{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T06:13:28Z","timestamp":1780467208229,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,1]],"date-time":"2014-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1391212800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,1]],"date-time":"2014-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1391212800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,23]],"date-time":"2013-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1382486400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,18]],"date-time":"2013-10-18T12:16:13Z","timestamp":1382098573000},"page":"157.e1-157.e6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":149,"title":["Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in\u00a0vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"210","author":[{"given":"Eric J.","family":"Forman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kathleen H.","family":"Hong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jason M.","family":"Franasiak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"suffix":"Jr.","given":"Richard T.","family":"Scott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg081","article-title":"Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting","volume":"18","author":"Land","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib2","series-title":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2009 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh176","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer","volume":"19","author":"Murray","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr003","article-title":"Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs","volume":"17","author":"Mastenbroek","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039","article-title":"Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial","volume":"100","author":"Scott","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1093\/molehr\/gaq037","article-title":"SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts","volume":"16","author":"Northrop","year":"2010","journal-title":"Mol Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.01.115","article-title":"Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening","volume":"97","author":"Treff","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2017","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.01.052","article-title":"Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays","volume":"94","author":"Treff","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"870","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.01.104","article-title":"Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study","volume":"97","author":"Scott","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035","article-title":"Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in\u00a0vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"100","author":"Scott","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056","article-title":"In\u00a0vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"100","author":"Forman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib12","first-page":"CD003416","article-title":"Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection","volume":"2","author":"Pandian","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259316.04136.30","article-title":"Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop","volume":"109","author":"Reddy","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003","article-title":"The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"94","author":"Gelbaya","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa053524","article-title":"In\u00a0vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos","volume":"354","author":"Papanikolaou","year":"2006","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023","article-title":"Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"81","author":"Gardner","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)81442-2","article-title":"Is the obstetric outcome of in\u00a0vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study","volume":"67","author":"Reubinoff","year":"1997","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9781-3","article-title":"Characteristics of chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed after spontaneous abortions in an infertile population","volume":"29","author":"Werner","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2008.08.015","article-title":"Chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages after different assisted reproduction procedures","volume":"29","author":"Bettio","year":"2008","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2175","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1203382","article-title":"Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis","volume":"367","author":"Wapner","year":"2012","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937813010818?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937813010818?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:56:37Z","timestamp":1757588197000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937813010818"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937813010818"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in\u00a0vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.016","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Mosby, Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}