{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,20]],"date-time":"2026-09-20T21:44:56Z","timestamp":1789940696163,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,1]],"date-time":"2015-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1446336000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,1]],"date-time":"2015-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1446336000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,13]],"date-time":"2015-04-13T12:45:30Z","timestamp":1428929130000},"page":"629-636","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":76,"title":["Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"213","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0078-2113","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriele","family":"Saccone","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincenzo","family":"Berghella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2008-3232","article-title":"Delivery indications at late preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States","volume":"124","author":"Reddy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000428649.57622.a7","article-title":"Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Committee opinion no. 561","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib3","first-page":"547","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth","volume":"79","author":"Fedelman","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(75)92435-6","article-title":"Elective induction of labor: a randomized prospective trial","volume":"1","author":"Cole","year":"1975","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1978.tb10462.x","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial of selective planned delivery","volume":"85","author":"Martin","year":"1978","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347909154610","article-title":"Spontaneous labor and elective induction\u2013a prospective randomized study, effects on mother and fetus","volume":"58","author":"Tylleskar","year":"1979","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500139604","article-title":"Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"18","author":"Nielsen","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neontal Med"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72S","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000447386.34821.50","article-title":"Elective induction of nulliparous labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"132","author":"Miller","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib9","first-page":"185","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term: doing a lot to gain a little?","volume":"20","author":"Abotalib","year":"1999","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.119643","article-title":"Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study","volume":"186","author":"Cammu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1690","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91558-R","article-title":"Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome","volume":"166","author":"Macer","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib12","first-page":"917","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.06.018","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction at term: induction or spontaneous labor? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): a pilot study","volume":"125","author":"Van de Hove","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1159\/000010207","article-title":"Induction versus expectant management in twin pregnancy","volume":"49","author":"Boers","year":"2000","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks\u2019 gestation (HYPITAT): a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"62","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib17","series-title":"Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 (update March 2011)","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00149-X","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study","volume":"89","author":"Gonen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.10.028","article-title":"Induction of labor or expectant management for large-for-dates fetuses: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"206","author":"Boulvain","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1159\/000010207","article-title":"Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy","volume":"49","author":"Suzuki","year":"2000","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03356.x","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the twins timing of birth randomized trial","volume":"119","author":"Dodd","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1999.tb01119.x","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"25","author":"Amano","year":"1999","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348009154623","article-title":"Spontaneous labor and elective induction\u2013a prospective randomized study: bilirubin levels in\u00a0the neonatal period","volume":"59","author":"Leijnon","year":"1980","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.1979.tb05054.x","article-title":"Spontaneous labor and elective induction\u2013a prospective randomized study: behavioral assessment and neurological examination in the\u00a0newborn period","volume":"68","author":"Leijnon","year":"1979","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-12-145","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multicenter prospective, randomized controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Walker","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12328","article-title":"Does induction of labor increase the risk of cesarean section? A\u00a0systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in\u00a0women with intact membranes","volume":"121","author":"Wood","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925","article-title":"Use of labor induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Mishanina","year":"2014","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820780ff","article-title":"Use and misuse of the term elective in obstetrics","volume":"117","author":"Berghella","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib30","first-page":"115","article-title":"Meconium-stained amniotic fluid: increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome","volume":"84","author":"Berkus","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91856-6","article-title":"Meconium aspiration syndrome: reflection on a murky subject","volume":"166","author":"Katz","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib32","first-page":"329","article-title":"Meconium: a 1990s perspective on an old obstetric hazard","volume":"83","author":"Nathan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1016\/S0031-3955(05)70025-0","article-title":"Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and the meconium aspiration syndrome: an update","volume":"45","author":"Cleary","year":"1998","journal-title":"Pediatric Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.85.5.715","article-title":"Meconium aspiration syndrome: have we made a difference?","volume":"85","author":"Wiswell","year":"1990","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1999.780808.x","article-title":"Women\u2019s anticipations of and experiences with induction of labor","volume":"78","author":"Nuutila","year":"1999","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004_bib36","unstructured":"Reddy U. A randomized trial of induction versus expectant management (ARRIVE). Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01990612. Available at: http:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT01990612. Accessed Oct. 15, 2014."}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815003567?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815003567?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:05:26Z","timestamp":1757588726000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937815003567"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937815003567"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}