{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,19]],"date-time":"2026-09-19T00:09:44Z","timestamp":1789776584513,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":84,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,20]],"date-time":"2017-04-20T04:48:02Z","timestamp":1492663682000},"page":"198.e1-198.e11","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["The clinical significance of an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile: a comparison of outcomes of &lt;5th vs 5th\u20139th percentile"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"217","author":[{"given":"Malgorzata","family":"Mlynarczyk","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suneet P.","family":"Chauhan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hind A.","family":"Baydoun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine M.","family":"Wilkes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kimberly R.","family":"Earhart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yili","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher","family":"Goodier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eugene","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole M.","family":"Lee Plenty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E. Kaitlyn","family":"Mize","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michelle","family":"Owens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shilpa","family":"Babbar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dev","family":"Maulik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emily","family":"DeFranco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"McKinney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alfred Z.","family":"Abuhamad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib1","first-page":"1030","article-title":"Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best?","volume":"80","author":"Chang","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70095-5","article-title":"Receiver operating characteristic curves of ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight for prediction of fetal growth restriction in prolonged pregnancies","volume":"181","author":"O\u2019Reilly-Green","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00836-6","article-title":"Doppler predictors of adverse neonatal outcome in the growth restricted fetus at 34 weeks\u2019 gestation or beyond","volume":"189","author":"Vergani","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600798267","article-title":"Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%","volume":"19","author":"Chauhan","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.027","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of intrauterine growth restriction: relationship to neonatal body composition","volume":"205","author":"Law","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.007","article-title":"Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study","volume":"208","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.12.004","article-title":"Approximately one-third of medically indicated late preterm births are complicated by fetal growth restriction","volume":"204","author":"Carreno","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth studies","volume":"213","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib9","first-page":"523","article-title":"Early term versus term delivery in the management of fetal growth restriction: a comparison of two protocols","volume":"32","author":"Dahlke","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.035","article-title":"A\u00a0customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.816","article-title":"Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study","volume":"194","author":"Ego","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.034","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management","volume":"204","author":"Figueras","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.014","article-title":"Customized estimated fetal weight: a novel antenatal tool to diagnose abnormal fetal growth","volume":"20","author":"Kase","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.931","article-title":"INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity","volume":"214","author":"Anderson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70475-2","article-title":"Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard?","volume":"178","author":"Seeds","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"211","author":"Crimmins","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00010","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"Chauhan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.08.025","article-title":"Mortality and morbidity in preterm small-for-gestational-age infants: a population-based study","volume":"206","author":"Grisaru-Granovsky","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1571","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.069","article-title":"Fetal growth risk curves: defining levels of fetal growth restriction by neonatal death risk","volume":"195","author":"Boulet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.036","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates","volume":"191","author":"Garite","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1234","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199904223401603","article-title":"Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants","volume":"340","author":"McIntire","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.043","article-title":"Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies","volume":"215","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib25","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. ACOG practice bulletin no. 134: Fetal growth restriction. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist;\u00a02013."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022","article-title":"Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"206","author":"Berkley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-972926","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios among high-risk patients","volume":"24","author":"Chauhan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90150-5","article-title":"The clinical significance of Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in the small for gestational age fetus","volume":"156","author":"Rochelson","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.95.4.534","article-title":"The small for gestational age infant: accelerated or delayed pulmonary maturation? Increased or decrease survival?","volume":"95","author":"Tyson","year":"1995","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.030","article-title":"Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"208","author":"Trudell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.01.010","article-title":"Relationship between abnormal fetal testing and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"196","author":"Gonzalez","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.039","article-title":"The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus","volume":"207","author":"Pilliod","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib33","first-page":"323","article-title":"Morbidity and mortality in small-for-gestational-age infants: a secondary analysis of nine MFMU Network studies","volume":"34","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.040","article-title":"Aberrant fetal growth and early, late, and postneonatal mortality: an analysis of Milwaukee births, 1996-2007","volume":"204","author":"Chen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.11.048","article-title":"Predictors of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm growth-restricted neonates","volume":"198","author":"Manogura","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00008","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"Pallotto","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1159\/000353631","article-title":"Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction","volume":"36","author":"Baschat","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.05.026","article-title":"Severe small size for gestational age and cognitive function: catch-up phenomenon possible","volume":"207","author":"Paulson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.044","article-title":"Autism risk in small- and large-for-gestational-age infants","volume":"206","author":"Moore","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2004.tb00236.x","article-title":"The developmental origins of chronic adult disease","volume":"93","author":"Barker","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr Suppl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70188-7","article-title":"Ultrasonographic estimate of birth weight at 24 to 34 weeks: a multicenter study","volume":"179","author":"Chauhan","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500223465","article-title":"A\u00a0review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy","volume":"18","author":"Chauhan","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib43","first-page":"951","article-title":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists no. 98, October 2008 (replaces Practice Bulletin number 58, December 2004): Ultrasonography in pregnancy","volume":"112","author":"Abuhamad","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib44","unstructured":"Green-top Guideline No. 31. London, UK: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; February 2013, Minor revisions \u2013 January 2014. Available at: http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/gtg_31.pdf. Accessed March 20,\u00a02016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00386-X","article-title":"A\u00a0United States national reference for fetal growth","volume":"87","author":"Alexander","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000345","article-title":"A\u00a0revised birth weight reference for the United States","volume":"124","author":"Duryea","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4037","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae","volume":"30","author":"Anderson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib49","first-page":"908","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction: a mathematical model of the effect of time interval and ultrasound error","volume":"92","author":"Mongelli","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib50","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. ACOG practice bulletin no. 33: Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist;\u00a02002."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3476(78)80282-0","article-title":"Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm","volume":"92","author":"Papile","year":"1978","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2008.141","article-title":"Platelet reference ranges for neonates, defined using data from over 47,000 patients in a multihospital healthcare system","volume":"29","author":"Wiedmeier","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00118-5","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction at term: myth or reality?","volume":"92","author":"Minior","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib54","first-page":"187","article-title":"Prenatal detection of fetal growth restriction in newborns classified as small for gestational age: correlates and risk of neonatal morbidity","volume":"31","author":"Chauhan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13148","article-title":"Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study","volume":"122","author":"Monier","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12251","article-title":"Does the presence of risk factors for fetal growth restriction increase the probability of antenatal detection? A French National Study","volume":"30","author":"Monier","year":"2016","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.033","article-title":"Defining the residual risk of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with normal umbilical artery blood flow","volume":"211","author":"O\u2019Dwyer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.11.1008","volume":"216","author":"Monteith","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.014","article-title":"Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"208","author":"Von Beckerath","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.06.007","article-title":"The association of cerebral palsy and death with small-for-gestational-age birthweight in preterm neonates by individualized and population-based percentiles","volume":"209","author":"Grobman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.057","article-title":"Racial disparities in stillbirth risk across gestation in the United States","volume":"201","author":"Willinger","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"862","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.029","article-title":"Risk factors for neonatal mortality among extremely-low-birth-weight infants","volume":"192","author":"Bacak","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105444","article-title":"Nucleated red blood cell count in the differentiation of fetuses with pathologic growth restriction from healthy small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"182","author":"Minior","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1053\/ob.1996.v175.a73600","article-title":"Adjustment of birth weight standards for maternal and infant characteristics improves the prediction of outcome in the small-for-gestational-age infant","volume":"175","author":"Sciscione","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib66","first-page":"409","article-title":"Small for gestational age: the differential mortality when detected versus undetected antenatally","volume":"34","author":"Larkin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1552939","article-title":"Differential morbidity in preterm small versus appropriate for gestational age: perhaps unverifiable","volume":"32","author":"Marrs","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000737","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes with normal compared with elevated umbilical artery systolic-to-diastolic ratios in fetal growth restriction","volume":"125","author":"Maggio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A\u00a0randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13190","article-title":"Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE)","volume":"42","author":"Lees","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib73","first-page":"1","article-title":"Pregnancies complicated by both preeclampsia and growth restriction between 34 and 37 weeks\u2019 gestation are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"10","author":"Sharma","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.3389\/fped.2014.00118","article-title":"The efficacy of surfactant replacement therapy in the growth-restricted preterm infant: what is the evidence?","volume":"2","author":"Malhotra","year":"2014","journal-title":"Front Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib75","series-title":"Recent declines in infant mortality in the United States, 2005\u20132011. NCHS data brief, no 120","author":"MacDorman","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.027","article-title":"Optimal fetal growth: a misconception?","volume":"213","author":"Hanson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2003.10.011","article-title":"Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control","volume":"28","author":"Deter","year":"2004","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1159\/000074262","article-title":"Identification of macrosomic, normal and intrauterine growth retarded neonates using the modified Neonatal Growth Assessment Score","volume":"19","author":"Deter","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001633","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001633","article-title":"Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case-control study","volume":"11","author":"Bukowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17347","article-title":"International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st project","volume":"49","author":"Stirnemann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth\u00a0based on serial ultrasound measurements the Fetal Growth Longitudinal study of\u00a0the\u00a0INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.002","article-title":"Monitoring human growth and development: a continuum from the womb to the classroom","volume":"213","author":"Villar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib83","first-page":"33","article-title":"Screening for intrauterine growth restriction in uncomplicated pregnancies: time for action","volume":"30","author":"Chauhan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2038","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00148-8","article-title":"Should serial fetal biometry be used in all pregnancies?","volume":"386","author":"Romero","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817305215?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817305215?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:16:26Z","timestamp":1757589386000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937817305215"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"references-count":84,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937817305215"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The clinical significance of an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile: a comparison of outcomes of <5th vs 5th\u20139th percentile","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}