{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T20:53:39Z","timestamp":1769633619966,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,1]],"date-time":"2017-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1509494400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,1]],"date-time":"2017-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1509494400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,27]],"date-time":"2017-07-27T15:00:33Z","timestamp":1501167633000},"page":"570.e1-570.e6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"217","author":[{"given":"Lina","family":"Antoun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Janesh K.","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T. Justin","family":"Clark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.2307\/2673719","article-title":"Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996","volume":"33","author":"MacKay","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fam Plann Perspect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02450.x","article-title":"The incidence of sterilization in the UK","volume":"110","author":"Rowlands","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"60","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib3","first-page":"1","article-title":"Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006-2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995","author":"Jones","year":"2012","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11539.x","article-title":"Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicenter observational study","volume":"104","author":"Jansen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib8","author":"Roberts"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib9","first-page":"84","article-title":"Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of Essure permanent birth control system and Adiana permanent contraception system","volume":"2","author":"Palmer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.035","article-title":"Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique","volume":"190","author":"Jansen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.04.017","article-title":"Hysteroscopic Essure inserts for permanent contraception: extended follow-up results of a phase III multicenter international study","volume":"22","author":"Chudnoff","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.043","article-title":"Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010","volume":"180","author":"Fernandez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.12.129","article-title":"Twelve-year retrospective review of unintended pregnancies after Essure sterilization in the Netherlands","volume":"105","author":"Hitzerd","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2004.12.009","article-title":"Ultrasound: an effective method for localization of the echogenic Essure sterilization micro-insert: correlation with radiologic evaluations","volume":"12","author":"Kerin","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1733","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.05.047","article-title":"Follow-up of successful bilateral placement of Essure microinserts with ultrasound","volume":"84","author":"Veersema","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h5162","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h5162","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study","volume":"351","author":"Mao","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001615","article-title":"Gynecologic outcomes after hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization procedures","volume":"128","author":"Perkins","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.2165\/11591290-000000000-00000","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"71","author":"Stoddard","year":"2011","journal-title":"Drugs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000422","article-title":"Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal","volume":"124","author":"Creinin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2008.03.004","article-title":"Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population","volume":"15","author":"Shavell","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.019","article-title":"Improving hysterosalpingogram confirmatory test follow-up after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"81","author":"Guiahi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817308530?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817308530?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:15:19Z","timestamp":1757589319000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937817308530"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937817308530"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Crown Copyright \u00a9 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}