{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,6]],"date-time":"2026-06-06T15:40:06Z","timestamp":1780760406072,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,1]],"date-time":"2016-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1456790400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,1]],"date-time":"2016-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1456790400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,27]],"date-time":"2016-02-27T14:01:10Z","timestamp":1456581670000},"page":"361.e1-361.e6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":99,"title":["Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending\u00a0the\u00a0time limit vs usual guidelines"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"214","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9358-8995","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexis C.","family":"Gimovsky","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincenzo","family":"Berghella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)38916-5","article-title":"The duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"63","author":"Hellman","year":"1952","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-195512000-00001","article-title":"Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis","volume":"6","author":"Friedman","year":"1955","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127142","article-title":"Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women","volume":"187","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044","article-title":"How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?","volume":"191","author":"Cheng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"113","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.003","article-title":"Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes","volume":"201","author":"Rouse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000278","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"124","author":"Laughon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib8","series-title":"Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin no.: 17","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"906","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90364-X","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration","volume":"173","author":"Menticoglou","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2011.10.001","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group\u00a0randomised trials","volume":"10","author":"Moher","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1532","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000136850.08972.07","article-title":"A\u00a0multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled epidural with intravenous analgesia for pain relief in labor","volume":"99","author":"Halpern","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2105","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.24.2105","article-title":"Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a\u00a0meta-analysis","volume":"280","author":"Halpern","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815025946?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937815025946?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:06:28Z","timestamp":1757588788000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937815025946"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937815025946"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending\u00a0the\u00a0time limit vs usual guidelines","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}