{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T12:08:30Z","timestamp":1785499710757,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,1]],"date-time":"2015-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1425168000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,1]],"date-time":"2015-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1425168000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,18]],"date-time":"2014-10-18T05:48:18Z","timestamp":1413611298000},"page":"355.e1-355.e7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"212","author":[{"given":"Abigail R.","family":"Aiken","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine E.","family":"Aiken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Medhat S.","family":"Alberry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeremy C.","family":"Brockelsby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James G.","family":"Scott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154889.47063.84","article-title":"Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome","volume":"105","author":"Senecal","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01105.x","article-title":"Malpresentations\u2013impact on mode of delivery","volume":"90","author":"Gardberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01060.x","article-title":"Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium: maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery","volume":"49","author":"Al-Suhel","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03648.x","article-title":"Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared","volume":"89","author":"Healy","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2012.01458.x","article-title":"Management of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor: a survey of obstetric practice in Australia and New Zealand","volume":"52","author":"Phipps","year":"2012","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008","article-title":"Rising rates of cesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend","volume":"157","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.3109\/01443610903572109","article-title":"Caesarean section in the second stage of labor: a retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidity","volume":"30","author":"McKelvey","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.12.033","article-title":"First versus second stage C\/S maternal and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"175","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12199","article-title":"A\u00a0re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labor","volume":"120","author":"Tempest","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828b72cb","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery","volume":"121","author":"Stock","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1526","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12398","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study","volume":"120","author":"Bahl","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib12","series-title":"Greentop guideline 62; operative vaginal delivery","author":"Bahl","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib13","first-page":"69","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists","volume":"74","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03335.x","article-title":"The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples","volume":"119","author":"Yeh","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/70.1.41","article-title":"The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects","volume":"70","author":"Rosenbaum","year":"1983","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2265","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B","article-title":"Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group","volume":"17","author":"D'Agostino","year":"1998","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120085500","article-title":"A\u00a0matched controlled study of Kielland's forceps for transverse arrest of the fetal vertex","volume":"21","author":"Schiff","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.287.6388.315","article-title":"Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?","volume":"287","author":"Cardozo","year":"1983","journal-title":"Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)80036-1","article-title":"Failed trial of vacuum or forceps\u2013maternal and fetal outcome","volume":"176","author":"Revah","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.02.002","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis","volume":"206","author":"Gilbert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2013.4347","article-title":"A\u00a0statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care program: impact on birth outcomes","volume":"168","author":"Roman","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib22","series-title":"Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from an incomplete-data perspective","first-page":"44","article-title":"A\u00a0comparisons of experimental and observational data analyses","author":"Hill","year":"2004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-127-8_Part_2-199710151-00064","article-title":"Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores","volume":"127","author":"Rubin","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.034","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years after operative delivery in the second stage of labor: a cohort study","volume":"197","author":"Bahl","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(93)90319-R","article-title":"Mode of delivery in deep transverse arrest","volume":"43","author":"Jain","year":"1993","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib26","first-page":"380","article-title":"Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?","volume":"33","author":"Tan","year":"1992","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000188","article-title":"Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success","volume":"123","author":"Aiken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.0399.x","article-title":"Vacuum extraction: is there any need to improve the current training in the UK?","volume":"83","author":"Sau","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1109\/TITB.2011.2107746","article-title":"Simulation of an instrumental childbirth for the training of the forceps extraction: control algorithm and evaluation","volume":"15","author":"Moreau","year":"2011","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814010783?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814010783?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:04:17Z","timestamp":1757588657000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937814010783"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937814010783"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}