{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T07:21:59Z","timestamp":1790493719019,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":100,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,5]],"date-time":"2018-02-05T19:17:25Z","timestamp":1517858245000},"page":"S700-S711.e1","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":86,"special_numbering":"S","title":["Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"218","author":[{"given":"Liran","family":"Hiersch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2704-1385","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nir","family":"Melamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.007","article-title":"Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth\u00a0restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO study","volume":"208","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35129-5","article-title":"Screening, diagnosis, and management of intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"34","author":"Lausman","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib4","first-page":"307","article-title":"Guidelines on fetal growth restriction: a comparison of recent national publications","volume":"32","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.11.025","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines","volume":"200","author":"Chauhan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1522","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206043262303","article-title":"Mortality among infants of black as compared with white college-educated parents","volume":"326","author":"Schoendorf","year":"1992","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1234","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199904223401603","article-title":"Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants","volume":"340","author":"McIntire","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1802","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa044160","article-title":"Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults","volume":"353","author":"Barker","year":"2005","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyi048","article-title":"Size at birth as a predictor of mortality in adulthood: a follow-up of 350,000 person-years","volume":"34","author":"Kajantie","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib10","first-page":"335","article-title":"Population versus customized fetal growth norms and adverse outcomes in an intrapartum cohort","volume":"30","author":"Costantine","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001674","article-title":"Antenatal corticosteroids and outcomes of small-for-gestational-age neonates","volume":"128","author":"Melamed","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)62269-6","article-title":"Stillbirths: what difference can we make and at what cost?","volume":"377","author":"Bhutta","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2007.07.002","article-title":"Prediction and perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction","volume":"12","author":"Breeze","year":"2007","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001890","article-title":"Recurrent placenta-mediated complications in women with three consecutive deliveries","volume":"129","author":"Hiersch","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.770460","article-title":"The association between low 50 g glucose challenge test result and fetal growth restriction","volume":"26","author":"Melamed","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1159\/000445114","article-title":"Protein S100beta in late-pregnancy fetuses with low birth weight and abnormal cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"41","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1268578","article-title":"The magnitude of elevated maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy complications","volume":"37","author":"Sharony","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14861","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks","volume":"46","author":"Bakalis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14863","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks","volume":"46","author":"Bakalis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14899","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal serum biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks","volume":"46","author":"Lesmes","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14904","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks","volume":"46","author":"Poon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00004","article-title":"Fetal growth compromise: definitions, standards, and classification","volume":"49","author":"Maulik","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.11.022","article-title":"Definition and management of fetal growth restriction: a survey of contemporary attitudes","volume":"174","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1159\/000443881","article-title":"Prediction of small for gestational age: accuracy of different sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas","volume":"40","author":"Gabbay-Benziv","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.16003","article-title":"Re: Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome of small-for-gestational-age pregnancy using size centiles and conditional growth centiles. Karlsen HO, Johnsen SL, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:217-23","volume":"48","author":"Melamed","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.02058","article-title":"Choice of formula and accuracy of fetal weight estimation in small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"35","author":"Melamed","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002228","article-title":"Customized and noncustomized birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland","volume":"14","author":"Iliodromiti","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e170","DOI":"10.3109\/17477166.2010.519389","article-title":"Predicting the risk of newborn children to become overweight later in childhood: the PIAMA birth cohort study","volume":"6","author":"Steur","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Pediatr Obes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09516.x","article-title":"Standards for ultrasound fetal growth velocity","volume":"103","author":"Owen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2231010876","article-title":"US evaluation of fetal growth: prediction of neonatal outcomes","volume":"223","author":"Smith-Bindman","year":"2002","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2598","article-title":"Z-velocity in screening for intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"26","author":"Mondry","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1015981","article-title":"Average fetal weekly weight gain: a novel measure of fetal growth velocity","volume":"29","author":"Mongelli","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1084","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5145","article-title":"A\u00a0reference range of fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks gestation","volume":"37","author":"Silvia","year":"2017","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-3782(91)90030-7","article-title":"Growth velocity of the biparietal diameter, abdominal transverse diameter and femur length in the fetal period","volume":"27","author":"Guihard-Costa","year":"1991","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870200604","article-title":"Growth standards for anatomic measurements and growth rates derived from longitudinal studies of normal fetal growth","volume":"20","author":"Deter","year":"1992","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F10","DOI":"10.1136\/fn.74.1.F10","article-title":"Fetal growth velocity: kinetic, clinical, and biological aspects","volume":"74","author":"Bertino","year":"1996","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780141303","article-title":"Calculation of unconditional and conditional reference intervals for fetal size and growth from longitudinal measurements","volume":"14","author":"Royston","year":"1995","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.06050307.x","article-title":"Design and analysis of longitudinal studies of fetal size","volume":"6","author":"Royston","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.11020110.x","article-title":"Conditional centiles for the quantification of fetal growth","volume":"11","author":"Owen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4019","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range","volume":"29","author":"Salomon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15835","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome of small-for-gestational-age pregnancy using size centiles and conditional growth centiles","volume":"48","author":"Karlsen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib42","article-title":"Second to third trimester longitudinal growth assessment for the prediction of SGA and late FGR","author":"Caradeux","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0164161","article-title":"Single and serial fetal biometry to detect preterm and term small- and large-for-gestational-age neonates: a longitudinal cohort study","volume":"11","author":"Tarca","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4405","article-title":"A\u00a0linear mixed model for predicting a binary event from longitudinal data under random effects misspecification","volume":"31","author":"Albert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2003.10.011","article-title":"Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control","volume":"28","author":"Deter","year":"2004","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.833904","article-title":"Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories","volume":"27","author":"Deter","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05020114.x","article-title":"Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?","volume":"5","author":"Stratton","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib48","first-page":"499","article-title":"Interval between fetal measurements in predicting growth restriction","volume":"97","author":"Owen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90545-2","article-title":"Longitudinal studies of fetal growth with the use of dynamic image ultrasonography","volume":"143","author":"Deter","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1817","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199812173392504","article-title":"First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight","volume":"339","author":"Smith","year":"1998","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2009.28.5.617","article-title":"Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used?","volume":"28","author":"Melamed","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8954","article-title":"Narrowed beam width in newer ultrasound machines shortens measurements in the lateral direction: fetal measurement charts may be obsolete","volume":"38","author":"Okland","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10082","article-title":"Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements","volume":"39","author":"Sarris","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a112321","article-title":"The effect of regression to the mean in epidemiologic and clinical studies","volume":"104","author":"Davis","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib55","first-page":"230","article-title":"Identification of fetal growth retardation: comparison of Doppler waveform indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and fetal weight","volume":"82","author":"Chang","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11496.x","article-title":"Fetal size and growth velocity in the prediction of intrapartum cesarean section for fetal distress","volume":"104","author":"Owen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10155.x","article-title":"Fetal growth velocity in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation in a low risk population","volume":"105","author":"Owen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13020086.x","article-title":"Fetal growth rate and adverse perinatal events","volume":"13","author":"de Jong","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00236.x","article-title":"Using unconditional and conditional standard deviation scores of fetal abdominal area measurements in the prediction of intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"16","author":"Owen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02371.x","article-title":"Prediction of intrauterine growth restriction with customized estimated fetal weight centiles","volume":"110","author":"Owen","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318187d034","article-title":"Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome","volume":"112","author":"Pedersen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2010.01101.x","article-title":"The predictive ability of conditional fetal growth percentiles","volume":"24","author":"Hutcheon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwv310","article-title":"Small size at birth or abnormal intrauterine growth trajectory: which matters more for child growth?","volume":"183","author":"Hutcheon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2008.100","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at term in small-for-gestational age fetuses: comparison of growth velocity vs customized assessment","volume":"36","author":"Iraola","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","article-title":"Is\u00a0cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?","volume":"216","author":"Khalil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12550.x","article-title":"Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation","volume":"84","author":"Campbell","year":"1977","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-198208000-00001","article-title":"The timing factor in the pathophysiology of the intrauterine growth retardation syndrome","volume":"37","author":"Villar","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/S0095-5108(18)30836-4","article-title":"Assessment of fetal growth","volume":"13","author":"Lockwood","year":"1986","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05040256.x","article-title":"The head-to-abdomen circumference ratio: a reappraisal","volume":"5","author":"David","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib71","first-page":"1044","article-title":"Current concepts of fetal growth restriction: part I. Causes, classification, and pathophysiology","volume":"92","author":"Lin","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10363.x","article-title":"Head circumference\/abdominal circumference ratio, ponderal index and fetal malnutrition. Should head circumference\/abdominal circumference ratio be abandoned?","volume":"98","author":"Colley","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x","article-title":"Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks' gestation","volume":"4","author":"Snijders","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib74","first-page":"321","article-title":"Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes","volume":"96","author":"Dashe","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1535","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)91433-W","article-title":"Comparison of associated high-risk factors and perinatal outcome between symmetric and asymmetric fetal intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"164","author":"Lin","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.046","article-title":"Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement with particular emphasis in the third trimester: a reliable predictor of gestational age","volume":"191","author":"Chavez","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.062","article-title":"Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twins","volume":"195","author":"Chavez","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.03.025","article-title":"Assessment of fetal growth using the ratio of the transverse cerebellar diameter to abdominal circumference","volume":"135","author":"Agrawal","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90111-6","article-title":"Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal growth and development","volume":"156","author":"Goldstein","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib80","first-page":"893","article-title":"Transverse cerebellar diameter\/abdominal circumference ratio throughout pregnancy: a gestational age-independent method to assess fetal growth","volume":"77","author":"Campbell","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1993.12.7.379","article-title":"The fetal transverse cerebellar diameter\/abdominal circumference ratio: a gestational age-independent method of assessing fetal size","volume":"12","author":"Meyer","year":"1993","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1044","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90467-6","article-title":"Transverse cerebellar diameter: a useful predictor of gestational age for fetuses with asymmetric growth retardation","volume":"165","author":"Lee","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870220807","article-title":"Use of the transverse cerebellar diameter\/abdominal circumference ratio in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"22","author":"Campbell","year":"1994","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90035-3","article-title":"Ultrasonographic detection of abnormal\u00a0fetal growth with the gestational age-independent, transverse cerebellar diameter\/abdominal circumference ratio","volume":"171","author":"Meyer","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1159\/000264279","article-title":"Transverse cerebellar diameter and transverse cerebellar diameter\/abdominal circumference index for assessing fetal growth","volume":"11","author":"Dilmen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970141202","article-title":"Intrauterine growth retardation and fetal transverse cerebellar diameter","volume":"14","author":"Snijders","year":"1994","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.141.5.979","article-title":"A\u00a0date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: femur length\/abdominal circumference ratio","volume":"141","author":"Hadlock","year":"1983","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1097\/00004424-198510000-00012","article-title":"FL\/AC ratio: poor predictor of intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"20","author":"Benson","year":"1985","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13286","article-title":"Danish Fetal Medicine Study Group. Outcome of fetuses with short femur length detected at second-trimester anomaly scan: a national survey","volume":"44","author":"Mathiesen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1159\/000375446","article-title":"Midtrimester isolated short femur length as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome","volume":"38","author":"Aviram","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0128820","article-title":"Isolated short fetal femur length in the second trimester and the association with adverse perinatal outcome: experiences from a tertiary referral center","volume":"10","author":"Mailath-Pokorny","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5265","article-title":"Outcome of fetuses with antenatally diagnosed short femur","volume":"31","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709083036","article-title":"Longitudinal ultrasonic biometry of various parameters in fetuses with abnormal growth rate","volume":"66","author":"Basel","year":"1987","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90491-Z","article-title":"Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities","volume":"168","author":"Snijders","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01445.x","article-title":"Umbilical and uterine artery flow velocity waveforms in pregnancy associated with major fetal abnormality","volume":"92","author":"Trudinger","year":"1985","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90147-5","article-title":"The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms","volume":"156","author":"Rochelson","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1159\/000293651","article-title":"Umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveforms and associations with fetal abnormality","volume":"27","author":"Hata","year":"1989","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib98","first-page":"451","article-title":"Placental pathology in relation to uterine artery Doppler findings in pregnancies with severe intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler changes","volume":"34","author":"Levytska","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34956-8","article-title":"Utility of head\/abdomen circumference ratio in the evaluation of severe early-onset intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"33","author":"al Riyami","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7605","article-title":"Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction","volume":"35","author":"Proctor","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817324894?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817324894?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:21:26Z","timestamp":1757589686000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937817324894"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"references-count":100,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937817324894"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}