{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T17:55:43Z","timestamp":1782755743475,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559347200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","ajog.org","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,12]],"date-time":"2019-02-12T12:22:07Z","timestamp":1549974127000},"page":"590.e1-590.e10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":62,"title":["Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"220","author":[{"given":"Alyssa R.","family":"Hersh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ashley E.","family":"Skeith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James A.","family":"Sargent","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aaron B.","family":"Caughey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age","volume":"155","author":"Osterman","year":"2014","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.12.023","article-title":"Trends in induction of labor at early-term gestation","volume":"204","author":"Murthy","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.003","article-title":"Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age","volume":"195","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib5","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib6","first-page":"1","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor","volume":"176","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1999.tb01119.x","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a randomized trial","volume":"25","author":"Amano","year":"1999","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1978.tb10462.x","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial of selective planned delivery","volume":"85","author":"Martin","year":"1978","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500139604","article-title":"Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"18","author":"Nielsen","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90359-0","article-title":"Management of prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor versus antepartum fetal testing","volume":"156","author":"Dyson","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obs Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores","volume":"120","author":"Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obs Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255665.77009.94","article-title":"Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"109","author":"Heimstad","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor Induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib16","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2016","volume":"67","author":"Martin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.064","article-title":"31: Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study","volume":"210","author":"Yao","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib19","unstructured":"United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Department of Vital Statistics. Public-use data on CDC WONDER Online Database, for years 2007-2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12427","article-title":"Pregnancy week at delivery and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a population study of 2,014,956 deliveries","volume":"121","author":"Overland","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1159\/000049410","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury: a population-based study","volume":"53","author":"Christoffersson","year":"2002","journal-title":"Gynecol Obste Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.12195","article-title":"Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine","volume":"316","author":"Sanders","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1180","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.770464","article-title":"Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population","volume":"26","author":"Song","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12179","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of latent versus active labor hospital admission for medically low-risk, term women","volume":"42","author":"Tilden","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.003","article-title":"2: Resource utilization among low-risk nulliparas randomized to elective induction at 39 weeks or expectant management","volume":"220","author":"Grobman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1418","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.455","article-title":"Cesarean delivery on demand: what will it cost?","volume":"188","author":"Bost","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001115","article-title":"A\u00a0cost-benefit analysis of low-dose aspirin prophylaxis for the prevention of preeclampsia in the United States","volume":"126","author":"Werner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00657","article-title":"An economic analysis of the timing of microsurgical reconstruction in brachial plexus birth palsy","volume":"89","author":"Brauer","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Bone Jt Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib30","unstructured":"Waitzman N, Romano P, Scheffler R. Estimates of the economic costs of birth defects. Inquiry 2994;31:188-205."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01069.x","article-title":"Chilean women\u2019s preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?","volume":"113","author":"Angeja","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.012","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women","volume":"204","author":"Kaimal","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2006.01.001","article-title":"Estimates of the cost and length of stay changes that can be attributed to one-week increases in gestational age for premature infants","volume":"82","author":"Phibbs","year":"2006","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S287","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2005-2633H","article-title":"Comprehensive cost-utility analysis of newborn screening strategies","volume":"117","author":"Carroll","year":"2006","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.494","article-title":"Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff\u202f?","volume":"22","author":"Grobman","year":"2002","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.050","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000}}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819303588?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819303588?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,28]],"date-time":"2019-05-28T17:05:23Z","timestamp":1559063123000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937819303588"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937819303588"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","relation":{"erratum":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.050","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}