{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T14:36:29Z","timestamp":1770993389557,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]],"date-time":"2016-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480550400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]],"date-time":"2016-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480550400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,24]],"date-time":"2016-11-24T03:01:31Z","timestamp":1479956491000},"page":"739-743.e1","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"215","author":[{"given":"David","family":"Stamilio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Laura M.","family":"Carlson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b","article-title":"Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Practice bulletin no. 130","volume":"120","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x","article-title":"Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population","volume":"50","author":"Stone","year":"2010","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1305","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2008.27.9.1305","article-title":"Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?","volume":"27","author":"Saul","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.12.021","article-title":"Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length?","volume":"208","author":"Friedman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib5","first-page":"473","article-title":"Can transabdominal cervical length measurement exclude short cervix?","volume":"33","author":"Rhoades","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00094.x","article-title":"Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks' scan: problems with transabdominal sonography","volume":"15","author":"To","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12204","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18-21 weeks' gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches","volume":"54","author":"Marren","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1682","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.657278","article-title":"Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix","volume":"25","author":"Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.013","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention","volume":"209","author":"Miller","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.12.005","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis","volume":"202","author":"Cahill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8911","article-title":"Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"38","author":"Werner","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e318270d5b2","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth","volume":"67","author":"Berghella","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00010.x","article-title":"Patient acceptance of endovaginal ultrasound","volume":"15","author":"Bennett","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1997.09020091.x","article-title":"Acceptability by patients of transvaginal sonography in the elective assessment of the first-trimester fetus","volume":"9","author":"Braithwaite","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1","article-title":"Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor","volume":"290","author":"Gauthier","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x","article-title":"Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography","volume":"17","author":"Cicero","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa067815","article-title":"Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix","volume":"357","author":"Fonseca","year":"2007","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9017","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"38","author":"Hassan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816304549?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937816304549?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:12:29Z","timestamp":1757589149000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937816304549"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937816304549"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}