{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,26]],"date-time":"2026-10-26T22:31:14Z","timestamp":1793053874937,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,1]],"date-time":"2018-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519862400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,1]],"date-time":"2018-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519862400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,2]],"date-time":"2018-01-02T03:10:13Z","timestamp":1514862613000},"page":"339.e1-339.e7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":62,"title":["Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"218","author":[{"given":"Michal","family":"Lipschuetz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah M.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ariel","family":"Israel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joel","family":"Baron","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shay","family":"Porat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dan V.","family":"Valsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oren","family":"Yagel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hagai","family":"Amsalem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Doron","family":"Kabiri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yinon","family":"Gilboa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eyal","family":"Sivan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ron","family":"Unger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eyal","family":"Schiff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reli","family":"Hershkovitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1412-5862","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simcha","family":"Yagel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.012","article-title":"National trends in primary cesarean delivery, labor attempts, and labor success, 1990-2010","volume":"209","author":"Simon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.002","article-title":"Morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in the United States: is placenta accreta an increasingly important contributor?","volume":"213","author":"Creanga","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.007","article-title":"Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review","volume":"207","author":"Timor-Tritsch","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.035","article-title":"Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review","volume":"205","author":"Marshall","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.007","article-title":"New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns","volume":"217","author":"Rosenbloom","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.031","article-title":"Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety","volume":"199","author":"Clark","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"770.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.007","article-title":"Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"215","author":"Srinivas","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"492.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.05.005","article-title":"The effect of the MFM obesity protocol on cesarean delivery rates","volume":"215","author":"Schuster","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.08.052","article-title":"Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes","volume":"200","author":"Nicholson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.037","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women","volume":"216","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13268","article-title":"Fetal macrosomia: a problem in need of a policy","volume":"43","author":"Campbell","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00702.x","article-title":"Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review","volume":"112","author":"Coomarasamy","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.12.043","article-title":"Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest?","volume":"200","author":"Blackwell","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2002.00010.x","article-title":"Birth, obstetrics and human evolution","volume":"109","author":"Rosenberg","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20140067","DOI":"10.1098\/rstb.2014.0067","article-title":"Between Scylla and Charybdis: renegotiating resolution of the \u2018obstetric dilemma\u2019 in response to ecological change","volume":"370","author":"Wells","year":"2015","journal-title":"Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/ajpa.22160","article-title":"The obstetric dilemma: an ancient game of Russian roulette, or a variable dilemma sensitive to ecology?","volume":"149","author":"Wells","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Phys Anthropol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ogx.0000286584.04310.5c","article-title":"The evolutionary origins of obstructed labor: bipedalism, encephalization, and the human obstetric dilemma","volume":"62","author":"Wittman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14680","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1612410113","article-title":"Cliff-edge model of obstetric selection in humans","volume":"113","author":"Mitteroecker","year":"2016","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11669","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1712203114","article-title":"Cliff-edge model predicts intergenerational predisposition to dystocia and cesarean delivery","volume":"114","author":"Mitteroecker","year":"2017","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.045","article-title":"A\u00a0large head circumference is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and neonatal complications than high birthweight","volume":"213","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.03.028","article-title":"Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women","volume":"201","author":"Valsky","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.04032","article-title":"Third- or fourth-degree intrapartum anal sphincter tears are associated with levator ani avulsion in primiparas","volume":"35","author":"Valsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12520","article-title":"Is neonatal head circumference related to cesarean section for failure to progress?","volume":"56","author":"de Vries","year":"2016","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2182","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.980810","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of fetal head circumference at the onset of labor as a predictor of operative delivery","volume":"28","author":"Ooi","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7760","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of fetal head circumference: how accurate are we?","volume":"37","author":"Melamed","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8831","article-title":"Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan","volume":"37","author":"Salomon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib28","series-title":"Operative vaginal delivery. Practice bulletin no. 17. In: Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician and gynecologists","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)91615-9","article-title":"Macrosomia in postdates pregnancies: the accuracy of routine ultrasonographic screening","volume":"167","author":"Pollack","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib30","first-page":"317","article-title":"Clinical vs sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial","volume":"45","author":"Hendrix","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6378","article-title":"Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term","volume":"34","author":"Kayem","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.043","article-title":"Association between sonographic measurement of fetal head circumference and labor outcome","volume":"132","author":"Aviram","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-106","article-title":"Fetal head circumference, operative delivery, and fetal outcomes: a multi-ethnic population-based cohort study","volume":"13","author":"Mujugira","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01358.x","article-title":"The influence of fetal head circumference on labor outcome: a population-based register study","volume":"91","author":"Elvander","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1080\/0144361031000153701","article-title":"Postpartum fetal head circumference and its influence on labor duration in nullipara","volume":"23","author":"Kennelly","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1159\/000010239","article-title":"Prolonged labor attributed to large fetus","volume":"49","author":"Hogberg","year":"2000","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14837","article-title":"Association of fetal biparietal diameter with mode of delivery and perinatal outcome","volume":"47","author":"Bardin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burke N, Burke G, Breathnach F, et\u00a0al. A fetal head circumference above the 90th centile is a significant risk factor for cesarean delivery and complicated labor: results from the prospective multi-center Genesis study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;214:S197.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.390"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.017","article-title":"Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study","volume":"216","author":"Burke","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00154-4","article-title":"Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies","volume":"111","author":"Jolly","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817328041?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937817328041?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:17:25Z","timestamp":1757589445000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937817328041"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937817328041"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}