{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T14:47:28Z","timestamp":1790174848764,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,1]],"date-time":"2014-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1417392000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,1]],"date-time":"2014-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1417392000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,12]],"date-time":"2014-06-12T10:16:42Z","timestamp":1402568202000},"page":"669.e1-669.e10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"211","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5245-5934","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah","family":"Crimmins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Desai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9632-512X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dana","family":"Block-Abraham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christoph","family":"Berg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ulrich","family":"Gembruch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmet Alexander","family":"Baschat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2002.00653.x","article-title":"Timing the delivery of the preterm severely growth-restricted fetus: venous Doppler, cardiotocography or the biophysical profile?","volume":"19","author":"Romero","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00079.x","article-title":"Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"15","author":"Hershkovitz","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x","article-title":"Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study","volume":"18","author":"Hecher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5386","article-title":"Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"32","author":"Turan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(80)90457-3","article-title":"Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile","volume":"136","author":"Manning","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90002-Z","article-title":"Fetal biophysical profile score: VI, correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH","volume":"169","author":"Manning","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2657","article-title":"Doppler and biophysical assessment in the growth restricted fetus: distribution of test results","volume":"27","author":"Baschat","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-200104000-00011","article-title":"Antenatal assessment of the growth restricted fetus","volume":"13","author":"Baschat","year":"2001","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic\u00a0weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00671101","article-title":"Ultrasonic measuring data as parameters for diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"214","author":"Hansmann","year":"1973","journal-title":"Arch Gynakol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(86)90144-4","article-title":"Identification of the small for gestational age fetus with the use of gestational age-independent indices of fetal growth","volume":"155","author":"Divon","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75","article-title":"Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction","volume":"109","author":"Baschat","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb08656.x","article-title":"Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus","volume":"93","author":"Wladimiroff","year":"1986","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(21)00470-8","article-title":"The fetal biophysical profile score: current status","volume":"17","author":"Manning","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90917-4","article-title":"Clinical management of the fetus with markedly diminished umbilical artery end-diastolic flow","volume":"161","author":"Divon","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2002.00627.x","article-title":"Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus","volume":"19","author":"Ferrazzi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.965","article-title":"Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"23","author":"Bilardo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9011","article-title":"Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction","volume":"38","author":"Turan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.039","article-title":"Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist?","volume":"209","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00591.x","article-title":"The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens","volume":"18","author":"Baschat","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000187540.37795.3a","article-title":"Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"106","author":"Cosmi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02040266.x","article-title":"Potential for diagnosing imminent risk to appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses by Doppler sonographic examination of umbilical and cerebral arterial blood flow","volume":"2","author":"Hecher","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib24","article-title":"Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction","author":"Savchev","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.007","article-title":"Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study","volume":"208","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib27","first-page":"1183","article-title":"Fetal deaths in the United States: influence of high-risk conditions and implications for management","volume":"100","author":"Smulian","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70114-6","article-title":"Fetal death after normal biophysical profile score: an eighteen-year experience","volume":"181","author":"Dayal","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1546","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.012","article-title":"Condition-specific antepartum fetal testing","volume":"191","author":"Kontopoulos","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.030","article-title":"Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"208","author":"Trudell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814005912?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814005912?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:00:21Z","timestamp":1757588421000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937814005912"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,12]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937814005912"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}