{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T23:20:42Z","timestamp":1782516042837,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]],"date-time":"2019-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561939200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]],"date-time":"2019-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561939200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,28]],"date-time":"2019-02-28T12:34:00Z","timestamp":1551357240000},"page":"63.e1-63.e13","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Significant reduction in umbilical artery metabolic acidosis after implementation of intrapartum ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"221","author":[{"given":"Anadeijda J.E.M.C.","family":"Landman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Saskia T.","family":"Immink-Duijker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eduard J.H.","family":"Mulder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria P.H.","family":"Koster","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Serena","family":"Xodo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gerard H.A.","family":"Visser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Floris","family":"Groenendaal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anneke","family":"Kwee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib1","first-page":"899","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation","volume":"81","author":"Vintzileos","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(94)00320-D","article-title":"Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis","volume":"85","author":"Vintzileos","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1021","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91320-3","article-title":"Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth","volume":"173","author":"Vintzileos","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.04.024","article-title":"Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States","volume":"204","author":"Chen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318289510d","article-title":"Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States: temporal trends and adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"121","author":"Ananth","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8674","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(89)91848-5","article-title":"Cerebral palsy among children born during the Dublin randomised trial of intrapartum monitoring","volume":"2","author":"Grant","year":"1989","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib7","first-page":"CD006066","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour","volume":"5","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1307","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08187.x","article-title":"Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision","volume":"106","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.086","article-title":"Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System","volume":"205","author":"Blackwell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12923","article-title":"Is STAN monitoring associated with a significant decrease in metabolic acidosis at birth compared with cardiotocography alone? Review of the three meta-analyses that included the recent US trial","volume":"95","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90197-2","article-title":"The relationship between circulating catecholamines and ST waveform in the fetal lamb electrocardiogram during hypoxia","volume":"149","author":"Ros\u00e9n","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.111932","article-title":"ST waveform changes during repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep","volume":"184","author":"Westgate","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance","volume":"114","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"8813","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)90465-F","article-title":"Randomised trial of cardiotocography alone or with ST waveform analysis for intrapartum monitoring","volume":"340","author":"Westgate","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9281","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8","article-title":"Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial","volume":"358","author":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01203.x","article-title":"Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-to-treat principle","volume":"90","author":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study","volume":"113","author":"Ojala","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.007","article-title":"A\u00a0French randomized controlled trial of ST-analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor","volume":"197","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181dfffd6","article-title":"Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"115","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182083dcd","article-title":"Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1500600","article-title":"A\u00a0Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-analysis","volume":"373","author":"Belfort","year":"2015","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d8230","article-title":"ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis","volume":"119","author":"Becker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1314886","article-title":"ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"29","author":"Potti","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12009","article-title":"Fetal monitoring with computerized ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"92","author":"Salmelin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib25","first-page":"CD000116","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour","volume":"5","author":"Neilson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.01.028","article-title":"Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis","volume":"208","author":"Schuit","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12412","article-title":"A\u00a0critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses","volume":"93","author":"Olofsson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib28","first-page":"CD000116","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour","author":"Neilson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001198","article-title":"Electrocardiogram ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"127","author":"Saccone","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12828","article-title":"ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"95","author":"Blix","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.121","article-title":"Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG. A multi-center, observational study","volume":"32","author":"Luttkus","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.108","article-title":"STAN in clinical practice--the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg","volume":"195","author":"Nor\u00e9n","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.11.033","article-title":"Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital","volume":"202","author":"Nor\u00e9n","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.042","article-title":"Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study","volume":"156","author":"Doret","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2011.046","article-title":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin I. Intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) and ST-analysis of labor in diabetic patients","volume":"39","author":"Yli","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib36","first-page":"307","article-title":"Foetal monitoring during labour: practice versus theory in a region-wide analysis","volume":"39","author":"Jacquemyn","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib37","first-page":"428","article-title":"Impact of fetal ECG (STAN) and competency based training on intrapartum intervention and perinatal outcomes at a teaching hospital in London: 5 year analysis","volume":"120","author":"Chandraharan","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01528.x","article-title":"Intrapartum monitoring of high-risk deliveries with ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram: an observational study of 6010 deliveries","volume":"92","author":"Kessler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"20","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib39","first-page":"3260","article-title":"ST-analysis in electronic foetal monitoring is cost-effective from both the maternal and neonatal perspective","volume":"29","author":"van 't Hooft","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1226794","article-title":"Does ST analysis of fetal ECG reduce cesarean section rate for fetal distress?","volume":"30","author":"Straface","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.017","article-title":"The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes","volume":"218","author":"Timonen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2293","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb1609216","article-title":"Real World evidence; What is it and what can it tell us?","volume":"375","author":"Sherman","year":"2016","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001727404","article-title":"STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients","volume":"15","author":"Kwee","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib44","first-page":"159","article-title":"FIGO News. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring","volume":"25","author":"Roth","year":"1987","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib45","unstructured":"Fetal monitoring and ST analysis. Neoventa Medical AB; 2007; M\u00f6lndal, Sweden."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib46","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2014 updated 2017) Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies (NICE Guideline CG190). Available at: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/cg190. Accessed January 13, 2019."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.3109\/00365517109080214","article-title":"An acid-base chart for arterial blood with normal and pathophysiological reference areas","volume":"27","author":"Siggaard-Andersen","year":"1971","journal-title":"Scand J Clin Lab Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c1471","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c1471","article-title":"Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"340","author":"Malin","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1001\/archneur.1976.00500100030012","article-title":"Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study","volume":"33","author":"Sarnat","year":"1976","journal-title":"Arch Neurol"},{"issue":"10080","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)30714-6","article-title":"The INFANT study-a flawed design foreseen","volume":"389","author":"Keith","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-7-30","article-title":"The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial","volume":"7","author":"McCarney","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001799","article-title":"Fetal Monitoring and Alert (FM-ALERT) Study Group. Central fetal monitoring with and without computer analysis: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"129","author":"Nunes","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10080","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)30568-8","article-title":"Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial","volume":"389","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500233191","article-title":"Implementation of new medical techniques: experience from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on fetal ECG during labor","volume":"18","author":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1202","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01480.x","article-title":"Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital","volume":"114","author":"Doria","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01236.x","article-title":"Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis","volume":"114","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01431.x","article-title":"Identification of cases with adverse neonatal outcome monitored by cardiotocography versus ST analysis: secondary analysis of a randomized trial","volume":"91","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.109","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiography in labor and neonatal outcome: data from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on intrapartum fetal monitoring","volume":"188","author":"Nor\u00e9n","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668284","article-title":"ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making","volume":"15","author":"Ross","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.02.007","article-title":"How deviations from STAN guidelines contribute to operative delivery for suspected fetal distress","volume":"162","author":"Massoud","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12304","article-title":"Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis","volume":"93","author":"Kessler","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02204.x","article-title":"Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN","volume":"116","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802023053","article-title":"Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies","volume":"87","author":"Ojala","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x","article-title":"Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN","volume":"116","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.002","article-title":"United States multicenter clinical usage study of the STAN 21 electronic fetal monitoring system","volume":"195","author":"Devoe","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1054\/jcaf.2003.45","article-title":"A\u00a0device is not a drug","volume":"9","author":"Konstam","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Card Fail"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.05.007","article-title":"Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: a review","volume":"30","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.4103\/1995-705X.99230","article-title":"Vitamin E and omega-3: what to believe: observational studies or randomized controlled trials?","volume":"13","author":"Yakoot","year":"2012","journal-title":"Heart View"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819304284?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819304284?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:24:38Z","timestamp":1757589878000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937819304284"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937819304284"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Significant reduction in umbilical artery metabolic acidosis after implementation of intrapartum ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.049","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}