{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T00:57:31Z","timestamp":1790384251300,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,9]],"date-time":"2017-11-09T02:15:24Z","timestamp":1510193724000},"page":"236.e1-236.e9","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":46,"title":["Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"218","author":[{"given":"Blair","family":"Dina","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Leah J.","family":"Peipert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qiuhong","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8546-1943","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jeffrey F.","family":"Peipert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"83","author":"Trussell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.003","article-title":"Two-year continuation of intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants in a mixed-payer setting: a retrospective review","volume":"216","author":"Sanders","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.001","article-title":"Three-year continuation of reversible contraception","volume":"213","author":"Diedrich","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib4","first-page":"1","article-title":"Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013","volume":"86","author":"Daniels","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1783\/147118906776276170","article-title":"What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study","volume":"32","author":"Asker","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.11.004","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of the insertion pain associated with three different types of intrauterine device","volume":"129","author":"Wiebe","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(86)90057-0","article-title":"Severe pain at interval IUD insertion: a case-control analysis of patient risk factors","volume":"34","author":"Chi","year":"1986","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.022","article-title":"Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen","volume":"195","author":"Hubacher","year":"2006","journal-title":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2015.1031885","article-title":"Patients\u2019 experiences and providers\u2019 observations on pain during intrauterine device insertion","volume":"20","author":"Akintomide","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.868424","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective cohort study of pain with intrauterine device insertion among women with and without vaginal deliveries","volume":"34","author":"Allen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000362","article-title":"Predicting painful or difficult intrauterine device insertion in nulligravid women","volume":"124","author":"Kaislasuo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib12","first-page":"65","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"3","author":"Goldstuck","year":"1985","journal-title":"Clin Reprod Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1783\/147118903101197539","article-title":"Use and effectiveness of oral analgesia when fitting an intrauterine device","volume":"29","author":"Murty","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.05.009","article-title":"Effect of an atraumatic vulsellum versus a single-tooth tenaculum on pain perception during intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"92","author":"Doty","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(77)90075-0","article-title":"The effects of psychological preparation on pain at intrauterine device insertion","volume":"16","author":"Newton","year":"1977","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.017","article-title":"The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"203","author":"Secura","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.11.006","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of anticipatory and postprocedure pain perception in patients who undergo urodynamic procedures","volume":"190","author":"Ellerkmann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib18","first-page":"1518","article-title":"The effects of intraurethral lidocaine anesthetic and patient anxiety on pain perception during cystoscopy","volume":"151","author":"Stein","year":"1994","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2000.01627.x","article-title":"Patient satisfaction with urodynamics: a qualitation study","volume":"32","author":"Shaw","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Adv Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib20","first-page":"154","article-title":"Dysmenorrhea","volume":"30","author":"Dawood","year":"1985","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-0966-7","article-title":"Severity of pain and circadian changes in uterine artery blood flow in primary dysmenorrhea","volume":"280","author":"Celik","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1966","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2011.03.029","article-title":"Dysmenorrhoea is associated with central changes in otherwise healthy women","volume":"152","author":"Vincent","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1039\/C2MB25238D","article-title":"Biomarkers of primary dysmenorrhea and herbal formula intervention: an exploratory metabonomics study of blood plasma and urine","volume":"9","author":"Liu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Mol Biosyst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2661","DOI":"10.1517\/14656566.9.15.2661","article-title":"Dysmenorrhea in adolescents and young adults: from pathophysiology to pharmacological treatments and management strategies","volume":"9","author":"Harel","year":"2008","journal-title":"Expert Opin Pharmacother"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.12703\/P6-113","article-title":"Recent advances in contraception","volume":"6","author":"Aiken","year":"2014","journal-title":"F1000Prime Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.011","article-title":"Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: a randomized double-blind controlled trial","volume":"95","author":"Abbas","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-100917","article-title":"Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix\u00a0reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial","volume":"42","author":"Aksoy","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Fam Plan Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib28","first-page":"CD007373","article-title":"Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion","volume":"7","author":"Lopez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001596","article-title":"Self-administered lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"128","author":"Rapkin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2017.1285881","article-title":"Lidocaine gel vs lidocaine spray in reducing pain during insertion of the intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"22","author":"Torky","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13308","article-title":"Lidocaine for pain control during intrauterine device insertion","volume":"43","author":"Karasu","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1306","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001746","article-title":"Naproxen Sodium For Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial","volume":"128","author":"Ngo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000912","article-title":"Ketorolac for pain control with intrauterine device placement: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"126","author":"Ngo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.02.001","article-title":"Diclofenac plus lidocaine gel for pain relief during intrauterine device insertion. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study","volume":"93","author":"Fouda","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.01.003","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial","volume":"95","author":"Abdellah","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.04.014","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial of nitrous oxide for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women","volume":"135","author":"Singh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.03.012","article-title":"The effect of nitroglycerin on the IUD insertion experience in nulliparous women: a pilot study","volume":"90","author":"Micks","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.012","article-title":"Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial","volume":"91","author":"Bednarek","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817312097?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817312097?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,23]],"date-time":"2025-03-23T08:10:55Z","timestamp":1742717455000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937817312097"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937817312097"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}