{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,27]],"date-time":"2026-06-27T13:32:01Z","timestamp":1782567121782,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,1]],"date-time":"2015-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1430438400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,1]],"date-time":"2015-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1430438400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,19]],"date-time":"2014-12-19T23:25:19Z","timestamp":1419031519000},"page":"621.e1-621.e10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":89,"title":["Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"212","author":[{"given":"Awathif Dhanya","family":"Mackeen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4814-8480","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Meike","family":"Schuster","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincenzo","family":"Berghella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.043","article-title":"Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review","volume":"209","author":"Dahlke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1607","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.063","article-title":"Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Berghella","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib3","first-page":"CD003577","article-title":"Techniques and materials for skin closure in cesarean section","volume":"11","author":"Mackeen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.755509","article-title":"Cesarean skin closure preferences: a survey of obstetricians","volume":"26","author":"Mackeen","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000227","article-title":"Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Mackeen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1016\/0735-6757(95)90100-0","article-title":"Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations","volume":"13","author":"Quinn","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1960","DOI":"10.1097\/01.PRS.0000122207.28773.56","article-title":"The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation","volume":"113","author":"Draaijers","year":"2004","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib8","first-page":"627","article-title":"Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions: staples vs subcuticular suture","volume":"42","author":"Frishman","year":"1997","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.07.003","article-title":"Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in cesarean section: a randomized study","volume":"138","author":"Gaertner","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.01.019","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures","volume":"200","author":"Rousseau","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.07.011","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates\u00a0of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"203","author":"Basha","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.02.001","article-title":"Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial","volume":"203","author":"Cromi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib13","first-page":"S267","article-title":"Techniques for wound closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"204","author":"de Graaf","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a5f0c3","article-title":"Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"122","author":"Aabakke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12142","article-title":"Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome","volume":"92","author":"Huppelschoten","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827a072c","article-title":"Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Figueroa","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3274-9","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section","volume":"290","author":"Sharma","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib18","first-page":"374","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial on suture materials for skin closure at cesarean section: do wound infection rates differ?","volume":"102","author":"Chunder","year":"2012","journal-title":"S\u00a0Afr Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.018","article-title":"Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"204","author":"Clay","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c403","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c403","article-title":"Staples for skin closure in surgery","volume":"340","author":"Singh","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ad61e","article-title":"Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"117","author":"Tuuli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib22","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: preliminary data for 2009","volume":"59","author":"Hamilton","year":"2010","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1053\/jhin.2001.1086","article-title":"An economic analysis of surgical wound infection","volume":"49","author":"Reilly","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Hosp Infect"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814024454?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937814024454?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:03:22Z","timestamp":1757588602000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937814024454"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937814024454"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}