{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T23:00:23Z","timestamp":1792623623034,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":119,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,1]],"date-time":"2014-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1393632000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,1]],"date-time":"2014-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1393632000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,22]],"date-time":"2014-02-22T00:46:11Z","timestamp":1393029971000},"page":"179-193","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":964,"title":["Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"210","author":[{"given":"Aaron B.","family":"Caughey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alison G.","family":"Cahill","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeanne-Marie","family":"Guise","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dwight J.","family":"Rouse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2012-3769","article-title":"Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011","volume":"131","author":"Hamilton","year":"2013","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1285829","article-title":"Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits?","volume":"29","author":"Gregory","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib3","series-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence report\/technology assessment no. 191. AHRQ publication no. 10-E003","author":"Guise","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.007","article-title":"Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery","volume":"199","author":"Clark","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1822","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.14.1822","article-title":"Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial; term breech trial 3-month follow-up collaborative group","volume":"287","author":"Hannah","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.004","article-title":"Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial; term breech trial collaborative group","volume":"191","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.060870","article-title":"Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term: maternal health study group of the Canadian perinatal surveillance system","volume":"176","author":"Liu","year":"2007","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries: National Institute of\u00a0Child Health and Human Development maternal-fetal medicine units network","volume":"107","author":"Silver","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.035","article-title":"Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review","volume":"205","author":"Marshall","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1779","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)14896-9","article-title":"Cesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy","volume":"362","author":"Smith","year":"2003","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.553695","article-title":"The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality","volume":"24","author":"Solheim","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2012.1030","article-title":"Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals: reducing variation may address quality and cost issues","volume":"32","author":"Kozhimannil","year":"2013","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2004.052381","article-title":"Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002","volume":"96","author":"Declercq","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38279.705336.0B","article-title":"Rise in \u201cno indicated risk\u201d primary cesareans in the United States, 1991-2001: cross-sectional analysis","volume":"330","author":"Declercq","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.111.S1.1181","article-title":"Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the cesarean delivery rate, 1990-2000","volume":"111","author":"Rhodes","year":"2003","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib17","first-page":"842","article-title":"An objective approach to the diagnosis and management of abnormal labor","volume":"48","author":"Friedman","year":"1972","journal-title":"Bull N Y Acad Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib18","first-page":"755","article-title":"Amniotomy and the course of labor","volume":"22","author":"Friedman","year":"1963","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1568","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(54)90311-7","article-title":"The graphic analysis of labor","volume":"68","author":"Friedman","year":"1954","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes: consortium on\u00a0safe labor","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01014.x","article-title":"Augmentation of labor\u2013mode of delivery related to cervimetric progress","volume":"27","author":"Arulkumaran","year":"1987","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib22","first-page":"323","article-title":"Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours","volume":"93","author":"Rouse","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib23","first-page":"550","article-title":"Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum","volume":"98","author":"Rouse","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b46a2","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in the setting of active phase arrest of labor","volume":"112","author":"Henry","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.003","article-title":"The maternal-fetal medicine units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes; National Institute of Child Health And Human Development, maternal-fetal medicine units network","volume":"191","author":"Rouse","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90452-W","article-title":"The second stage of labor: factors influencing duration","volume":"165","author":"Piper","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.003","article-title":"Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development maternal-fetal medicine units network","volume":"201","author":"Rouse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.002","article-title":"When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia","volume":"201","author":"Le Ray","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044","article-title":"How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?","volume":"191","author":"Cheng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.021","article-title":"Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"196","author":"Cheng","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"113","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.521872","article-title":"Timing of operative vaginal delivery and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women","volume":"24","author":"Cheng","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182704880","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists workshop","volume":"120","author":"Spong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e3181d68840","article-title":"Improvements in US maternal obstetrical outcomes from 1992 to 2006","volume":"48","author":"Srinivas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1239","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823835d3","article-title":"Mode of delivery in nulliparous women and neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"118","author":"Werner","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib37","first-page":"CD005455","article-title":"Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery","volume":"11","author":"O'Mahony","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib38","series-title":"Operative vaginal delivery: ACOG practice bulletin 17","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211734","article-title":"Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency","volume":"27","author":"Powell","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211735","article-title":"Forceps delivery: potential benefits and a call for continued training","volume":"27","author":"Shaffer","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwp437","article-title":"The association between persistent fetal occiput posterior position and perinatal outcomes: an example of propensity score and covariate distance matching","volume":"171","author":"Cheng","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000158861.43593.49","article-title":"Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia","volume":"105","author":"Lieberman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003710276","article-title":"Manual rotation to reduce cesarean delivery in persistent occiput posterior or transverse position","volume":"24","author":"Shaffer","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000281666.04924.be","article-title":"Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate","volume":"110","author":"Le Ray","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30647-8","article-title":"Guidelines for operative vaginal birth: clinical practice obstetrics committee","volume":"26","author":"Cargill","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.12.025","article-title":"Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section","volume":"136","author":"Reichman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.029","article-title":"Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor","volume":"191","author":"Chou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182004fa9","article-title":"Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings: practice bulletin no. 116","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181aef106","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles; ACOG practice bulletin no. 106","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.053","article-title":"Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy","volume":"197","author":"Larma","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-837272","article-title":"Predictive value of late decelerations for fetal acidemia in unselective low-risk pregnancies","volume":"22","author":"Sameshima","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.07.014","article-title":"Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy","volume":"190","author":"Sameshima","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90441-0","article-title":"Fetal heart rate response to scalp blood sampling","volume":"144","author":"Clark","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am\u00a0J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(84)80067-8","article-title":"The scalp stimulation test: a clinical alternative to fetal scalp\u00a0blood sampling","volume":"148","author":"Clark","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.046","article-title":"Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia","volume":"207","author":"Cahill","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00525-X","article-title":"Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: a comparison of scalp stimulation with scalp blood pH sampling","volume":"89","author":"Elimian","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(85)80116-2","article-title":"Saline amnioinfusion for relief of repetitive variable decelerations: a prospective randomized study","volume":"153","author":"Miyazaki","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib58","first-page":"69","article-title":"A prospective, randomized evaluation of intrapartum amnioinfusion: fetal acid-base status and cesarean delivery","volume":"36","author":"MacGregor","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1370","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90894-D","article-title":"Prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"162","author":"Strong","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1146","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90003-P","article-title":"A prospective randomized study of saline solution amnioinfusion","volume":"162","author":"Owen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)91641-X","article-title":"Prophylactic amnioinfusion improves outcome of pregnancy complicated by thick meconium and oligohydramnios","volume":"167","author":"Macri","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib62","first-page":"10","article-title":"Late abruptio placenta in trauma patients: implications for monitoring","volume":"63","author":"Higgins","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(86)90083-4","article-title":"Fetal heart monitoring and ultrasound in the management of placental abruption","volume":"24","author":"Ito","year":"1986","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106850","article-title":"A comprehensive program to improve safety for pregnant women and fetuses in motor vehicle crashes: a preliminary report","volume":"182","author":"Pearlman","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.07.032","article-title":"Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much?","volume":"207","author":"Stewart","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182733b6e","article-title":"Association of atypical decelerations with acidemia","volume":"120","author":"Cahill","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib67","first-page":"CD000116","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labor","volume":"5","author":"Neilson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2195","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa061170","article-title":"Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development maternal-fetal medicine units network","volume":"355","author":"Bloom","year":"2006","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib69","first-page":"CD001233","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labor","volume":"3","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib70","first-page":"129","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis","volume":"99","author":"Skupski","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199603073341001","article-title":"Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy","volume":"334","author":"Nelson","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib72","first-page":"CD000136","article-title":"Maternal oxygen administration for fetal distress","volume":"12","author":"Fawole","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1362","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000164474.03350.7c","article-title":"Efficacy of intrauterine resuscitation techniques in improving fetal oxygen status during labor","volume":"105","author":"Simpson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib74","first-page":"CD000035","article-title":"Tocolytics for suspected intrapartum fetal distress","author":"Kulier","year":"1998","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31820a062b","article-title":"Intrauterine resuscitation during labor","volume":"54","author":"Garite","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib76","first-page":"164","article-title":"Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies","volume":"100","author":"Rayburn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib77","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2011","volume":"62","author":"Martin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.003","article-title":"Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age","volume":"195","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labor compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.09.019","article-title":"Induction of labor\u00a0compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes","volume":"207","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am\u00a0J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eb6e9b","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix","volume":"116","author":"Osmundson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820caf12","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"117","author":"Osmundson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib85","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labor for improving birth\u00a0outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"G\u00fclmezoglu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.015","article-title":"Increased neonatal mortality among normal-weight births beyond 41 weeks of gestation in California","volume":"199","author":"Bruckner","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31825bd286","article-title":"Risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age","volume":"120","author":"Rosenstein","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib88","first-page":"CD000941","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"10","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1239","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0","article-title":"Labor induction with a Foley balloon inflated to 30 mL compared with 60 mL: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"115","author":"Delaney","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827e5dca","article-title":"Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Carbone","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318253d7aa","article-title":"Normal progress of induced labor","volume":"119","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib92","first-page":"671","article-title":"Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol","volume":"96","author":"Rouse","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157437.10998.e7","article-title":"When has an induction failed?","volume":"105","author":"Simon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318207887a","article-title":"Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child\u00a0Health and Human Development (NICHD) maternal-fetal medicine units network (MFMU)","volume":"117","author":"Rouse","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.11.059","article-title":"Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003","volume":"199","author":"Lee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2008.227","article-title":"Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis","volume":"29","author":"Clock","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200607000-00058","article-title":"Mode of term singleton breech delivery: ACOG committee opinion no. 340","volume":"108","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2010.61","article-title":"Effectiveness of epidural anesthesia for external cephalic version (ECV)","volume":"30","author":"Yoshida","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib99","series-title":"Fetal macrosomia: ACOG practice bulletin no. 22","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1480","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1996.03540180036030","article-title":"The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound","volume":"276","author":"Rouse","year":"1996","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.065","article-title":"Estimated fetal weight by ultrasound: a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery?","volume":"207","author":"Little","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139515.97799.f6","article-title":"Gestational weight gain, macrosomia, and risk of cesarean birth in nondiabetic nulliparas","volume":"104","author":"Stotland","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182289f42","article-title":"Effect of second-trimester and third-trimester rate of\u00a0gestational weight gain on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"118","author":"Durie","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000425668.87506.4c","article-title":"Weight gain during pregnancy: committee opinion no. 548","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182318651","article-title":"Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008","volume":"118","author":"Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1214939","article-title":"A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy: twin birth study collaborative group","volume":"369","author":"Barrett","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219749.96274.15","article-title":"Valacyclovir prophylaxis to prevent recurrent herpes at delivery: a randomized clinical trial [published erratum appears in Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:695]","volume":"108","author":"Sheffield","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.185","article-title":"A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of acyclovir in late pregnancy for the reduction of herpes simplex virus shedding and cesarean delivery","volume":"188","author":"Watts","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.042","article-title":"Acyclovir prophylaxis for pregnant women with a known history of\u00a0herpes simplex virus: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"193","author":"Little","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1489","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000263902.31953.3e","article-title":"Management of herpes in pregnancy: ACOG practice bulletin no. 82","volume":"109","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib111","first-page":"CD003766","article-title":"Continuous support for women during childbirth","volume":"7","author":"Hodnett","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00146.x","article-title":"Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"Chaillet","year":"2007","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31818b080d","article-title":"Obstetricians' rising liability insurance premiums and inductions at late preterm gestations","volume":"47","author":"Murthy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31818475de","article-title":"Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"47","author":"Yang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24","article-title":"Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.11.061","article-title":"Incidence and risk factors of amniotic fluid embolisms: a population-based\u00a0study on 3 million births in the United States","volume":"199","author":"Abenhaim","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib117","first-page":"CD006553","article-title":"Planned cesarean section for women with a twin\u00a0pregnancy","volume":"12","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations; GRADE working group","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026_bib119","unstructured":"Basow DS, ed. UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2013. Available at: http:\/\/www.uptodate.com\/home\/grading-guide. Accessed Oct. 9, 2013."}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814000556?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814000556?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:55:29Z","timestamp":1757588129000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937814000556"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]},"references-count":119,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937814000556"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Published by Mosby, Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}