{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T16:20:35Z","timestamp":1790439635388,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,1]],"date-time":"2014-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1409529600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,1]],"date-time":"2014-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1409529600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,14]],"date-time":"2014-03-14T13:46:57Z","timestamp":1394804817000},"page":"249.e1-249.e16","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":78,"title":["Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"211","author":[{"given":"Kelly S.","family":"Gibson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thaddeus P.","family":"Waters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer L.","family":"Bailit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib2","first-page":"45S","article-title":"Elective induction of labor in nulliparous women increases the risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"101","author":"Smith","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000210528.32940.c6","article-title":"Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women","volume":"107","author":"Hoffman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib4","first-page":"235","article-title":"Elective induction vs spontaneous labor: associations and outcomes","volume":"50","author":"Glantz","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.003","article-title":"Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age","volume":"195","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:716-23.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70269-1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(75)92435-6","article-title":"Elective induction of labor: randomized prospective trial","volume":"1","author":"Cole","year":"1975","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial; the Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of\u00a0labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomized equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90631-R","article-title":"Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management","volume":"169","author":"Kjos","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500274187","article-title":"Consequences of routine delivery at 38 weeks for A-2 gestational diabetes","volume":"18","author":"Rayburn","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labor compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.09.019","article-title":"Induction of labor\u00a0compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes","volume":"207","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820caf12","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"117","author":"Osmundson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eb6e9b","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix","volume":"116","author":"Osmundson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2010.1015","article-title":"Respiratory morbidity in late preterm births","volume":"304","author":"Consortium on Safe Labor","year":"2010","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0803267","article-title":"Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes; Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network","volume":"360","author":"Tita","year":"2009","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2008-3232","article-title":"Delivery indications at late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States","volume":"124","author":"Reddy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.058","article-title":"Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States","volume":"203","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib23","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2004","volume":"55","author":"Martin","year":"2006","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014","article-title":"Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"206","author":"Laughon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781400221X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781400221X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:57:00Z","timestamp":1757588220000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293781400221X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293781400221X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}