{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T17:55:38Z","timestamp":1790963738009,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Health Policy Award"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,17]],"date-time":"2019-02-17T06:06:12Z","timestamp":1550383572000},"page":"395.e1-395.e12","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Unexpected term NICU admissions: a marker of obstetrical care quality?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5568-4444","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mark A.","family":"Clapp","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kaitlyn E.","family":"James","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sara V.","family":"Bates","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anjali J.","family":"Kaimal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.048","article-title":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Special Report: current approaches to measuring quality of care in obstetrics","volume":"215","author":"Bailit","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.07.045","article-title":"Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates","volume":"194","author":"Bailit","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.935","article-title":"Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures","volume":"214","author":"Armstrong","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib4","first-page":"45","article-title":"Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies for cesarean delivery rates","volume":"102","author":"Bailit","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d9f4b6","article-title":"Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality","volume":"115","author":"Srinivas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.013","article-title":"Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement","volume":"194","author":"Main","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001745","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001745","article-title":"Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database","volume":"11","author":"Kozhimannil","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2012.1030","article-title":"Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals: reducing variation may address quality and cost issues","volume":"32","author":"Kozhimannil","year":"2013","journal-title":"Health Aff Proj Hope"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199901073400112","article-title":"The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate","volume":"340","author":"Sachs","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.044","article-title":"\u201cDoing something\u201d about the cesarean delivery rate","volume":"219","author":"Clark","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.15553","article-title":"Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality","volume":"314","author":"Molina","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000428649.57622.a7","article-title":"Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. ACOG Committee opinion no. 561","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1389","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001737","article-title":"Oregon\u2019s hard-stop policy limiting elective early-term deliveries: association with obstetric procedure use and health outcomes","volume":"128","author":"Snowden","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.019","article-title":"US term stillbirth rates and the 39-week rule: a cause for concern?","volume":"214","author":"Nicholson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001109","article-title":"A\u00a0multi-state analysis of early-term delivery trends and the association with term stillbirth","volume":"126","author":"Little","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1542\/hpeds.2015-0058","article-title":"Variation in NICU admission rates without identifiable cause","volume":"6","author":"Ziegler","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hosp Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2017.08.028","article-title":"Regional variation in neonatal intensive care admissions and the relationship to bed supply","volume":"192","author":"Harrison","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib22","first-page":"142","article-title":"Variation in use by NICU types in the United States","author":"Edwards","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2017.3913","article-title":"Association between neonatal intensive care unit admission rates and illness acuity","volume":"172","author":"Schulman","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044","article-title":"How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?","volume":"191","author":"Cheng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.021","article-title":"Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"196","author":"Cheng","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"113","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1444","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.13986","article-title":"Effect of immediate vs delayed pushing on rates of\u00a0spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"320","author":"Cahill","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3257","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.7336","article-title":"Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis","volume":"36","author":"Austin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.2004.029454","article-title":"A\u00a0brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena","volume":"60","author":"Merlo","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-12-28","article-title":"Hospital-level associations with 30-day patient mortality after cardiac surgery: a tutorial on the application and interpretation of marginal and multilevel logistic regression","volume":"12","author":"Sanagou","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1770","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)31002-4","article-title":"Neonatal sepsis","volume":"390","author":"Shane","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib34","first-page":"332","article-title":"Late meconium passage in labor--a sign of fetal distress?","volume":"59","author":"Meis","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91856-6","article-title":"Meconium aspiration syndrome: reflections on a murky subject","volume":"166","author":"Katz","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000239439.04364.9a","article-title":"Placental abruption","volume":"108","author":"Oyelese","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1599149","article-title":"Maternal, labor, delivery, and perinatal outcomes associated with placental abruption: a systematic review","volume":"34","author":"Downes","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib39","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3 Pt 2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.038","article-title":"Cesarean delivery and respiratory distress syndrome: does labor make a difference?","volume":"193","author":"Gerten","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0803267","article-title":"Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes","volume":"360","author":"Tita","year":"2009","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816736e7","article-title":"Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress","volume":"111","author":"Yee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819303242?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819303242?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:23:53Z","timestamp":1757589833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937819303242"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937819303242"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Unexpected term NICU admissions: a marker of obstetrical care quality?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}