{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T14:59:52Z","timestamp":1787497192608,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]],"date-time":"2016-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1459468800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]],"date-time":"2016-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1459468800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100006108","name":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100006108","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100006108","name":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100006108","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["5T32HD055172-07"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["5T32HD055172-07"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["UL1 TR000448"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UL1 TR000448"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,10]],"date-time":"2016-02-10T13:07:12Z","timestamp":1455109632000},"page":"523.e1-523.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":64,"title":["Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"214","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0676-0081","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lorene A.","family":"Temming","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer K.","family":"Durst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Methodius G.","family":"Tuuli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Molly J.","family":"Stout","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey M.","family":"Dicke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"George A.","family":"Macones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alison G.","family":"Cahill","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: preliminary data for 2014","volume":"64","author":"Hamilton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(08)60074-4","article-title":"Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth","volume":"371","author":"Goldenberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.04.021","article-title":"Universal maternal cervical length screening during the second trimester: pros and cons of a strategy to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"207","author":"Parry","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","article-title":"The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network","volume":"334","author":"Iams","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa067815","article-title":"Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix","volume":"357","author":"Fonseca","year":"2007","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9017","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"38","author":"Hassan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.12.005","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis","volume":"202","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e318270d5b2","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth","volume":"67","author":"Berghella","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8911","article-title":"Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"38","author":"Werner","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000051","article-title":"Pros and cons of maternal cervical length screening to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery","volume":"57","author":"Parry","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b","article-title":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Practice bulletin no. 130","volume":"120","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib12","first-page":"963","article-title":"Use of progesterone to reduce preterm birth. ACOG Committee opinion no. 419, October 2008 (replaces no. 291, November 2003)","volume":"112","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1371710","article-title":"Implementation of a universal cervical length screening program for the prevention of preterm birth","volume":"31","author":"Orzechowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000428","article-title":"A\u00a0universal transvaginal cervical length screening program for preterm birth prevention","volume":"124","author":"Orzechowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.08.029","article-title":"Is universal cervical length\u00a0screening indicated in women with prior term birth?","volume":"212","author":"Orzechowski","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000864","article-title":"Second-trimester cervical length screening among asymptomatic women","volume":"126","author":"Miller","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/S0146-0005(03)00021-1","article-title":"What we have learned about cervical ultrasound","volume":"27","author":"Owen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib18","first-page":"CD007235","article-title":"Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery","volume":"1","author":"Berghella","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"858","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a2dccd","article-title":"Short ultrasonographic cervical length in women with low-risk obstetric history","volume":"122","author":"Facco","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.020","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of\u00a0transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm\u00a0birth: an update","volume":"213","author":"Werner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.01.065","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia and superimposed preeclampsia: do they differ?","volume":"204","author":"Tuuli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.035","article-title":"Prevalence and likelihood ratios for aneuploidy in\u00a0fetuses diagnosed prenatally with isolated congenital cardiac defects","volume":"201","author":"Tuuli","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f7496d","article-title":"Leiomyomas at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination and adverse obstetric outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Stout","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2410","article-title":"Is chorionic villus sampling associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy?","volume":"30","author":"Odibo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2749","article-title":"Revisiting the risk for aneuploidy in fetuses with isolated pyelectasis","volume":"31","author":"Carbone","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.09.872","article-title":"Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies","volume":"200","author":"Cahill","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816002854?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816002854?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:07:55Z","timestamp":1757588875000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937816002854"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937816002854"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.726157147.793534031","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}