{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T07:06:19Z","timestamp":1761807979335,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,1]],"date-time":"2016-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1454284800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,1]],"date-time":"2016-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1454284800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,14]],"date-time":"2015-10-14T13:40:53Z","timestamp":1444830053000},"page":"285.e1-285.e10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["A barrier retractor to reduce surgical site infections and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"214","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5302-5621","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katherine M.","family":"Scolari Childress","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey A.","family":"Gavard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Donald G.","family":"Ward","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kinley","family":"Berger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gilad A.","family":"Gross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.049","article-title":"Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient","volume":"203","author":"Alanis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J\u00a0Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03452.x","article-title":"Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study","volume":"119","author":"Wloch","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br\u00a0J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701515225","article-title":"Post-cesarean surgical site infections according to CDC standards: rates and risk factors. A prospective cohort study","volume":"86","author":"Opoien","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2004.10.001","article-title":"National nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004","volume":"32","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Infection Control"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1086\/587810","article-title":"Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section","volume":"29","author":"Olsen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01090.x","article-title":"Obesity, diabetes, and the risk of infections diagnosed in hospital and post-discharge infections after cesarean section: a prospective cohort study","volume":"90","author":"Leth","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2011.05.020","article-title":"Wound infection in the obese pregnant woman","volume":"35","author":"Tipton","year":"2011","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182570372","article-title":"Wound protectors reduces surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"256","author":"Edwards","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib9","first-page":"212","article-title":"Randomized, controlled investigation of the anti-infective properties of the Alexis retractor\/protector of incision sites","volume":"62","author":"Horiuchi","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Trauma"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib10","first-page":"14.e346","article-title":"Alexis O-ring wound retractor vs conventional wound protection for the prevention of surgical site infections in colorectal resections","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1007\/DCR.0b013e3181ed3f7e","article-title":"Barrier wound protection decreases surgical site infection in open elective colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"53","author":"Reid","year":"2010","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhin.2012.03.005","article-title":"Plastic wound retractors as bacteriological barriers in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective multi-institutional trial","volume":"81","author":"Mohan","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Hospital Infect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1089\/sur.2009.072","article-title":"A\u00a0wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion","volume":"11","author":"Horiuchi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Infect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/0196-6553(88)90053-3","article-title":"CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988","volume":"16","author":"Garner","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Infection Control"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib15","first-page":"57","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective randomized study for evaluation of wound retractors in the prevention of incision site infections after cesarean section","volume":"38","author":"Theodoridis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1086\/501831","article-title":"Risk factors for surgical-site infections following cesarean section","volume":"22","author":"Killian","year":"2001","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidem"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816521e2","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"111","author":"Coutinho","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000277712.67230.22","article-title":"Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"110","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2186-1","article-title":"Comparison of uterine exteriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections","volume":"285","author":"Gode","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2006.10.009","article-title":"Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial","volume":"16","author":"Nafisi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.01.009","article-title":"Extraabdominal vs intrabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis","volume":"200","author":"Walsh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1053\/jhin.2002.1275","article-title":"Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections?","volume":"52","author":"Whitby","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Hospital Infect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.043","article-title":"Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review","volume":"209","author":"Dahlke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib24","article-title":"Antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: timing of administration. ACOG Committee opinion no. 465","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1472","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182238c31","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin no. 120. Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery","volume":"117","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000124807.76451.47","article-title":"Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Chelmow","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827a072c","article-title":"Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Figueroa","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ad61e","article-title":"Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"117","author":"Tuuli","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815012107?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815012107?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:06:46Z","timestamp":1757588806000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937815012107"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937815012107"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0002-9378"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A barrier retractor to reduce surgical site infections and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.096","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}