{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T20:33:37Z","timestamp":1792701217640,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]],"date-time":"2019-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561939200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]],"date-time":"2019-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561939200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003123","name":"Fetal Medicine Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["1037116"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1037116"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003123","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,13]],"date-time":"2019-03-13T11:52:35Z","timestamp":1552477955000},"page":"65.e1-65.e18","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":69,"title":["Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35\u201337\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of adverse\u00a0perinatal outcome"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"221","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7265-5442","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ranjit","family":"Akolekar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anca","family":"Ciobanu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emilie","family":"Zingler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5856-6072","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Argyro","family":"Syngelaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kypros H.","family":"Nicolaides","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)91333-4","article-title":"Ultrasound guided sampling of umbilical cord and placental blood to assess fetal wellbeing","volume":"1","author":"Nicolaides","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6579.1051","article-title":"Prenatal asphyxia, hyperlacticaemia, hypoglycaemia and erythroblastosis in growth retarded fetuses","volume":"294","author":"Soothill","year":"1987","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.297.6655.1026","article-title":"Absence of end diastolic frequencies in the umbilical artery a sign of fetal\u00a0hypoxia and acidosis","volume":"297","author":"Nicolaides","year":"1988","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02573.x","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia","volume":"97","author":"Vyas","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","article-title":"Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"79","author":"Gramellini","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","article-title":"The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses","volume":"213","author":"DeVore","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","article-title":"Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study","volume":"208","author":"Prior","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","article-title":"Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.013","article-title":"The association between fetal Doppler and admission to neonatal unit at term","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","article-title":"Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?","volume":"216","author":"Khalil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14822","article-title":"Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"45","author":"Bakalis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14842","article-title":"Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"46","author":"Akolekar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19066","article-title":"Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models","volume":"52","author":"Hammami","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19073","article-title":"Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts","volume":"52","author":"Nicolaides","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20157","article-title":"Fetal Medicine Foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"53","author":"Ciobanu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x","article-title":"A\u00a0critical evaluation of sonar crown rump length measurements","volume":"82","author":"Robinson","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x","article-title":"Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks' gestation","volume":"4","author":"Snijders","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03335.x","article-title":"The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples","volume":"119","author":"Yeh","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance","volume":"114","author":"Amer-Wahlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib22","series-title":"Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1093\/clinchem\/39.4.561","article-title":"Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine","volume":"39","author":"Zweig","year":"1993","journal-title":"Clin Chem"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","article-title":"Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.227","article-title":"Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: Screening by maternal factors and biomarkers at 35-37 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"220","author":"Ciobanu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.043","article-title":"Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies","volume":"215","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.008","article-title":"Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes","volume":"218","author":"Madden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.01.037","article-title":"Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low-risk population: an observational study","volume":"116","author":"Bais","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16237.x","article-title":"The implications of introducing the symphyseal-fundal height-measurement. A prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"97","author":"Lindhard","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.004","article-title":"Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy","volume":"218","author":"McCowan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70347-2","article-title":"Receiver-operator characteristic curves for the ultrasonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in low-risk pregnancies","volume":"174","author":"David","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14771","article-title":"Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30\u201334 weeks","volume":"45","author":"Bakalis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.002","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction using fetal biometry combined with maternal biomarkers","volume":"218","author":"Gaccioli","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.003","article-title":"Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"218","author":"Figueras","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002_bib36","article-title":"Routine ultrasound at 30-34 and 35-36 weeks\u2019 gestation: prediction of small for gestational age neonates","author":"Ciobanu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819304776?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819304776?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T13:30:44Z","timestamp":1777383044000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937819304776"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937819304776"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35\u201337\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of adverse\u00a0perinatal outcome","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}