{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T15:47:11Z","timestamp":1772812031028,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,1]],"date-time":"2018-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1527811200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,1]],"date-time":"2018-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1527811200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,26]],"date-time":"2018-03-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1522022400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,23]],"date-time":"2018-03-23T18:05:29Z","timestamp":1521828329000},"page":"620.e1-620.e7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"218","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8074-395X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Susanna","family":"Timonen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kaisa","family":"Holmberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1021","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91320-3","article-title":"Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth","volume":"173","author":"Vintzileos","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.04.024","article-title":"Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States","volume":"204","author":"Chen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318289510d","article-title":"Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States: temporal trends and adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"121","author":"Ananth","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(94)00320-D","article-title":"Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis","volume":"85","author":"Vintzileos","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.035","article-title":"Defining the limits of electronic fetal heart rate","volume":"216","author":"Schifrin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(89)91848-5","article-title":"Cerebral palsy among children born during the Dublin randomized trial of intrapartum monitoring","volume":"2","author":"Grant","year":"1989","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib7","first-page":"CD006066","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labor","volume":"2","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.10.009","article-title":"The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia","volume":"216","author":"Clark","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.009","article-title":"Web-based comparison of historical vs contemporary methods of fetal heart rate interpretation","volume":"215","author":"Epstein","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181aef106","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 106","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.08.016","article-title":"Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: applying principles of patient safety","volume":"206","author":"Miller","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.053","article-title":"Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy","volume":"197","author":"Larma","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.04.023","article-title":"Electronic fetal monitoring: does it really lead to better outcomes?","volume":"204","author":"Devoe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.48.2.338","article-title":"ST-segment elevation in acute myocardial infarction. Prognostic importance","volume":"48","author":"Nielsen","year":"1973","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-1716.1975.tb05790.x","article-title":"Changes in the fetal heart rate and ECG during hypoxia","volume":"93","author":"Rosen","year":"1975","journal-title":"Acta Physiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90197-2","article-title":"The relationship between circulating catecholamines and ST waveform in the fetal lamb electrocardiogram during hypoxia","volume":"149","author":"Rosen","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.111932","article-title":"ST waveform changes during repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep","volume":"184","author":"Westgate","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.008","article-title":"Fetal ECG waveform analysis","volume":"18","author":"Rosen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1007\/s11296-005-0017-2","article-title":"Foetal ECG and STAN technology\u2013a review","volume":"1","author":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib20","first-page":"1151","article-title":"Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases","volume":"169","author":"Westgate","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8","article-title":"Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomized controlled trial","volume":"358","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography\u2013a randomized controlled study","volume":"113","author":"Ojala","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib23","first-page":"299.e1","article-title":"A\u00a0French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor","volume":"197","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182083dcd","article-title":"Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1500600","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis","volume":"373","author":"Belfort","year":"2015","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01203.x","article-title":"Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-to-treat principle","volume":"90","author":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d8230","article-title":"ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis","volume":"119","author":"Becker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.01.028","article-title":"Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis","volume":"208","author":"Schuit","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12412","article-title":"A\u00a0critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses","volume":"93","author":"Olofsson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1314886","article-title":"ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"29","author":"Potti","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib31","first-page":"CD000116","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labor","volume":"12","author":"Neilson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001198","article-title":"Electrocardiogram ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"127","author":"Saccone","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12923","article-title":"Is STAN monitoring associated with a significant decrease in metabolic acidosis at birth compared with cardiotocography alone? Review of the three meta-analyses that included the recent US trial","volume":"95","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12828","article-title":"ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"95","author":"Blix","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib35","unstructured":"Food and Drug Administration. Summary of safety and effectiveness data: HeartWare ventricular assist device. Section X. Summary of primary clinical study. Available at: http:\/\/www.accessdata.fda.gov\/cdrh_docs\/pdf10\/P100047b.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1007\/s11886-014-0489-0","article-title":"Approval of high-risk medical devices in the US: Implications for clinical cardiology","volume":"16","author":"Rome","year":"2014","journal-title":"Curr Cardiol Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib37","unstructured":"Food and Drug Administration. PDUFA reauthorization performance goals and procedures fiscal years 2018 through 2022. Available at: http:\/\/www.fda.gov\/downloads\/forindustry\/UserFees\/PrescriptionDrugUserFee\/UCM511438.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib38","unstructured":"Food and Drug Administration. FDA\u2013industry MDUFAIV reauthorization meeting. Aug. 15, 2016. Available at: http:\/\/www.fda.gov\/downloads\/ForIndustry\/UserFees\/MedicalDeviceUserFee\/UCM518203.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2293","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb1609216","article-title":"Real-world evidence\u2013what is it and what can it tell us?","volume":"375","author":"Sherman","year":"2016","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1226794","article-title":"Does ST analysis of fetal ECG reduce cesarean section rate for fetal distress?","volume":"30","author":"Straface","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib41","first-page":"3260","article-title":"ST-analysis in electronic fetal monitoring is cost-effective from both the maternal and neonatal perspective","volume":"29","author":"van 't Hooft","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib42","first-page":"307","article-title":"Fetal monitoring during labor: practice versus theory in a region-wide analysis","volume":"39","author":"Jacquemyn","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01528.x","article-title":"Intrapartum monitoring of high-risk deliveries with ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram: an observational study of 6010 deliveries","volume":"92","author":"Kessler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042","article-title":"Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study","volume":"156","author":"Doret","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.121","article-title":"Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG. A multi-center, observational study","volume":"32","author":"Luttkus","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib46","first-page":"428","article-title":"Impact of fetal ECG (STAN) and competency based training on intrapartum intervention and perinatal outcomes at a teaching hospital in London: 5 year analysis","volume":"120","author":"Chandraharan","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib47","first-page":"546.e1","article-title":"Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital","volume":"202","author":"Nor\u00e9n","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2011.046","article-title":"Intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) and ST-analysis of labor in diabetic patients","volume":"39","author":"Yli","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1900","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3947","article-title":"A\u00a0method for monitoring a process from an out of control to an in control state: application to the learning curve","volume":"29","author":"Biau","year":"2010","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4969","article-title":"How many procedures does it take? Success of a CVS training program for maternal fetal medicine fellows","volume":"36","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.16.01074","article-title":"Longitudinal assessment of examiner experience and the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation at term","volume":"36","author":"Faschingbauer","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2007.097","article-title":"Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor\u2013a multi-center, case controlled study","volume":"35","author":"Noren","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib53","first-page":"159","article-title":"Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring","volume":"25","author":"Roth","year":"1987","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance","volume":"114","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.3109\/00365517109080214","article-title":"An acid base chart for arterial blood with normal and pathophysiological reference areas","volume":"27","author":"Siggaard-Andersen","year":"1971","journal-title":"Scand J Clin Lab Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01431.x","article-title":"Identification of cases with adverse neonatal outcome monitored by cardiotocography versus ST analysis: secondary analysis of a randomized trial","volume":"91","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.02.007","article-title":"How deviations from STAN guidelines contribute to operative delivery for suspected fetal distress","volume":"162","author":"Massoud","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.09.013","article-title":"Interpretation of epidemiologic studies very often lacked adequate consideration of confounding","volume":"93","author":"Hemkens","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017_bib59","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Welfare. Perinatal statistics\u2013parturients, deliveries and newborns. Statistical report. Available at: https:\/\/thl.fi\/fi\/web\/thlfi-en\/statistics\/statistics-by-topic\/sexual-and-reproductive-health\/parturients-deliveries-and-births\/perinatal-statistics-parturients-delivers-and-newborns. Accessed April 12, 2018."}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818302230?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818302230?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:17:42Z","timestamp":1757589462000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937818302230"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937818302230"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}