{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T18:16:20Z","timestamp":1793729780380,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]],"date-time":"2016-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1459468800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]],"date-time":"2016-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1459468800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,11]],"date-time":"2015-11-11T14:02:34Z","timestamp":1447250554000},"page":"507.e1-507.e6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":91,"title":["Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"214","author":[{"given":"St\u00e9phanie","family":"Roberge","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suzanne","family":"Demers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mario","family":"Girard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Olga","family":"Vikhareva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0754-4161","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"St\u00e9phanie","family":"Markey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nils","family":"Chaillet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lynne","family":"Moore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ga\u00e9tan","family":"Paris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emmanuel","family":"Bujold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318227b8d9","article-title":"The rising cesarean delivery rate in America: what are the consequences?","volume":"118","author":"Blanchette","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-3753","article-title":"Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006","volume":"121","author":"Martin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib3","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2013","volume":"64","author":"Martin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5200","article-title":"Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors","volume":"31","author":"Ofili-Yebovi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1304829","article-title":"Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect","volume":"29","author":"Roberge","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6395","article-title":"High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination","volume":"34","author":"Vikhareva Osser","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.03.008","article-title":"Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications","volume":"20","author":"Tower","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.014","article-title":"Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"211","author":"Roberge","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.04.013","article-title":"Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture","volume":"115","author":"Roberge","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12717","article-title":"Uterine sutures at prior cesarean section and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancy: a case-control study","volume":"121","author":"Sumigama","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib11","first-page":"393","article-title":"Continuous, nonlocking, single-layer repair of the low transverse uterine incision","volume":"38","author":"Jelsema","year":"1993","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib12","first-page":"530","article-title":"Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: safety and quality","volume":"30","author":"Turan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e41be3","article-title":"The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"116","author":"Bujold","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1366","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x","article-title":"Cesarean section surgical techniques: a randomized factorial trial (CAESAR)","volume":"117","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib15","article-title":"Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement","author":"Baranov","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib16","series-title":"Williams Obstetrics","article-title":"Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy","author":"Cunningham","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s003300050103","article-title":"Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections","volume":"7","author":"Dicle","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib18","first-page":"522","article-title":"Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat cesarean section scar of lower uterine segment","volume":"21","author":"Yasmin","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c869","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c869","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials","volume":"340","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.11.013","article-title":"Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on\u00a0healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery","volume":"125","author":"Sevket","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500430436","article-title":"Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography","volume":"85","author":"Hayakawa","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.4103\/2278-960X.112591","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar thickness after single versus double layer closure of transverse lower segment cesarean section","volume":"2","author":"El-Gharib","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Basic Clin Reprod Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12376","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study","volume":"42","author":"Glavind","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib24","series-title":"Essai CHORUS: comparaison de l\u2019aspect \u00e9chographique de la cicatrice de c\u00e9sarienne selon une fermeture ut\u00e9rine en un plan ou en deux plans","author":"Guyot Cottrel","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib25","first-page":"11","article-title":"Closure of uterus and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"2015","author":"Roberge","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.006","article-title":"Single- vs double-layer and locking vs nonlocking closure of uterus: missing woods for the trees?","volume":"212","author":"Sholapurkar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.007","article-title":"Reply: To PMID 24912096","volume":"212","author":"Bujold","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12542","article-title":"Long-term complications of cesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"121","author":"van der Voet","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01237.x","article-title":"Cesarean scar pregnancy","volume":"114","author":"Ash","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.028","article-title":"Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery","volume":"205","author":"Clark","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib31","first-page":"CD004732","article-title":"Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of cesarean section","volume":"7","author":"Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)60441-9","article-title":"Cesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomized controlled trial","volume":"382","author":"Abalos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib33","first-page":"231","article-title":"Single versus double layer closure of low transverse uterine incision at\u00a0cesarean section","volume":"55","author":"Sood","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynecol India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11691.x","article-title":"Introduction of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section at an African tertiary center: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"107","author":"Bjorklund","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib35","first-page":"229","article-title":"Survey on uterine closure and other cesarean techniques among Quebec\u2019s obstetricians-gynecologists","volume":"35","author":"Demers","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-014-0573-9","article-title":"The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section","volume":"64","author":"Hegde","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol India"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815022218?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815022218?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:06:14Z","timestamp":1757588774000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937815022218"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937815022218"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}