{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T16:37:41Z","timestamp":1787503061326,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,30]],"date-time":"2016-04-30T02:36:04Z","timestamp":1461983764000},"page":"439-444","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":56,"title":["Toward normal birth\u2013but at what cost?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"215","author":[{"given":"Hans Peter","family":"Dietz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stuart","family":"Campbell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib1","unstructured":"Menacker F, Hamilton B. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. Available at: http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/data\/databriefs\/db35.pdf. Accessed Jan. 22,\u00a02012."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib2","unstructured":"NHS maternity statistics\u2013England, 2013-14.\u00a0Available at: http:\/\/www.hscic.gov.uk\/catalogue\/PUB16725. Accessed May 4, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib3","unstructured":"Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian mothers and babies 2011. Sydney; 2013. Available at: http:\/\/www.aihw.gov.au\/publication-detail\/?id=60129545702. Accessed May 4, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib4","unstructured":"Promoting normal birth and reducing caesarean section rates. Available at: http:\/\/www.institute.nhs.uk\/quality_and_value\/high_volume_care\/caesarean_section_-_promoting_normal_birth_and_reducing_caesarean_section_rates.html. Accessed May 17, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib5","unstructured":"Anonymous. Maternity: towards normal birth in NSW, in PD 2010-045, NSW Health, Sydney,\u00a02010. Available at: http:\/\/www0.health.nsw.gov.au\/policies\/pd\/2010\/PD2010_045.html. Accessed May 4, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric care consensus no. 1","volume":"123","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib7","unstructured":"Clinical Excellence Commission. Clinical focus report: vacuum-assisted births; are we getting it right? A focus on subgaleal hemorrhage. Sydney,\u00a02015. Available at: http:\/\/www.kidsfamilies.health.nsw.gov.au\/publications\/clinical-focus-report-vacuum-assisted-births-are-we-getting-it-right. Accessed May 4, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib8","unstructured":"Revill J. Officials \u201coverstated risks of cesarean delivery.\u201d Observer May 2,\u00a02004."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib9","first-page":"791","article-title":"Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery","volume":"102","author":"Joseph","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.024","article-title":"Degree of obesity at delivery and risk of preeclampsia with severe features","volume":"214","author":"Durst","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.031","article-title":"Prepregnancy body mass index in a first uncomplicated pregnancy and outcomes of a second pregnancy","volume":"213","author":"Tabet","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib12","unstructured":"Anonymous. AHRQ comparative effectiveness review no. 80. Rockville (MD): Department for Health and Human Services;\u00a02012."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib13","unstructured":"Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Maternal deaths low in Australia, Sydney, 2008.\u00a0Available at: http:\/\/www.aihw.gov.au\/media-release-detail\/?id=6442464747. Accessed May 17, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.07.019","article-title":"Risk-adjusted models for adverse obstetric outcomes and variation in risk-adjusted outcomes across hospitals","volume":"209","author":"Bailit","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E158","DOI":"10.9778\/cmajo.20140055","article-title":"Maternal and newborn outcomes after a prior cesarean birth by\u00a0planned mode of delivery and history of prior vaginal birth in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"3","author":"Bickford","year":"2015","journal-title":"CMAJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12229","article-title":"Improving VBAC rates: the combined impact of two management strategies","volume":"54","author":"Gardner","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03246.x","article-title":"The obstetric vacuum extractor is the instrument of first choice for operative vaginal delivery","volume":"96","author":"Chalmers","year":"1989","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib19","unstructured":"Anonymous. Krankenhausstatistik\u2013Grunddaten der Krankenh\u00e4user und Vorsorge\u2013oder Rehabilitationseinrichtungen, Statistisches Bundesamt, Bonn, Germany,\u00a02014. Available at: https:\/\/www.destatis.de\/DE\/ZahlenFakten\/GesellschaftStaat\/Gesundheit\/Krankenhaeuser\/Tabellen\/KrankenhausentbindungenKaiserschnittBundeslaender.html. Accessed May 4, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib20","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2013","volume":"64","author":"Martin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib21","unstructured":"Anonymous. NHS maternity statistics\u2013England, 2012-13. Available at: http:\/\/www.hscic.gov.uk\/catalogue\/PUB12744. Accessed Jan. 1,\u00a02015."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12199","article-title":"A\u00a0re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labor","volume":"120","author":"Tempest","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12511","article-title":"Kielland\u2019s forceps. From controversy to consensus?","volume":"94","author":"Nash","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e56","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001147","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery. Practice bulletin no. 154","volume":"126","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.035","article-title":"Comparison of \u201cinstrument-associated\u201d and \u201cspontaneous\u201d obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68 neonates","volume":"192","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib26","first-page":"CD005455","article-title":"Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery","volume":"11","author":"O\u2019Mahony","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12592","article-title":"Forceps: towards obsolescence or revival?","volume":"94","author":"Dietz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2007.00748.x","article-title":"Avulsion of\u00a0the pubovisceral muscle associated with large\u00a0vaginal tear after normal vaginal delivery at term","volume":"47","author":"Dietz","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0575-1","article-title":"Validity and reproducibility of the digital detection of levator trauma","volume":"19","author":"Dietz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20181","article-title":"Interrater reliability and physical examination of the pubovisceral portion of the levator ani muscle, validity comparisons using MR imaging","volume":"25","author":"Kearney","year":"2006","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1329-4","article-title":"Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of\u00a0the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound","volume":"22","author":"Dietz","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01751.x","article-title":"Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"115","author":"Dietz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000250901.57095.ba","article-title":"Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and\u00a0function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"109","author":"DeLancey","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7678","article-title":"Levator\u00a0avulsion is a risk factor for cystocele recurrence","volume":"36","author":"Dietz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib35","series-title":"The Principles and Practice of Obstetrics","author":"De Lee","year":"1938"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib36","first-page":"S53","article-title":"A Tale of Two Hospitals","volume":"35","author":"Atan","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"S1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13771","article-title":"The effect of replacing primary Vacuum delivery with Forceps","volume":"44","author":"Dietz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2002.0258","article-title":"Lower genital tract and anal sphincter trauma","volume":"16","author":"Sultan","year":"2002","journal-title":"Best Practice & Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12286","article-title":"Psychological and somatic sequelae of traumatic vaginal delivery: A literature review","volume":"55","author":"Skinner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2413-y","article-title":"Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009","volume":"26","author":"Lowenstein","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2741-6","article-title":"Response to the letter to the editor by HP Dietz","volume":"26","author":"Lowenstein","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2677-x","article-title":"The latency between pelvic floor trauma and presentation for prolapse repair: a retrospective observational study","volume":"26","author":"Thomas","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12020","article-title":"Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic\u00a0organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a\u00a0national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery","volume":"120","author":"Gyhagen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12075","article-title":"Childbirth and prolapse: long-term associations with the symptoms and objective measurements of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"120","author":"Glazener","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib45","unstructured":"Caesarean Section: NICE Clinical Guideline\u00a0132. 2011 [cited 22.1.2012]; Available at:\u00a0http:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/CG132\/documents\/caesarean-section-update-full-guideline2. Accessed\u00a0May 17, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1571","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13605","article-title":"Author's reply re: Caesarean section should be available on request","volume":"122","author":"Hull","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib47","unstructured":"Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation. 2015 [cited 3.6.15]; Available at: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications. Accessed May 17, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.926","article-title":"Second\u00a0Stage Labor: How long is too long?","volume":"214","author":"Leveno","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e108","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001151","article-title":"Limitations of perineal lacerations as an obstetric quality measure","volume":"126","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2546-z","article-title":"Pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma should be key performance indicators of maternity services","volume":"26","author":"Dietz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib51","unstructured":"Cumberlege J, et al. Better births: Improving\u00a0outcomes of maternity services in England. Available at: http:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/ourwork\/futurenhs\/mat-review. Accessed March 15, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.5694\/mja11.11064","article-title":"A plea for professional independence","volume":"196","author":"Dietz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d9f4b6","article-title":"Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality","volume":"115","author":"Srinivas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib54","unstructured":"Rogers v Whitaker. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1992. Available at: http:\/\/www.healthlawcentral.com\/rogers-v-whitaker\/. Accessed May 17, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib55","unstructured":"Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, 2015: London. Available at: https:\/\/www.supremecourt.uk\/decided-cases\/docs\/UKSC_2013_0136_Judgment.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1273","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13467","article-title":"The Montgomery Ruling extends patient autonomy","volume":"122","author":"Bolton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816300990?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816300990?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:09:49Z","timestamp":1757588989000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937816300990"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"references-count":56,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937816300990"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Toward normal birth\u2013but at what cost?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}