{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T04:13:33Z","timestamp":1778732013542,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,1]],"date-time":"2015-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1438387200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,28]],"date-time":"2015-02-28T02:06:48Z","timestamp":1425089208000},"page":"222.e1-222.e10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":44,"title":["Discordance in fetal biometry and Doppler are independent predictors of the risk of perinatal loss in twin pregnancies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"213","author":[{"given":"Asma A.","family":"Khalil","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naila","family":"Khan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sophie","family":"Bowe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alessandra","family":"Familiari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aris","family":"Papageorghiou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amar","family":"Bhide","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Basky","family":"Thilaganathan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x","article-title":"Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study","volume":"115","author":"Hack","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11110","article-title":"Prospective risk of late stillbirth in monochorionic twins: a regional cohort study","volume":"39","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12412","article-title":"Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort","volume":"41","author":"D\u2019Antonio","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13253","article-title":"Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort","volume":"44","author":"Khalil","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib5","unstructured":"National Collaborating Centre for Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Health. Multiple pregnancy. The management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period. London, UK: Commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence;\u00a02011."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d5714","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5714","article-title":"Guideline Development Group. Antenatal care for twin and triplet pregnancies: summary of NICE guidance","volume":"343","author":"Visintin","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34916-7","article-title":"Ultrasound in twin pregnancies","volume":"33","author":"Morin","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821fd208","article-title":"Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance","volume":"118","author":"Breathnach","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200410000-00046","article-title":"Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. Joint editorial. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 56","volume":"104","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13190","article-title":"Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE)","volume":"42","author":"Lees","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, et\u00a0al. Two year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015 [Epub ahead of print].","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib12","unstructured":"Khalil A, Morales-Rosell\u00f3 J, Elsarag M, et\u00a0al. The association between fetal Doppler and admission to neonatal unit at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 [Epub ahead of print]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khalil A, Morales-Rosell\u00f3 J, Morlando M, et\u00a0al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 [Epub ahead of print].","DOI":"10.1097\/01.aoa.0000482630.80689.e9"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14647","article-title":"Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratios","volume":"45","author":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1159\/000357592","article-title":"Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol","volume":"36","author":"Figueras","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3941","article-title":"Doppler changes in the vertebral, middle cerebral, and umbilical arteries in fetuses delivered after 34 weeks: relationship to severity of growth restriction","volume":"32","author":"Morales Rosell\u00f3","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.6.371.375","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and neonatal outcome in diamnionic monochorionic and dichorionic twins","volume":"10","author":"Gaziano","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02592.x","article-title":"First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable?","volume":"117","author":"Dias","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7740","article-title":"Second-trimester assessment of gestational age in twins: validation of singleton biometry charts","volume":"37","author":"Dias","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8956","article-title":"First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy","volume":"38","author":"Dias","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements, a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8831","article-title":"ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan","volume":"37","author":"Salomon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.019","article-title":"Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy","volume":"192","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2002.077","article-title":"Blood flow velocity waveforms of the fetal middle cerebral artery in a normal population: reference values from 18 weeks to 42 weeks of gestation","volume":"30","author":"Bahlmann","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited","volume":"21","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-3782(87)90099-5","article-title":"New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks","volume":"15","author":"Yudkin","year":"1987","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1159\/000323586","article-title":"Prediction of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies by second- and third- trimester ultrasound","volume":"30","author":"Hoopmann","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2469","article-title":"Validity of sonographic prediction of fetal weight and weight discordance in twin pregnancies","volume":"30","author":"Diaz-Garcia","year":"2010","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822f129d","article-title":"Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Hillman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib30","series-title":"The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Green-top guideline number 31","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib31","first-page":"85","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction. ACOG practice bulletin no. 12, January 2000","volume":"72","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14640","article-title":"Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort","volume":"45","author":"Stirrup","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1375\/twin.14.5.457","article-title":"Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective IUGR compared with uncomplicated monochorionic twins","volume":"14","author":"Weisz","year":"2011","journal-title":"Twin Res Hum Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.11.002","article-title":"Catalunya and Balears Monochorionic Network. Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"96","author":"Acosta-Rojas","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2119-z","article-title":"Selective and non-selective intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies: high-risk factors and perinatal outcome","volume":"285","author":"Gao","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022","volume":"206","author":"Berkley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-3552(98)80041-2","article-title":"Doppler ultrasound in multiple pregnancies","volume":"12","author":"Giles","year":"1998","journal-title":"Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02066.x","article-title":"The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy","volume":"110","author":"Giles","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14264.x","article-title":"The effect of introduction of umbilical Doppler recordings to obstetric practice","volume":"100","author":"Johnstone","year":"1993","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"956","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15332.x","article-title":"Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis in high risk pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"98","author":"Newnham","year":"1991","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781500160X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781500160X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,11]],"date-time":"2024-05-11T21:10:01Z","timestamp":1715461801000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293781500160X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293781500160X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Discordance in fetal biometry and Doppler are independent predictors of the risk of perinatal loss in twin pregnancies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}