{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T16:20:39Z","timestamp":1790439639734,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,1]],"date-time":"2018-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1530403200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,1]],"date-time":"2018-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1530403200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100009633","name":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100009633","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,12]],"date-time":"2018-04-12T13:38:15Z","timestamp":1523540295000},"page":"105.e1-105.e11","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":107,"title":["Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"219","author":[{"given":"Mark P.","family":"Hehir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0410-2595","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cande V.","family":"Ananth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zainab","family":"Siddiq","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen","family":"Flood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6111-6574","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexander M.","family":"Friedman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1457-6284","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mary E.","family":"D\u2019Alton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib1","first-page":"436","article-title":"Appropriate technology for birth","volume":"2","year":"1985","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib2","series-title":"The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary cesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World health report. Background paper 30","author":"Gibbons","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1819","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68704-7","article-title":"Cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America","volume":"367","author":"Villar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61870-5","article-title":"Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes\u00a0in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08","volume":"375","author":"Lumbiganon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.15553","article-title":"Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality","volume":"314","author":"Molina","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2238","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.15948","article-title":"Cesarean delivery rates: revisiting a 3-decades-old dogma","volume":"314","author":"D\u2019Alton","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539501000122","article-title":"Classification of cesarean sections","volume":"12","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70394-0","article-title":"Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates","volume":"174","author":"Robson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021","article-title":"Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor","volume":"201","author":"Brennan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0148138","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148138","article-title":"Cesarean section in Peru: analysis of trends using the Robson classification system","volume":"11","author":"Tapia","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.11.026","article-title":"The Robson Ten-Group Classification System for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil","volume":"129","author":"Ferreira","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e260","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(15)70094-X","article-title":"Use of the Robson classification to assess cesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys","volume":"3","author":"Vogel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e14566","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0014566","article-title":"Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Torloni","year":"2011","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.012","article-title":"Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem","volume":"36","author":"Boyle","year":"2012","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib15","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2013","volume":"64","author":"Martin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182704880","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists workshop","volume":"120","author":"Spong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib18","first-page":"1","article-title":"Expanded data from the new birth certificate, 2008","volume":"59","author":"Osterman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib19","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital Statistics Data. Birth data users guide 2015. Available at: www.cdc.gov\/nchs. Accessed August 18, 2017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.02.026","article-title":"Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey","volume":"197","author":"Reichman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib21","first-page":"335","article-title":"Validation of birth certificate data in New York State","volume":"28","author":"Roohan","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Commun Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib22","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assessing\u00a0the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: results from two states","volume":"62","author":"Martin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib23","first-page":"CD004660","article-title":"Cesarean section for non-medical reasons at term","volume":"3","author":"Lavender","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib24","series-title":"National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Cesarean section","first-page":"1","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000428647.67925.d3","article-title":"Cesarean delivery on maternal request. ACOG committee opinion no. 559","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829bd0a0","article-title":"Diminishing availability of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in New Mexico hospitals","volume":"122","author":"Leeman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.004","article-title":"Nonclinical factors affecting women\u2019s access to trial of labor after cesarean delivery","volume":"38","author":"Korst","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.12.001","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting","volume":"216","author":"Tilden","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5","article-title":"National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights","volume":"115","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781830293X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781830293X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:20:16Z","timestamp":1757589616000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293781830293X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293781830293X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.05.026","name":"associatedlink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to the associated document"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}