{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T05:27:40Z","timestamp":1783488460621,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,29]],"date-time":"2018-09-29T11:10:03Z","timestamp":1538219403000},"page":"98.e1-98.e14","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"given":"Xiao","family":"Xu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8383-1720","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Henry C.","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Haiqun","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisbet S.","family":"Lundsberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3013-7169","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katherine H.","family":"Campbell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Heather S.","family":"Lipkind","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christian M.","family":"Pettker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica L.","family":"Illuzzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib1","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 67, no 1. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2018. Available at: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/data\/nvsr\/nvsr67\/nvsr67_01.pdf. Accessed April 30,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.05.019","article-title":"Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options","volume":"24","author":"Maheux-Lacroix","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1112","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e0d1b6","article-title":"Solving the vaginal birth after cesarean dilemma","volume":"115","author":"Scott","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2005.019","article-title":"Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody?","volume":"33","author":"Ben-Meir","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.006","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean trends: which way is the pendulum swinging?","volume":"44","author":"Sargent","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib6","first-page":"e217","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Practice bulletin no. 184","volume":"130","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1668","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.879115","article-title":"Litigation in obstetrics: does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery?","volume":"27","author":"Cheng","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31818475de","article-title":"Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"47","author":"Yang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-83","article-title":"A\u00a0survey of access to trial of labor in California hospitals in 2012","volume":"13","author":"Barger","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-012-1132-6","article-title":"Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990\u20132009","volume":"17","author":"Uddin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib11","unstructured":"Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). State of California. Types of OSHPD Patient-Level Data. Available at: https:\/\/www.oshpd.ca.gov\/HID\/Data_Request_Center\/Types_of_Data.html. Accessed May 1,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12149","article-title":"Statistical benchmarks for health care provider performance assessment: a comparison of standard approaches to a hierarchical Bayesian histogram-based method","volume":"49","author":"Paddock","year":"2014","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.058","article-title":"Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data","volume":"194","author":"Yasmeen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31826d60c5","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States","volume":"120","author":"Callaghan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet and Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib15","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe maternal morbidity in the United States. Atlanta, GA. Available at: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/reproductivehealth\/MaternalInfantHealth\/SevereMaternalMorbidity.html. Accessed May 15,\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib16","unstructured":"California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Unexpected complications in term newborns. Available at: https:\/\/www.cmqcc.org\/focus-areas\/quality-metrics\/unexpected-complications-term-newborns. Accessed March 16,\u00a02016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.10762","article-title":"Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery","volume":"37","author":"Gregory","year":"2002","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib18","unstructured":"Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Comorbidity software. Version 3.6. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http:\/\/www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov\/toolssoftware\/comorbidity\/comorbidity.jsp. Accessed Jan. 20,\u00a02014."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822a65e4","article-title":"Hospital volume, provider volume, and complications after childbirth in US hospitals","volume":"118","author":"Janakiraman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318190bb33","article-title":"Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data","volume":"113","author":"Kahn","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1414","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.84.9.1414","article-title":"An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index","volume":"84","author":"Kotelchuck","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-007-0256-6","article-title":"An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity","volume":"12","author":"Kuklina","year":"2008","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32511-7","article-title":"Risk of fetal death associated with maternal drug dependence and placental abruption: a population-based study","volume":"29","author":"McDonald","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1089\/aid.2012.0242","article-title":"HIV infection and its impact on fetal outcomes among women of advanced maternal age: a propensity score weighted matching approach","volume":"29","author":"Salihu","year":"2013","journal-title":"AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d9f4b6","article-title":"Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality","volume":"115","author":"Srinivas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15007","article-title":"Hospital variation in cost of childbirth and contributing factors: a cross-sectional study","volume":"125","author":"Xu","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib27","unstructured":"American Hospital Association. AHA Annual Survey Database. Available at: https:\/\/www.ahadataviewer.com\/additional-data-products\/AHA-Survey\/. Accessed May 1,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib28","unstructured":"Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). State of California. Hospital Annual Financial Data. Available at: https:\/\/www.oshpd.ca.gov\/HID\/Hospital-Financial.html. Accessed Oct. 20,\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib29","unstructured":"California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative. Available at: https:\/\/www.cpqcc.org\/. Accessed May 1,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib30","unstructured":"Medical Liability Monitor. Annual rate survey issue. October 2011. Vol 36, no. 10. Available at: https:\/\/www.medicalliabilitymonitor.com\/rate-survey.php."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib31","unstructured":"Ash A, Fienberg S, Louis T, Normand S, Stukel T, Utts J. Statistical issues in assessing hospital performance. 2012. Available at: https:\/\/www.cms.gov\/Medicare\/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments\/HospitalQualityInits\/Downloads\/Statistical-Issues-in-Assessing-Hospital-Performance.pdf. Accessed June 29,\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1531","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.13381","article-title":"Association between hospital-level obstetric quality indicators and maternal and neonatal morbidity","volume":"312","author":"Howell","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib33","series-title":"Methods of clinical epidemiology","first-page":"39","article-title":"Chapter 4. The coefficient of variation as an index of measurement reliability","author":"Shechtman","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwi188","article-title":"Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences","volume":"162","author":"Spiegelman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.553695","article-title":"The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality","volume":"24","author":"Solheim","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib36","first-page":"CD004667","article-title":"Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women","volume":"4","author":"Sandall","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1097\/JHQ.0000000000000102","article-title":"Healthcare affiliation networks: a unique quality\u00a0partnership to aid in making communities healthier","volume":"39","author":"Frush","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Healthc Qual"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12631","article-title":"Impact of health system affiliation on hospital resource use intensity and quality of care","volume":"53","author":"Henke","year":"2018","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib39","unstructured":"Zolutusky L. Analysis of the primary cesarean delivery rate: a legal and policy approach. Hastings Womens Law J 2013;24. Available at: https:\/\/repository.uchastings.edu\/hwlj\/vol24\/iss2\/6\/. Accessed June 14,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib40","unstructured":"Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM, Uddin SFG. Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: new data from the birth certificate, 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 64, no 4. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. Available at: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/data\/nvsr\/nvsr64\/nvsr64_04.pdf. Accessed May 4,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib41","unstructured":"Guise J-M, Eden K, Emeis C, et\u00a0al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence Report\/Technology Assessment No. 191. (prepared by the Oregon Health and Science University Evidence-Based Practice Center under contract no. 290-2007-10057-I). AHRQ publication no. 10-E003. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; March 2010. Available at: https:\/\/www.ahrq.gov\/downloads\/pub\/evidence\/pdf\/vbacup\/vbacup.pdf. Accessed May 4,\u00a02018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.12724","article-title":"Limitations of vaginal birth after cesarean success prediction","volume":"63","author":"Thornton","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.02.096","article-title":"The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data","volume":"193","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818308263?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818308263?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:23:11Z","timestamp":1757589791000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937818308263"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937818308263"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.034","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}