{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T11:33:03Z","timestamp":1787311983330,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]],"date-time":"2019-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1556668800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]],"date-time":"2019-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1556668800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T11:02:42Z","timestamp":1549018962000},"page":"492.e1-492.e7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean\u00a0accurate?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"given":"Benjamin S.","family":"Harris","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R. Phillips","family":"Heine","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jinyoung","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keturah R.","family":"Faurot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maeve K.","family":"Hopkins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew J.","family":"Rivara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hanna R.","family":"Kemeny","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chad A.","family":"Grotegut","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J. Eric","family":"Jelovsek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced","article-title":"Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission","volume":"122","author":"Metz","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-0697","article-title":"Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement","volume":"162","author":"Collins","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.02.031","article-title":"Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model","volume":"188","author":"Fagerberg","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12192","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator risks","volume":"42","author":"Dresang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/01.EBP.0000541026.56018.1d","article-title":"How\u00a0good are online TOLAC calculators for predicting successful VBAC?","volume":"18","author":"Edgoose","year":"2015","journal-title":"Evid Based Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib6","first-page":"E3","article-title":"What\u2019s the best way to predict the success of a trial of labor after a previous C-section?","volume":"64","author":"Warren","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Fam Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280206074463","article-title":"Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification","volume":"16","author":"Van Buuren","year":"2007","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib8","first-page":"1","article-title":"MICE multivariate imputation by chained equations in R","volume":"45","author":"Buuren","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Stat Soft"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1239494","article-title":"Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?","volume":"26","author":"Grobman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.11.009","article-title":"Use of Brier score to assess binary predictions","volume":"63","author":"Rufibach","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1198\/000313008X370302","article-title":"Decision analysis for the evaluation of diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers","volume":"62","author":"Vickers","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am Stat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X14547233","article-title":"Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance","volume":"35","author":"Van Calster","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"948","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000744","article-title":"Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries","volume":"125","author":"Metz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)31015-X","article-title":"Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean","volume":"35","author":"Chaillet","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e31","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1599129","article-title":"Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery reveals unexpected success in a diverse American population","volume":"7","author":"Maykin","year":"2017","journal-title":"AJP Rep"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819302868?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819302868?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:22:59Z","timestamp":1757589779000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937819302868"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937819302868"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean\u00a0accurate?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}