{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,4]],"date-time":"2025-12-04T05:52:19Z","timestamp":1764827539789,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,25]],"date-time":"2016-10-25T20:16:38Z","timestamp":1477426598000},"page":"583-587.e1","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Women should decide which conditions matter"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"215","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5967-1701","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mary E.","family":"Norton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miriam","family":"Kuppermann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000145","article-title":"Obstetric, perinatal, and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with false-positive integrated screening results","volume":"123","author":"Baer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001040","article-title":"Detection rates for aneuploidy by first-trimester and sequential screening","volume":"126","author":"Baer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1052","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181da93da","article-title":"First- and second-trimester maternal serum markers for aneuploidy and adverse obstetric outcomes","volume":"115","author":"Dugoff","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1589","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1407349","article-title":"Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy","volume":"372","author":"Norton","year":"2015","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000363","article-title":"Single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal screening in a high-risk and low-risk cohort","volume":"124","author":"Pergament","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4541","article-title":"Circulating cell free DNA testing: are some test failures informative?","volume":"35","author":"Palomaki","year":"2015","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.046","article-title":"Serum versus cfDNA screening: Where have all the trisomies gone?","volume":"215","author":"Palomaki","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.018","article-title":"Cell free DNA versus sequential screening for the detection of fetal chromosomal abnormalities","volume":"214","author":"Norton","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)66790-6","article-title":"Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment","volume":"366","author":"Caine","year":"2005","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000452","article-title":"Chromosome abnormalities detected by current prenatal screening and noninvasive prenatal testing","volume":"124","author":"Norton","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.5.1213","article-title":"International, collaborative assessment of 146,000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used","volume":"14","author":"Evans","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"year":"2001","series-title":"Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib12"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.984","article-title":"Beyond information: exploring patients' preferences","volume":"302","author":"Epstein","year":"2009","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib14","first-page":"511","article-title":"Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferences","volume":"96","author":"Kuppermann","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4808","article-title":"Preferences regarding contemporary prenatal genetic tests among women desiring testing: implications for optimal testing strategies","volume":"36","author":"Kuppermann","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.11479","article-title":"Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"312","author":"Kuppermann","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001029","article-title":"Prenatal testing in the genomic age: clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs","volume":"126","author":"Kaimal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14636","article-title":"Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"45","author":"Akolekar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001438","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 162: Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders","volume":"127","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816303908?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816303908?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:10:01Z","timestamp":1757589001000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937816303908"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937816303908"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0002-9378"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Women should decide which conditions matter","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.045","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}