{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,14]],"date-time":"2026-03-14T22:07:15Z","timestamp":1773526035889,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":79,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,5]],"date-time":"2018-02-05T19:17:36Z","timestamp":1517858256000},"page":"S679-S691.e4","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"special_numbering":"S","title":["A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB\/NICHD Detroit study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"218","author":[{"given":"Adi L.","family":"Tarca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roberto","family":"Romero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dereje W.","family":"Gudicha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Offer","family":"Erez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Edgar","family":"Hernandez-Andrade","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lami","family":"Yeo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gaurav","family":"Bhatti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Percy","family":"Pacora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eli","family":"Maymon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sonia S.","family":"Hassan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1984.3.7.321","article-title":"A\u00a0longitudinal study of fetal weight\u00a0growth","volume":"3","author":"Jeanty","year":"1984","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1002\/ajhb.10204","article-title":"Timing is everything: a reconsideration of fetal growth velocity patterns identifies the importance of individual and sex differences","volume":"15","author":"Lampl","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Hum Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib3","series-title":"Fetus into man","author":"Tanner","year":"1978"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib4","series-title":"Development in infancy: a contemporary introduction","author":"Bornstein","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3476(67)80066-0","article-title":"A\u00a0practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age","volume":"71","author":"Battaglia","year":"1967","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib6","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction using fetal biometry combined with maternal biomarkers","author":"Gaccioli","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022","article-title":"Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: an internally validated prediction model","volume":"218","author":"Kalafat","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib8","article-title":"What birthweight percentile is associated with optimal perinatal mortality and childhood education outcomes?","author":"McEwen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.043","article-title":"Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies","volume":"215","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib10","first-page":"565","article-title":"Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth","volume":"30","author":"Costantine","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.931","article-title":"INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity","volume":"214","author":"Anderson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib12","first-page":"187","article-title":"Prenatal detection of fetal growth restriction in newborns classified as small for gestational age: correlates and risk of neonatal morbidity","volume":"31","author":"Chauhan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.152.2.6739822","article-title":"Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters","volume":"152","author":"Hadlock","year":"1984","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2013a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2009.175067","article-title":"Conceptual issues related to the construction of prescriptive standards for the evaluation of postnatal growth of preterm infants","volume":"95","author":"Villar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Dis Childhood"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project","volume":"384","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91342-6","article-title":"Customized antenatal growth charts","volume":"339","author":"Gardosi","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.06030168.x","article-title":"An adjustable fetal weight standard","volume":"6","author":"Gardosi","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.035","article-title":"A\u00a0customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002220","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002220","article-title":"The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight","volume":"14","author":"Kiserud","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD fetal growth studies","volume":"213","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1196\/annals.1365.028","article-title":"The fetus that is small for gestational age","volume":"1092","author":"Vrachnis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ann N Y Acad Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.12.015","article-title":"Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population","volume":"136","author":"Figueras","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.09.007","article-title":"The customized fetal growth potential: a standard for Ireland","volume":"166","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2003.10.011","article-title":"Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control","volume":"28","author":"Deter","year":"2004","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.833904","article-title":"Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories","volume":"27","author":"Deter","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829ca9a7","article-title":"The role of growth trajectories in classifying fetal growth restriction","volume":"122","author":"Barker","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2038","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00148-8","article-title":"Should serial fetal biometry be used in all pregnancies?","volume":"386","author":"Romero","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00656.x","article-title":"Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity","volume":"112","author":"McCowan","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600569133","article-title":"Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight","volume":"85","author":"Johnsen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.506566","article-title":"Association between pregnancy complications and small-for-gestational-age birth weight defined by customized fetal growth standard versus a population-based standard","volume":"24","author":"Odibo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2011-0306","article-title":"Can a customized standard for large for gestational age identify women at risk of operative delivery and shoulder dystocia?","volume":"40","author":"Cha","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.014","article-title":"Customized estimated fetal weight: a novel antenatal tool to diagnose abnormal fetal growth","volume":"207","author":"Kase","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib36","article-title":"The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome","author":"Sovio","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.06.018","article-title":"Fractional fetal thigh volume in the prediction of normal and abnormal fetal growth during the third trimester of pregnancy","volume":"217","author":"Simcox","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12031","article-title":"Statistical considerations for the development of prescriptive fetal and newborn growth standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st project","volume":"120","author":"Altman","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12127","article-title":"Anthropometric standardization and quality control protocols for the construction of new, international, fetal and newborn growth standards: the INTERGROWTH-21st project","volume":"120","author":"Cheikh Ismail","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12047","article-title":"The\u00a0objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st project","volume":"120","author":"Villar","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-157","article-title":"WHO multicenter study for the development of growth standards from fetal life to childhood: the fetal component","volume":"14","author":"Merialdi","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13078.x","article-title":"Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length","volume":"101","author":"Chitty","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13077.x","article-title":"Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements","volume":"101","author":"Chitty","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13007.x","article-title":"Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements","volume":"101","author":"Chitty","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1993.03060378.x","article-title":"Design and analysis of studies to derive charts of fetal size","volume":"3","author":"Altman","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8831","article-title":"Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan","volume":"37","author":"Salomon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib47","first-page":"1083","article-title":"AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations","volume":"32","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmva.2004.05.006","article-title":"Quantile regression for longitudinal data","volume":"91","author":"Koenker","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Multivar Anal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib49","series-title":"Quantile regression","author":"Koenker","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2013.836975","article-title":"Model selection via Bayesian information criterion for quantile regression models","volume":"109","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Stat Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","article-title":"The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data","volume":"33","author":"Landis","year":"1977","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.718389","article-title":"Stillbirth and fetal growth restriction","volume":"26","author":"Serena","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13333","article-title":"Identification of pathologically small fetuses using customized, ultrasound and population-based growth norms","volume":"44","author":"Smith","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2519","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1092956","article-title":"Comparison of customized and cohort-based birthweight standards in identification of growth-restricted infants in GUSTO cohort study","volume":"29","author":"Agarwal","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1027189","article-title":"Association between small for gestational age and intrauterine fetal death: comparing a customized South Korean growth standard versus a population-based fetal growth chart","volume":"29","author":"Moon","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib56","first-page":"830","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in SGA births\u00a0defined by customized versus population-based birthweight standards","volume":"108","author":"Clausson","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00001.x","article-title":"Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction","volume":"15","author":"De Jong","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2008.100","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at term in small-for-gestational age fetuses: comparison of growth velocity vs customized assessment","volume":"36","author":"Iraola","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823dc56e","article-title":"Risk of morbid perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies: customized compared with conventional standards of fetal growth","volume":"119","author":"Larkin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1581","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.32.9.1581","article-title":"Improving antenatal prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates by using customized versus population-based reference standards","volume":"32","author":"Landres","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib61","first-page":"335","article-title":"Population versus customized fetal growth norms and adverse outcomes in an intrapartum cohort","volume":"30","author":"Costantine","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1159\/000361055","article-title":"Assessment of fetal growth by customized growth charts","volume":"65","author":"Gaillard","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Nutr Metab"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.09.006","article-title":"Customized large-for-gestational-age birthweight at term and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"210","author":"Sjaarda","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30663-0","article-title":"Should we use customized fetal growth percentiles in urban Canada?","volume":"36","author":"Melamed","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib65","first-page":"CD008549","article-title":"Customized versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women","volume":"5","author":"Carberry","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib66","first-page":"621","article-title":"Customized versus population fetal growth norms and adverse outcomes associated with small for gestational age infants in a high-risk cohort","volume":"32","author":"Moussa","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib67","first-page":"1888","article-title":"Improving customized fetal biometry by longitudinal modeling","volume":"29","author":"White","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.03003","article-title":"Customized fetal growth charts for parents' characteristics, race, and parity by quantile regression analysis: a cross-sectional multicenter Italian study","volume":"35","author":"Ghi","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002228","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002228","article-title":"Customized and noncustomized birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland","volume":"14","author":"Iliodromiti","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002229","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002229","article-title":"Defining abnormal fetal growth and perinatal risk: population or customized standards?","volume":"14","author":"Stock","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17381","article-title":"Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies","volume":"50","author":"Chiossi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199801153380302","article-title":"Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"338","author":"Cnattingius","year":"1998","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0164161","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0164161","article-title":"Single and serial fetal biometry to detect preterm and term small- and large-for-gestational-age neonates: a longitudinal cohort study","volume":"11","author":"Tarca","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115865","article-title":"Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm","volume":"185","author":"Bukowski","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1228","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.852171","article-title":"Association of third-trimester abdominal circumference with provider-initiated preterm delivery","volume":"27","author":"Hawkins","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(86)90591-0","article-title":"Prepregnancy weight, weight gain, and birth weight","volume":"154","author":"Abrams","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00142-E","article-title":"Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population","volume":"86","author":"Zhang","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02143.x","article-title":"Maternal anthropometrics are associated with fetal size in different periods of pregnancy and at birth. The Generation R study","volume":"116","author":"Ay","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2003.12.002","article-title":"Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application","volume":"28","author":"Gardosi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781732803X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781732803X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:18:45Z","timestamp":1757589525000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293781732803X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"references-count":79,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293781732803X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB\/NICHD Detroit study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.229","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}