":"90","author":"Raio","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349609033306","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"75","author":"Forsmo","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1080\/11038120701208158","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study","volume":"86","author":"Sjoborg","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701279145","article-title":"Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery","volume":"86","author":"N\u00f8hr","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000151991.09124.bb","article-title":"The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome","volume":"105","author":"Samson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.02.004","article-title":"Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period","volume":"201","author":"Noehr","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b1377b","article-title":"Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and risk for spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies","volume":"114","author":"Noehr","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b052de","article-title":"Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth","volume":"114","author":"Jakobsson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02437.x","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital","volume":"117","author":"Van de Vijver","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02438.x","article-title":"After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increase in subsequent pregnancy","volume":"117","author":"Ortoft","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"a1343","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a1343","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conization: population based cohort study","volume":"337","author":"Albrechtsen","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11319.x","article-title":"Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone","volume":"102","author":"Cruickshank","year":"1995","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90633-T","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone","volume":"169","author":"Blomfield","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-005-0727-1","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"272","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b5cba3","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"114","author":"Shanbhag","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d068a3","article-title":"Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth","volume":"115","author":"Werner","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib59","first-page":"1058","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review","volume":"102","author":"Crane","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.2002.6650","article-title":"Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer","volume":"86","author":"Paraskevaidis","year":"2002","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1999.780414.x","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix","volume":"78","author":"van Rooijen","year":"1999","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00237-L","article-title":"The fertility of women after cervical laser surgery","volume":"86","author":"Spitzer","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000253239.87040.23","article-title":"Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"109","author":"Jakobsson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2000-13448","article-title":"Infection and preterm birth","volume":"17","author":"Andrews","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1500","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200005183422007","article-title":"Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery","volume":"342","author":"Goldenberg","year":"2000","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib66","first-page":"196","article-title":"Preterm labor: emerging role of genital tract infections","volume":"4","author":"Andrews","year":"1995","journal-title":"Infect Agents Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123034","article-title":"Antimicrobial factors in the cervical mucus plug","volume":"187","author":"Hein","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00525.x","article-title":"Immunoglobulin levels and phagocytes in the cervical mucus plug at term pregnancy","volume":"84","author":"Hein","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1159\/000292695","article-title":"Studies on repair of the uterine cervix after CO2 laser conization with anti-keratin monoclonal antibodies","volume":"35","author":"Miyalo","year":"1993","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000192169.44775.76","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"107","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.087","article-title":"Prior cone biopsy: prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound","volume":"191","author":"Berghella","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(95)02432-C","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of cervical shortening after loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ)","volume":"50","author":"Ricciotti","year":"1995","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2","article-title":"Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"114","author":"Noehr","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(80)90556-6","article-title":"Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size","volume":"136","author":"Leiman","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000251497.55065.74","article-title":"Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth","volume":"109","author":"Himes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1409","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c6f8a4","article-title":"Cervical cytology screening","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937811000044?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937811000044?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:42:23Z","timestamp":1757587343000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937811000044"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"references-count":76,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937811000044"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}