{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T22:49:32Z","timestamp":1789685372370,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,1]],"date-time":"2018-11-01T20:07:52Z","timestamp":1541102872000},"page":"193.e1-193.e12","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":54,"title":["A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9571-3219","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jos\u00e9 Antonio","family":"Sainz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3079-5583","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jos\u00e9 Antonio","family":"Garc\u00eda-Mejido","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adriana","family":"Aquise","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlota","family":"Borrero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mar\u00eda Jos\u00e9","family":"Bonomi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ana","family":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Palac\u00edn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1325","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70049-2","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor","volume":"175","author":"Bofill","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines","volume":"214","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1247605","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery","volume":"27","author":"Contag","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.027","article-title":"Temporal trends in obstetric trauma and inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: an age-period-cohort analysis","volume":"215","author":"Lisonkova","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.030","article-title":"Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence","volume":"214","author":"Jango","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"610.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.010","article-title":"Recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence","volume":"216","author":"Jango","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.041","article-title":"Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population","volume":"215","author":"Meister","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06341-3","article-title":"Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study","volume":"358","author":"Murphy","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.051","article-title":"Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience","volume":"197","author":"Ben-Haroush","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.935","article-title":"Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures","volume":"214","author":"Armstrong","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.12.001","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting","volume":"216","author":"Tilden","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117309","article-title":"The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes","volume":"185","author":"Gardella","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib14","first-page":"69","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician gynecologists","volume":"74","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib15","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Operative Vaginal Delivery. Green-top guideline no. 26. 2011. Available at: http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/womens-health\/clinical-guidance\/operative-vaginal-delivery-green-top-26. Accessed July 28,\u00a02016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.028","article-title":"Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification","volume":"192","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.029","article-title":"Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor","volume":"191","author":"Chou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.011","article-title":"Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor","volume":"193","author":"Zahalka","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.005","article-title":"Descent of the fetal head (station) during the first stage of labor","volume":"214","author":"Hamilton","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.020","article-title":"The \u201cocciput-spine angle\u201d: A new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor","volume":"215","author":"Ghi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.025","article-title":"The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations","volume":"217","author":"Bellussi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12379","article-title":"Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery","volume":"41","author":"Ghi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6400","article-title":"What is the best transperineal ultrasound parameter for predicting success of vacuum extraction","volume":"33","author":"Lau","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14951","article-title":"Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure","volume":"48","author":"Bultez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2041","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.976547","article-title":"Instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women","volume":"28","author":"Sainz","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib26","first-page":"3400","article-title":"Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position","volume":"29","author":"Sainz","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1348","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1048680","article-title":"Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery","volume":"29","author":"Sainz","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.009","article-title":"Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study","volume":"217","author":"Kahrs","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13230","article-title":"Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound used to predict cases of complicated operative (vacuum and forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women","volume":"96","author":"Sainz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.045","article-title":"A\u00a0large head circumference is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and neonatal complications than high birthweight","volume":"213","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230","article-title":"Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"218","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2182","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.980810","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of fetal head circumference at the onset of labor as a predictor of operative delivery","volume":"28","author":"Ooi","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8831","article-title":"Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal scan","volume":"37","author":"Salomon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib36","first-page":"1","article-title":"Intra- and interobserver variability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurements with contraction and pushing","volume":"38","author":"Sainz","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(93)90514-W","article-title":"Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery","volume":"43","author":"Sultan","year":"1993","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13256","article-title":"Intrapartum ultrasound, a predictive method for complicated operative forceps delivery in non-occiput posterior deliveries","volume":"43","author":"Cuerva","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220141227","article-title":"A\u00a0randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria","volume":"22","author":"Weerasekera","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"908","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00228.x","article-title":"Spontaneous delivery or manual removal of the\u00a0placenta during caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"111","author":"Morales","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6294","article-title":"Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the \u2018angle of progression\u2019 predict the mode of delivery?","volume":"33","author":"Kalache","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12810","article-title":"Instrumental delivery and ultrasound : a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery","volume":"121","author":"Ramphul","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.007","article-title":"Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station","volume":"216","author":"Kasbaoui","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.16120","article-title":"Correlation between the angle of progression and complicated operative vaginal delivery after prolonged second stage of labour","volume":"48","author":"Martins","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.013","article-title":"Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable","volume":"214","author":"Kleinrouweler","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.017","article-title":"Prediction of caesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study","volume":"216","author":"Burke","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.044","article-title":"A\u00a0model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"213","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib48","first-page":"819","article-title":"Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome","volume":"46","author":"Sheiner","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-106","article-title":"Fetal head circumference, operative delivery, and fetal outcomes: a multi-ethnic population-based cohort study","volume":"13","author":"Mujugira","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1995.tb01978.x","article-title":"Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: clinical versus 8 sonographic models","volume":"35","author":"Chauhan","year":"1995","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1390-8","article-title":"A\u00a0new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term","volume":"283","author":"Siggelkow","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.08.104","article-title":"Ultrasound estimated fetal weight","volume":"217","author":"Ross","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818309426?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818309426?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:22:50Z","timestamp":1757589770000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937818309426"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937818309426"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}