{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,9]],"date-time":"2026-07-09T23:27:02Z","timestamp":1783639622194,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":79,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,19]],"date-time":"2018-11-19T11:45:41Z","timestamp":1542627941000},"page":"336-347","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6527-7866","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Doron","family":"Kabiri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Razan","family":"Masarwy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natali","family":"Schachter-Safrai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reem","family":"Masarwa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bruria","family":"Hirsh Raccah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yossef","family":"Ezra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ilan","family":"Matok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980\u20132009","author":"Martin","year":"2012","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2218","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1301467","article-title":"Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States","volume":"369","author":"Kulkarni","year":"2013","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.01.185","article-title":"Seeing double: a nation of twins from sea to shining sea","volume":"214","author":"Adashi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11988.x","article-title":"Comparison of second trimester biometry in singleton and twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive techniques","volume":"104","author":"Gardosi","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.16.3.180.186","article-title":"Monoamniotic twins: an update on antenatal diagnosis and treatment","volume":"16","author":"Shveiky","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1966","article-title":"Growth discrepancy in twins in the first trimester of pregnancy","volume":"26","author":"Salomon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa070641","article-title":"A\u00a0trial of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in twins","volume":"357","author":"Rouse","year":"2007","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.02.064","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib9","first-page":"83","article-title":"Maternal complications in twin pregnancies","volume":"20","author":"Chowdhury","year":"2011","journal-title":"Mymensingh Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12019","article-title":"Progesterone to prevent preterm birth in twin gestations: what is the next step forward?","volume":"120","author":"Romero","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.03.033","article-title":"The risk of stillbirth and infant death by each additional week of expectant management in twin pregnancies","volume":"212","author":"Page","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.003","article-title":"Severe acute maternal morbidity in multiple pregnancies: a nationwide cohort study","volume":"214","author":"Witteveen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15821","article-title":"International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17397","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data","volume":"49","author":"Romero","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.018","article-title":"Toward safe standards for assessment of fetal growth in twin pregnancy","volume":"216","author":"Gardosi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15922","article-title":"Pitfall in first-trimester diagnosis of chorionicity in twin pregnancy","volume":"49","author":"Gueneuc","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.64","article-title":"Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"188","author":"Hogle","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318163c435","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery","volume":"111","author":"Schmitz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2013.12.008","article-title":"Twin delivery: method, timing and conduct","volume":"28","author":"Barrett","year":"2014","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib20","first-page":"Cd006553","article-title":"Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.01.008","article-title":"Delivery of vertex\/nonvertex twins: did the horses already leave the barn?","volume":"214","author":"Blickstein","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.017","article-title":"Fetal presentation and successful twin vaginal delivery","volume":"214","author":"Easter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002048","article-title":"Association between planned cesarean delivery and neonatal mortality and morbidity in twin pregnancies","volume":"129","author":"Schmitz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.041","article-title":"Twin vaginal delivery: innovate or abdicate","volume":"216","author":"Easter","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.09.034","article-title":"Clinical indicators associated with the mode of twin delivery: an analysis of 22,712 twin pairs","volume":"195","author":"Goossens","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib26","first-page":"e131","article-title":"Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 169","volume":"128","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3999","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1152252","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin gestation: lessons from a population based study","volume":"29","author":"Hamou","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002067","article-title":"Twins are not a per se indication for cesarean delivery","volume":"129","author":"Rouse","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13333","article-title":"Risk factors for cesarean delivery and adverse neonatal outcome in twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery","volume":"97","author":"Schachter-Safrai","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.12.018","article-title":"Comparison of planned caesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy: a nation wide cohort study","volume":"221","author":"Goossens","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012","article-title":"Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005\u20132014: a population-based analysis using the Robson Ten-Group Classification System","volume":"219","author":"Hehir","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182318651","article-title":"Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995\u20132008","volume":"118","author":"Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.08.031","article-title":"Trends in the delivery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006\u20132013","volume":"205","author":"Bateni","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31818475de","article-title":"Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"47","author":"Yang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(95)90280-5","article-title":"Vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean birth. ACOG Committee opinion no. 143-October 1994 (replaces No. 64, October 1988). ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice","volume":"48","year":"1995","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.012","article-title":"Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality","volume":"38","author":"Cheng","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib37","first-page":"811","article-title":"Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: an alternative viewpoint","volume":"77","author":"Scott","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"996","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90457-3","article-title":"Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section","volume":"165","author":"Farmer","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib39","first-page":"197","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 5, July 1999 (replaces practice bulletin no. 2, October 1998)","volume":"66","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib40","unstructured":"Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, et\u00a0al. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; Philadelphia, 2017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.3.171.174","article-title":"Vaginal birth of twins after a previous cesarean section","volume":"10","author":"Myles","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib43","series-title":"Birth after previous caesarean birth: Greentop guideline no. 45","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib44","first-page":"e217","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 184","volume":"130","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.057","article-title":"Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean: are patients making an informed decision?","volume":"207","author":"Bernstein","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.023","article-title":"Relationship between obstetricians' cognitive and affective traits and delivery outcomes among women with a prior cesarean","volume":"213","author":"Yee","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.058","article-title":"Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States","volume":"203","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol y"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib48","first-page":"Cd004224","article-title":"Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth","author":"Dodd","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.04.025","article-title":"Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"199","author":"Rossi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015","article-title":"Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"170","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group","volume":"283","author":"Stroup","year":"2000","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib53","unstructured":"GA Wells BS, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http:\/\/www.ohri.ca\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/oxford.asp. Accessed March 1st, 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib54","first-page":"547","article-title":"[Trial of labor after cesarean in twin gestations: does it increase maternal or neonatal complications?]","volume":"155","author":"Diamant","year":"2016","journal-title":"Harefuah"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903156700","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean section in twin pregnancies: maternal and neonatal safety","volume":"23","author":"Aaronson","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonat Medi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70274-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation","volume":"175","author":"Miller","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.023","article-title":"The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation","volume":"193","author":"Varner","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.06.038","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: is it safe?","volume":"193","author":"Cahill","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.036","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries","volume":"195","author":"Ford","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31032-5","article-title":"Twin delivery after a previous caesarean: a twelve-year experience","volume":"25","author":"Sansregret","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31031-3","article-title":"Trial of labour compared to elective caesarean in twin gestations with a previous Caesarean delivery","volume":"25","author":"Delaney","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib62","first-page":"820","article-title":"[Twin delivery after cesarean section: is a trial of labor warranted?]","volume":"28","author":"Aboulfalah","year":"1999","journal-title":"J\u00a0Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108890","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999","volume":"183","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114852","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at a community hospital","volume":"184","author":"Blanchette","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115044","article-title":"Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity","volume":"184","author":"Hibbard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017","article-title":"Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in The Netherlands","volume":"132","author":"Kwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.10.017","article-title":"Risk factors for complete uterine rupture","volume":"216","author":"Al-Zirqi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-195912000-00009","article-title":"Delivery following cesarean section","volume":"2","author":"Kaltreider","year":"1959","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.186","article-title":"The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates","volume":"188","author":"Elkousy","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib71","first-page":"36","article-title":"Previous cesarean birth. Trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants","volume":"29","author":"Phelan","year":"1984","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90224-X","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the twin gestation","volume":"161","author":"Strong","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709024607","article-title":"Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely","volume":"76","author":"Odeh","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/S1297-9589(04)00245-0","article-title":"Accouchement par voie basse des grossesses g\u00e9mellaires sur ut\u00e9rus\u00a0cicatriciel: peut-on autoriser l\u2019\u00e9preuve ut\u00e9rine?","volume":"32","author":"Coutty","year":"2004","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2014.022","article-title":"Observational and interventional study design types; an overview","volume":"24","author":"Thiese","year":"2014","journal-title":"Biochem Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14385.x","article-title":"Normal amniotic pressure throughout gestation","volume":"99","author":"Fisk","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib77","first-page":"319","article-title":"Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Pracxrice no. 155 (replaces guideline no. 147), February 2005","volume":"89","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.01.014","article-title":"Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Guideline no. 155","volume":"40","author":"Martel","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-7-5","article-title":"Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data","volume":"7","author":"Friedrich","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818311475?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937818311475?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:22:52Z","timestamp":1757589772000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937818311475"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"references-count":79,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937818311475"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}