{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T05:44:23Z","timestamp":1792129463604,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,9]],"date-time":"2018-11-09T16:05:45Z","timestamp":1541779545000},"page":"183.e1-183.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["Uterine structural abnormality and intrauterine device malposition: analysis of ultrasonographic and demographic variables of 517 patients"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"given":"Sabrina A.","family":"Gerkowicz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Desiree G.","family":"Fiorentino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew P.","family":"Kovacs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristopher L.","family":"Arheart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Usha","family":"Verma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib1","unstructured":"Population Reference Bureau. Family Planning Worldwide, 2013 Data Sheet. 2013. Available at: http:\/\/www.prb.org\/pdf13\/family-planning-2013-datasheet_eng.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib2","unstructured":"United Nations DoEaSA, Population Division. 2015. Trends in contraceptive use worldwide 2015 (ST\/ESA\/SER.A\/349). Available at: http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/development\/desa\/population\/publications\/pdf\/family\/trendsContraceptiveUse2015Report.pdf. Accessed October 28, 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.322115068","article-title":"Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care","volume":"32","author":"Boortz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182316308","article-title":"Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies","volume":"118","author":"Braaten","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10009-1255","article-title":"The role of ultrasound in the assessment of intrauterine device complications","volume":"6","author":"Ansari AS TT","year":"2012","journal-title":"Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib6","first-page":"39","article-title":"Malpositioned IUDs: when you should intervene (and when you should not)","volume":"24","author":"Braaten","year":"2012","journal-title":"OBG Manage"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib7","first-page":"112","article-title":"Intrauterine device failure: relation to its location within the uterine cavity","volume":"81","author":"Anteby","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.02.003","article-title":"Partial and complete expulsion of the Multiload 375 IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion","volume":"137","author":"Merki-Feld","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.5483","article-title":"Does the type of intrauterine device affect conspicuity on 2D and 3D ultrasound?","volume":"196","author":"Moschos","year":"2011","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6421","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are a source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding","volume":"34","author":"Benacerraf","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.02.011","article-title":"Intrauterine device use among women with uterine fibroids: a systematic review","volume":"82","author":"Zapata","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.09.009","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasonography versus two-dimensional ultrasonography for the diagnosis of intrauterine device malposition","volume":"128","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.21955","article-title":"Normal and abnormal images of intrauterine devices: role of three-dimensional sonography","volume":"40","author":"Graupera","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12619","article-title":"Dimensions of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine device expulsion or removal for displacement: a nested case-control study","volume":"121","author":"Liang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib15","first-page":"19","article-title":"Popularity disparity: attitudes about the IUD in Europe and the United States","volume":"10","author":"Sonfield","year":"2007","journal-title":"Guttmacher Policy Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(90)90059-5","article-title":"Do retroverted uteri adversely affect insertions and performance of IUDs?","volume":"41","author":"Chi","year":"1990","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.05.013","article-title":"Five years' experience with a small intracervical\/intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing device","volume":"72","author":"Pakarinen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2013-100684","article-title":"Low-lying or malpositioned intrauterine devices and systems","volume":"40","author":"Golightly","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2917","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135819","article-title":"Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion","volume":"10","author":"Bahamondes","year":"1995","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2323","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg433","article-title":"The value of transvaginal ultrasound to monitor the position of an intrauterine device after insertion. A technology assessment study","volume":"18","author":"de Kroon","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781831144X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293781831144X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:21:29Z","timestamp":1757589689000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293781831144X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293781831144X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Uterine structural abnormality and intrauterine device malposition: analysis of ultrasonographic and demographic variables of 517 patients","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}