{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T15:50:24Z","timestamp":1791993024603,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":70,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,28]],"date-time":"2018-08-28T09:28:16Z","timestamp":1535448496000},"page":"106.e1-106.e10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8043-556X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kartik K.","family":"Venkatesh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Leslie H.","family":"Clark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David M.","family":"Stamilio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.03.029","article-title":"Tubal sterilization trends in the United States","volume":"94","author":"Chan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2015","volume":"66","author":"Martin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002243","article-title":"The evolution of and evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy","volume":"130","author":"Dilley","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.031","article-title":"National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998-2011","volume":"213","author":"Mikhail","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001531","article-title":"Experience with opportunistic salpingectomy in a large, community-based health system in the United States","volume":"128","author":"Garcia","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002312","article-title":"Salpingectomy for sterilization: change in practice in a large integrated health care system, 2011-2016","volume":"130","author":"Powell","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.05.006","article-title":"Postpartum permanent sterilization: could bilateral salpingectomy replace bilateral tubal ligation?","volume":"23","author":"Danis","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4340-x","article-title":"Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery","volume":"295","author":"Shinar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib9","series-title":"A\u00a0prospective feasibility study of postpartum distal salpingectomy","author":"Hsieh","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1080\/07357907.2016.1242597","article-title":"Physicians' perspectives and practice patterns toward opportunistic salpingectomy in high- and low-risk women","volume":"35","author":"Jones","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cancer Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib11","first-page":"13","article-title":"Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis","volume":"5","author":"Rice","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ovarian Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2017.05.034","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention","volume":"146","author":"Dilley","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/dju410","article-title":"Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study","volume":"107","author":"Falconer","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmq030","article-title":"Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"Cibula","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.003","article-title":"Ovarian cancer research program of British Columbia. Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention","volume":"210","author":"McAlpine","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.10.035","article-title":"The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States","volume":"216","author":"Hanley","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000630","article-title":"Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy","volume":"125","author":"Kwon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002646","article-title":"Feasibility of complete salpingectomy compared with standard postpartum tubal ligation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"132","author":"Subramaniam","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S380","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.167","article-title":"The cost-effectiveness of salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery (abstract)","volume":"1","author":"Subramanian A","year":"2018","journal-title":"Amer J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002674","article-title":"Salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"132","author":"Garcia","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13741","article-title":"Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS) for the prevention of ovarian cancer should be offered in the context of a clinical trial: FOR: there is lack of clarity on a number of key issues","volume":"123","author":"Manchanda","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib22","article-title":"Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis","author":"Edejer","year":"2003"},{"issue":"60","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib23","first-page":"1","article-title":"Division of Vital Statistics. Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006-2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995","author":"Jones","year":"2012","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Report"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00481-7","article-title":"Tubal sterilization: focus on the US experience","volume":"73","author":"Westhoff","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000503","article-title":"Risks and benefits of salpingectomy at the time of sterilization","volume":"72","author":"Castellano","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X05282640","article-title":"Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: implications for societal health care resource allocation","volume":"25","author":"King","year":"2005","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000981","article-title":"Characteristics of long-term survivors of epithelial ovarian cancer","volume":"126","author":"Cress","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318264f794","article-title":"Ten-year relative survival for epithelial ovarian cancer","volume":"120","author":"Baldwin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib29","unstructured":"National Center for Health Statistics. Life expectancy. Available at: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/fastats\/life-expectancy.htm. Accessed Jan. 3,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib30","unstructured":"National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2013, based on November 2015 SEER data submission. Available at: https:\/\/seer.cancer.gov\/csr\/1975_2013\/. Accessed Nov. 6,\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2402","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7112","article-title":"Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers","volume":"317","author":"Kuchenbaecker","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2304","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2011.743","article-title":"Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome","volume":"305","author":"Bonadona","year":"2011","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2014.10.005","article-title":"Effect of tubal sterilization technique on risk of serous epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma","volume":"135","author":"Lessard-Anderson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2010.10.002","article-title":"Contraception methods, beyond oral contraceptives and tubal ligation, and risk of ovarian cancer","volume":"21","author":"Ness","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1080\/0284186X.2016.1175660","article-title":"Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use on the cancer risk of the ovary and fallopian tube","volume":"55","author":"Soini","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwm157","article-title":"Association of oral contraceptive use, other contraceptive methods, and infertility with ovarian cancer risk","volume":"166","author":"Tworoger","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000124568.71597.ce","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery","volume":"103","author":"Burrows","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000215988.23224.e4","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term","volume":"108","author":"Allen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib39","first-page":"477","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term","volume":"102","author":"Allen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.035","article-title":"Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review","volume":"205","author":"Marshall","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.070","article-title":"Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery","volume":"217","author":"Temming","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.02.021","article-title":"Technique for bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery: a case series","volume":"95","author":"Duncan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1089\/sur.2017.089","article-title":"Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review","volume":"18","author":"Cheng","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Infect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.034","article-title":"General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay","volume":"210","author":"Procter","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.04.003","article-title":"Predictors of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a multicenter analysis using the national surgical quality improvement program data","volume":"21","author":"Mahdi","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2010.06.009","article-title":"Factors influencing cesarean delivery operative times: a prospective observational cohort study","volume":"19","author":"Wilson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.028","article-title":"Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial","volume":"217","author":"Ganer Herman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.01.007","article-title":"Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European active surveillance study on intrauterine devices","volume":"91","author":"Heinemann","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70658-0","article-title":"The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the US collaborative review of sterilization","volume":"174","author":"Peterson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.07.021","article-title":"Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system","volume":"190","author":"Backman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.3109\/13625180903427675","article-title":"Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature","volume":"15","author":"Mansour","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1998","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1110855","article-title":"Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"366","author":"Winner","year":"2012","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199703133361104","article-title":"The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. US collaborative review of sterilization working group","volume":"336","author":"Peterson","year":"1997","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib54","unstructured":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Available at: https:\/\/www.ahrq.gov\/research\/data\/hcup\/index.html. Accessed Nov. 12,\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib55","unstructured":"Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Physician fee schedule look-up tool. Available at: https:\/\/www.cms.gov\/apps\/physician-fee-schedule\/license-agreement.aspx. Accessed Nov. 12,\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djn103","article-title":"Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States","volume":"100","author":"Yabroff","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.276","article-title":"Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector national surgical quality improvement program","volume":"199","author":"Dimick","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"934","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2011.04.006","article-title":"Hospital costs associated with surgical site infections in general and vascular surgery patients","volume":"150","author":"Boltz","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1960","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-6773.2007.00702.x","article-title":"Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a cost analysis of family planning services in California","volume":"42","author":"Amaral","year":"2007","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.04.120","article-title":"Measuring the effects of unintended pregnancy on women's quality of life","volume":"78","author":"Schwarz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.08.003","article-title":"Measuring health utility in varying pregnancy contexts among a diverse cohort of pregnant women","volume":"96","author":"Lundsberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-200006000-00004","article-title":"One thousand health-related quality-of- life outcomes","volume":"38","author":"Teng","year":"2000","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib63","unstructured":"US Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI inflation calculator. Available at: http:\/\/www.bls.gov\/data\/inflation_calculator.htm. Accessed Nov. 10,\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.12.026","article-title":"Determination of quality of life-related utilities for health states relevant to ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment","volume":"113","author":"Havrilesky","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.06.007","article-title":"Risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy: a decision analysis","volume":"217","author":"Cadish","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000144","article-title":"Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices","volume":"123","author":"Aoun","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(08)60167-1","article-title":"Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls","volume":"371","author":"Beral","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)01558-2","article-title":"Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the US collaborative review of sterilization","volume":"74","author":"Schmidt","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.033","article-title":"The cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor accrues with multiple subsequent vaginal deliveries","volume":"211","author":"Wymer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032_bib70","unstructured":"Wolters Kluwer Health. Medi-Span master drug database. Available at: http:\/\/www.medi-span.com\/drug-pricing-analysis-pricerx.aspx. Accessed Nov. 17,\u00a02017."}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818307117?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818307117?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:21:05Z","timestamp":1757589665000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937818307117"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"references-count":70,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937818307117"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.032","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}