{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T21:50:42Z","timestamp":1790286642512,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]],"date-time":"2015-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1448928000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]],"date-time":"2015-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1448928000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,13]],"date-time":"2015-06-13T04:25:24Z","timestamp":1434169524000},"page":"789-801","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":101,"title":["Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"213","author":[{"given":"Agustin","family":"Conde-Agudelo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roberto","family":"Romero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x","article-title":"The preterm parturition syndrome","volume":"113","author":"Romero","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1251816","article-title":"Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes","volume":"345","author":"Romero","year":"2014","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91084-P","article-title":"Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length","volume":"163","author":"Andersen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","article-title":"The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery","volume":"334","author":"Iams","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70259-X","article-title":"Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery","volume":"177","author":"Berghella","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.x","article-title":"Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"12","author":"Heath","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib7","first-page":"902","article-title":"Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18-22 weeks\u2019 gestation and the risk of preterm delivery","volume":"92","author":"Taipale","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1458","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106851","article-title":"Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length <\u00a0or\u00a0=15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"182","author":"Hassan","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1340","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.286.11.1340","article-title":"Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"286","author":"Owen","year":"2001","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154157.22500.1d","article-title":"Prediction of preterm delivery in the second trimester","volume":"105","author":"de Carvalho","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2773","article-title":"Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study","volume":"27","author":"To","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.202","article-title":"Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review","volume":"22","author":"Honest","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5323","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review","volume":"31","author":"Crane","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta13430","article-title":"Screening to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling","volume":"13","author":"Honest","year":"2009","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1097\/RUQ.0b013e3181fe0e05","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length as a predictor of preterm birth: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Domin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Q"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.02.064","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9013","article-title":"Cervical length measurement for the prediction of preterm birth in multiple pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis","volume":"38","author":"Lim","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib18","first-page":"256A","article-title":"Prediction of preterm delivery with cervical length in twin pregnancy: a meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"21","author":"Kindinger","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00120-3","article-title":"Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks\u2019 gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth","volume":"92","author":"Guzman","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123058","article-title":"Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labor","volume":"186","author":"Naim","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.32","article-title":"Cervical length at 11-14 weeks\u2019 and 22-24 weeks\u2019 gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery","volume":"21","author":"Carvalho","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.03.021","article-title":"Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10-14 and 20-24 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery","volume":"130","author":"Ozdemir","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.11.017","article-title":"Rate of sonographic cervical shortening and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"206","author":"Moroz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2000.079010851.x","article-title":"Cervical length assessment in twin pregnancies using transvaginal ultrasound","volume":"79","author":"Ong","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib25","first-page":"55","article-title":"The role of cervical length change from first to second trimester of pregnancy for the prediction of preterm delivery","volume":"25","author":"Antsaklis","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829ab714","article-title":"Biomarkers and cervical length to predict spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women","volume":"122","author":"Bastek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.030","article-title":"Cervical length\u2014time to report the rate of change?","volume":"211","author":"Iams","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.326.7379.41","article-title":"Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative","volume":"326","author":"Bossuyt","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008","article-title":"Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy","volume":"149","author":"Leeflang","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00265-8","article-title":"Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth","volume":"107","author":"Honest","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.05.014","article-title":"A\u00a0systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies","volume":"66","author":"Whiting","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-19","article-title":"No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"5","author":"Whiting","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(91)90128-V","article-title":"Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies","volume":"44","author":"Simel","year":"1991","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022","article-title":"Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews","volume":"58","author":"Reitsma","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1099","article-title":"Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data","volume":"21","author":"Walter","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X13475719","article-title":"Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with the Bayesian SAS PROC MCMC: methodology and empirical evaluation in 50 meta-analyses","volume":"33","author":"Menke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.2992","article-title":"We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews","volume":"27","author":"Zwinderman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03510330081039","article-title":"Users\u2019 guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group","volume":"271","author":"Jaeschke","year":"1994","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1185","article-title":"Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests","volume":"21","author":"Lijmer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016","article-title":"The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed","volume":"58","author":"Deeks","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3","article-title":"Index for rating diagnostic tests","volume":"3","author":"Youden","year":"1950","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.28","article-title":"Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies?","volume":"21","author":"Berghella","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.150","article-title":"Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study","volume":"21","author":"Bergelin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1048","article-title":"Prediction of preterm\u00a0delivery in twin pregnancy: a prospective, observational study of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing","volume":"23","author":"Gibson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.11.025","article-title":"Can shortened midtrimester cervical length predict very early spontaneous preterm birth?","volume":"191","author":"Owen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2694","article-title":"Comparison of transvaginal sonography in recumbent and standing maternal positions to predict spontaneous preterm birth in singleton and twin pregnancies","volume":"27","author":"Arabin","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3902","article-title":"Short cervix: is a follow-up measurement useful?","volume":"29","author":"Fox","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1159\/000106486","article-title":"Progressive cervical length changes versus single cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasound for prediction of preterm delivery","volume":"64","author":"Dilek","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.09.004","article-title":"Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies using the change in cervical length over time","volume":"202","author":"Fox","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2010.088","article-title":"Two-stage transvaginal cervical length screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancies","volume":"38","author":"Hofmeister","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2010.149","article-title":"Follow-up cervical length in asymptomatic high-risk women and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"31","author":"Crane","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1017\/thg.2012.27","article-title":"The change in cervical length over time as a predictor of preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies who have a normal mid-trimester cervical length","volume":"15","author":"Oh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Twin Res Hum Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.02.019","article-title":"The use of cervical length and change in cervical length for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies","volume":"169","author":"Khalil","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.900038","article-title":"Cervical length in asymptomatic twin pregnancies: prospective multicenter comparison of predictive indicators","volume":"28","author":"Lev\u00eaque","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.12.003","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data","volume":"206","author":"Romero","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.10.877","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis","volume":"208","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13032","article-title":"Effectiveness of progestogens to improve perinatal outcome in\u00a0twin pregnancies: an individual participant data\u00a0meta-analysis","volume":"122","author":"Schuit","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1800","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60030-0","article-title":"Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"379","author":"Goya","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7338","article-title":"Effect of progesterone on cervical shortening in women at risk for preterm birth: secondary analysis from a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"34","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815005980?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815005980?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:05:29Z","timestamp":1757588729000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937815005980"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937815005980"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Published by Mosby, Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}