{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T05:08:26Z","timestamp":1784005706327,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,1]],"date-time":"2016-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1462060800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,1]],"date-time":"2016-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1462060800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,18]],"date-time":"2015-12-18T23:33:17Z","timestamp":1450481597000},"page":"603.e1-603.e5","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["Universal cervical length screening in singleton gestations\u00a0without a previous preterm\u00a0birth: ten\u00a0reasons\u00a0why it should be\u00a0implemented"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"214","author":[{"given":"Adeeb","family":"Khalifeh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincenzo","family":"Berghella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib1","series-title":"Principles and practice of screening for disease","author":"Wilson","year":"1968"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","article-title":"The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network","volume":"334","author":"Iams","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin, no. 130: Prediction and prevention of preterm birth","volume":"120","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.010","article-title":"Progesterone and preterm birth prevention: translating clinical trials data into clinical practice","volume":"206","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib5","series-title":"Cervical cerclage (Green-top guideline no. 60)","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.12.008","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone for asymptomatic cervical shortening and the case for universal screening of cervical length","volume":"206","author":"Combs","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"suppl1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-4755-10-S1-S2","article-title":"Born too soon: the global\u00a0epidemiology of 15\u00a0million preterm births","volume":"10","author":"Blencowe","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2151","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60560-1","article-title":"Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000","volume":"379","author":"Liu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60820-4","article-title":"National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications","volume":"379","author":"Blencowe","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.752809","article-title":"The utility of screening for historical risk factors for preterm birth in women with known second trimester cervical length","volume":"26","author":"Mella","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa067815","article-title":"Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix","volume":"357","author":"Fonseca","year":"2007","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9017","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of pre-term birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"38","author":"Hassan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.12.003","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data","volume":"206","author":"Romero","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819930b0","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy","volume":"113","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2159","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.33.12.2159","article-title":"Cervical length screening: a randomized trial assessing the impact on visit length and patient attitudes","volume":"33","author":"Romero","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1371710","article-title":"Implementation of a universal cervical length screening program for the prevention of preterm birth","volume":"31","author":"Orzechowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70259-X","article-title":"Cervical ultrasonography compared to manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery","volume":"177","author":"Berghella","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90371-2","article-title":"Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements","volume":"173","author":"Phelps","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(86)90598-3","article-title":"Ultrasound differentiation of the competent from\u00a0the incompetent cervix: prevention of preterm delivery","volume":"154","author":"Michaels","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib20","first-page":"380","article-title":"Cervical dilatation in the mid-trimester of pregnancy","volume":"18","author":"Floyd","year":"1961","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91084-P","article-title":"Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length","volume":"163","author":"Andersen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1305","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2008.27.9.1305","article-title":"Is\u00a0transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method\u00a0of cervical length assessment?","volume":"27","author":"Saul","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x","article-title":"Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population","volume":"50","author":"Stone","year":"2010","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00094.x","article-title":"Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks\u2019 scan: problems with transabdominal sonography","volume":"15","author":"To","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1682","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.657278","article-title":"Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix","volume":"25","author":"Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.12.021","article-title":"Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length?","volume":"208","author":"Friedman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.022","article-title":"Prospective evaluation of a protocol for using transabdominal ultrasound to screen for short cervix","volume":"213","author":"Pandipati","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.013","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention","volume":"209","author":"Miller","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib29","unstructured":"Cervical Length Education and Review (CLEAR) program [Internet]. Available at: https:\/\/clear.perinatalquality.org. Accessed: February 8,\u00a02016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib30","unstructured":"Fetal Medicine Foundation Cervical Assessment Certification [Internet]. Available at: https:\/\/fetalmedicine.org\/cervical-assessment-1. Accessed: February 8,\u00a02016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.892","article-title":"Patient acceptance of transvaginal sonography in the early pregnancy unit setting","volume":"22","author":"Dutta","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00002-1","article-title":"Randomized trial of endovaginal ultrasound in preterm premature rupture of membranes","volume":"89","author":"Carlan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.012","article-title":"Frequency of uterine contractions in asymptomatic pregnant women with or without a short cervix on transvaginal ultrasound scan","volume":"191","author":"Berghella","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMcp1103640","article-title":"Clinical practice. Prevention of preterm parturition","volume":"370","author":"Iams","year":"2014","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.12.005","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis","volume":"202","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8911","article-title":"Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"38","author":"Werner","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.04.021","article-title":"Universal maternal cervical length screening during the second trimester: pros and cons of a strategy to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"207","author":"Parry","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000051","article-title":"Pros and cons of maternal cervical length screening to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"57","author":"Parry","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000428","article-title":"A\u00a0universal transvaginal cervical length screening program for preterm birth prevention","volume":"124","author":"Orzechowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.020","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm birth: an update","volume":"213","author":"Werner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"858","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a2dccd","article-title":"Short ultrasono- graphic cervical length in women with low-risk obstetric history","volume":"122","author":"Facco","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.08.029","article-title":"Is universal cervical length screening indicated in women with prior term birth?","volume":"212","author":"Orzechowski","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90618-8","article-title":"A\u00a0comprehensive program for cervical cancer detection and management","volume":"166","author":"Benedet","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.011","article-title":"Why the United States preterm birth rate is declining","volume":"213","author":"Schoen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib45","unstructured":"National Vital Statistics Reports Volume 64, Number 1, Center for Disease Control. Birth: Final data for 2013. January\u00a02015."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9073","article-title":"Universal cervical-length screening and vaginal progesterone prevents early preterm births, reduces neonatal morbidity and is cost saving: doing nothing is no longer\u00a0an\u00a0option","volume":"38","author":"Campbell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781502517X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781502517X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:06:40Z","timestamp":1757588800000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293781502517X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293781502517X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Universal cervical length screening in singleton gestations\u00a0without a previous preterm\u00a0birth: ten\u00a0reasons\u00a0why it should be\u00a0implemented","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}