{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]],"date-time":"2026-09-07T10:53:03Z","timestamp":1788778383489,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,31]],"date-time":"2017-10-31T14:33:44Z","timestamp":1509460424000},"page":"134.e1-134.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: an internally validated prediction model"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"218","author":[{"given":"Erkan","family":"Kalafat","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jose","family":"Morales-Rosello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Basky","family":"Thilaganathan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fathema","family":"Tahera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Asma","family":"Khalil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.034","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14758","article-title":"Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise?","volume":"46","author":"Prior","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","article-title":"Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study","volume":"208","author":"Prior","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","article-title":"Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?","volume":"216","author":"Khalil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","article-title":"Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03334.x","article-title":"A\u00a0clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery","volume":"119","author":"Schuit","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x","article-title":"A\u00a0critical evaluation of sonar \u201ccrown-rump length\u201d measurements","volume":"82","author":"Robinson","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.152.2.6739822","article-title":"Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters","volume":"152","author":"Hadlock","year":"1984","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2013a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.019","article-title":"Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy","volume":"192","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2002.077","article-title":"Blood flow velocity waveforms of the fetal middle cerebral artery in a normal population: reference values from 18 weeks to 42 weeks of gestation","volume":"30","author":"Bahlmann","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12371","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics","volume":"41","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-5629(87)90166-9","article-title":"Exploration of the fetal cerebral blood flow by duplex Doppler\u2013linear array system in normal and pathological pregnancies","volume":"13","author":"Arbeille","year":"1987","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited","volume":"21","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","article-title":"Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term","volume":"43","author":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17287","article-title":"Birth weight in live births and stillbirths","volume":"48","author":"Poon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib19","series-title":"Intrapartum care. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guideline 55","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance","volume":"114","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","article-title":"Fetal brain\u00a0Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for\u00a0non-reassuring fetal\u00a0status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"117","author":"Cruz-Mart\u00ednez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib22","first-page":"249","article-title":"Fetal cerebro-placental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and diagnostic performance","volume":"44","author":"Nassr","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1239","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823835d3","article-title":"Mode of delivery in nulliparous women and neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"118","author":"Werner","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib25","first-page":"14","article-title":"Vacuum assisted birth and risk for cerebral complications in term newborn infants: a population-based cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Ek\u00e9us","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.07.041","article-title":"Mode of delivery has an independent impact on neonatal condition at birth","volume":"181","author":"Prior","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817312152?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817312152?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:17:53Z","timestamp":1757589473000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937817312152"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937817312152"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: an internally validated prediction model","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}