{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]],"date-time":"2026-09-07T10:53:02Z","timestamp":1788778382807,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496275200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496275200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,8]],"date-time":"2017-02-08T10:16:32Z","timestamp":1486548992000},"page":"606.e1-606.e10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":110,"title":["Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"216","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2802-7670","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Asma","family":"Khalil","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jos\u00e9","family":"Morales-Rosello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Naila","family":"Khan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mintu","family":"Nath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Priya","family":"Agarwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amar","family":"Bhide","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aris","family":"Papageorghiou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Basky","family":"Thilaganathan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.039","article-title":"The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus","volume":"207","author":"Pilliod","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.1111","article-title":"Rates of and factors associated with delivery-related perinatal death among term infants in Scotland","volume":"302","author":"Pasupathy","year":"2009","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.233","article-title":"Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy","volume":"188","author":"Bukowski","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a265ab","article-title":"Antecedents of cerebral palsy and perinatal death in term and late preterm singletons","volume":"122","author":"McIntyre","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.034","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13020086.x","article-title":"Fetal growth rate and adverse perinatal events","volume":"13","author":"de Jong","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"193","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.833904","article-title":"Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories","volume":"27","author":"Deter","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2008.100","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at term in small-for-gestational age fetuses: comparison of growth velocity vs. customized assessment","volume":"36","author":"Iraola","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib11","first-page":"CD001451","article-title":"Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks\u2019 gestation)","author":"Bricker","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.035","article-title":"A\u00a0customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.09.006","article-title":"Customized large-for-gestational-age birthweight at term and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"210","author":"Sjaarda","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.02.031","article-title":"Variation in fetal ultrasound biometry based on differences in fetal ethnicity","volume":"200","author":"Ogasawara","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies","volume":"213","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4161","article-title":"Performance of the ultrasound examination in the early and late third trimester for the prediction of birth weight deviations","volume":"33","author":"Souka","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14755","article-title":"Impact on obstetric outcome of third-trimester screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"46","author":"Callec","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.34.5.837","article-title":"Estimation of the growth rate in fetuses with an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio compared to those with suspected growth restriction without evidence of centralization of blood flow","volume":"34","author":"Regan","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","article-title":"Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of fetal compromise and neonatal unit admisi\u00f3n?","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.013","article-title":"The association between fetal Doppler and admission to neonatal unit at term","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x","article-title":"Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"4","author":"Snijders","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x","article-title":"A\u00a0critical evaluation of sonar \u201ccrown-rump length\u201d measurements","volume":"82","author":"Robinson","year":"1975","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements, a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.019","article-title":"Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy","volume":"192","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2002.077","article-title":"Blood flow velocity waveforms of the fetal middle cerebral artery in a normal population: reference values from 18 weeks to 42 weeks of gestation","volume":"30","author":"Bahlmann","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited","volume":"21","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","article-title":"Fetal Doppler changes as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term","volume":"43","author":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3941","article-title":"Doppler changes in the vertebral, middle cerebral, and umbilical arteries in fetuses delivered after 34 weeks: relationship to severity of growth restriction","volume":"32","author":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-3782(87)90099-5","article-title":"New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks","volume":"15","author":"Yudkin","year":"1987","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib30","series-title":"Intrapartum care. NICE clinical guideline 55","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance","volume":"114","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","article-title":"Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study","volume":"208","author":"Prior","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15729","article-title":"Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib35","first-page":"249","article-title":"Fetal cerebro-placental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and diagnostic performance","volume":"44","author":"Nassr","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","article-title":"The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses","volume":"213","author":"DeVore","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib37","first-page":"85","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 12, January 2000","volume":"72","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib38","series-title":"The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Green-top guideline number 31","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","article-title":"Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status in term small-for- gestational-age fetuses","volume":"117","author":"Cruz-Martinez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","article-title":"Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"79","author":"Gramellini","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90398-0","article-title":"Accuracy of the middle-cerebral-to-umbilical-artery resistance index ratio in the prediction of neonatal outcome in patients at high risk for fetal and neonatal complications","volume":"171","author":"Arias","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00262-9","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery resistance index ratio in the prediction of neonatal outcome","volume":"71","author":"Makhseed","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib44","first-page":"821","article-title":"Middle cerebral\/umbilical artery resistance index ratio as sensitive parameter for fetal well-being and neonatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia: case-control study","volume":"46","author":"Ebrashy","year":"2005","journal-title":"Croat Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870210808","article-title":"Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: Analysis of inter- and intra-observer variability","volume":"21","author":"Chang","year":"1993","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition for placental fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2038","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00148-8","article-title":"Should serial fetal biometry be used in all pregnancies?","volume":"386","author":"Romero","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817301825?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817301825?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:14:23Z","timestamp":1757589263000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937817301825"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937817301825"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}