{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T16:53:49Z","timestamp":1790528029290,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":95,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,4]],"date-time":"2019-10-04T01:45:48Z","timestamp":1570153548000},"page":"642.e1-642.e13","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"title":["Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"221","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7201-0206","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea","family":"Dall\u2019Asta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laura","family":"Angeli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bianca","family":"Masturzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicola","family":"Volpe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5031-8282","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giovanni Battista Luca","family":"Schera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elvira","family":"Di Pasquo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Flavia","family":"Girlando","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rossella","family":"Attini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guido","family":"Menato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tiziana","family":"Frusca","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tullio","family":"Ghi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib1","series-title":"Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.926","article-title":"Second-stage labor: how long is too long?","volume":"214","author":"Leveno","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib4","first-page":"266","article-title":"Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity","volume":"49","author":"Cohen","year":"1977","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1568","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(54)90311-7","article-title":"The graphic analysis of labor","volume":"68","author":"Friedman","year":"1954","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-195512000-00001","article-title":"Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis","volume":"6","author":"Pitkin","year":"1955","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-195612000-00007","article-title":"Labor in multiparas: a graphicostatistical analysis","volume":"8","author":"Friedman","year":"1956","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.09.008","article-title":"Perils of the new labor management guidelines","volume":"212","author":"Cohen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.042","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines","volume":"214","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.228","article-title":"Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"218","author":"Thuillier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002431","article-title":"Reassessing the duration of the second stage of labor in relation to maternal and neonatal morbidity","volume":"131","author":"Grantz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31991-3","article-title":"The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial","volume":"393","author":"Bernitz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.007","article-title":"New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns","volume":"217","author":"Rosenbloom","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.028","article-title":"The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"220","author":"Zipori","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00129.x","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review","volume":"33","author":"Altman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.003","article-title":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes","volume":"201","author":"Rouse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12935","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labour increases maternal morbidity but not neonatal morbidity","volume":"59","author":"Matta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000278","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"124","author":"Laughon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.214","article-title":"Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study","volume":"37","author":"Sandstr\u00f6m","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.003","article-title":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes","volume":"201","author":"Rouse","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"113","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001354","article-title":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Association of the duration of active pushing with obstetric outcomes","volume":"127","author":"Grobman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.002","article-title":"When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia","volume":"201","author":"Le Ray","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib25","article-title":"Second stage labor: consensus versus science","author":"Nelson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182749ac9","article-title":"Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes","volume":"121","author":"Walsh","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2539","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1440545","article-title":"Differences in outcomes between cesarean section in the second versus the first stages of labor","volume":"32","author":"Vitner","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor","volume":"19","author":"Sherer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.029","article-title":"Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor","volume":"191","author":"Chou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12422","article-title":"Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor","volume":"41","author":"Tutschek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009","article-title":"Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination","volume":"123","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001","article-title":"Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study","volume":"164","author":"Ramphul","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x","article-title":"A\u00a0study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent","volume":"118","author":"Tutschek","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6294","article-title":"Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?","volume":"33","author":"Kalache","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12378","article-title":"Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station","volume":"41","author":"Gilboa","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1560","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.868430","article-title":"Ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor: does it reduce the operative delivery rate?","volume":"27","author":"Masturzo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14951","article-title":"Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure","volume":"48","author":"Bultez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1348","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1048680","article-title":"Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery","volume":"29","author":"Sainz","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.009","article-title":"Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study","volume":"217","author":"Kahrs","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.007","article-title":"Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station","volume":"216","author":"Kasbaoui","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12712","article-title":"Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"144","author":"Chan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13230","article-title":"Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound used to predict cases of complicated operative (vacuum and forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women","volume":"96","author":"Sainz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035","article-title":"A\u00a0simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps","volume":"220","author":"Sainz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.017","article-title":"Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study","volume":"216","author":"Burke","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12439","article-title":"How to perform ultrasound in labor: assessment of fetal occiput position","volume":"41","author":"Youssef","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6313","article-title":"Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Ghi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2744","article-title":"Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"27","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6329","article-title":"A\u00a0new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Barbera","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12335","article-title":"Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor","volume":"41","author":"Youssef","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.2307\/2531595","article-title":"Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach","volume":"44","author":"DeLong","year":"1988","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044","article-title":"How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?","volume":"191","author":"Cheng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.021","article-title":"Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"196","author":"Cheng","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib55","first-page":"1","article-title":"Pushing the limits: perinatal outcomes beyond prolonged second stage","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1314894","article-title":"An analysis of second-stage labor beyond 3 hours in nulliparous women","volume":"29","author":"Bleich","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000368","article-title":"Prolonged second stage: what is the optimal length?","volume":"71","author":"Gimovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12810","article-title":"Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery","volume":"121","author":"Ramphul","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe","volume":"109","author":"Alexander","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"410.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.040","article-title":"Infectious morbidity is higher after second-stage compared with first-stage cesareans","volume":"211","author":"Tuuli","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.005","article-title":"Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"197","author":"Sung","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.007","article-title":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events","volume":"214","author":"Bailit","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.589","article-title":"Second stage cesarean as risk factor for preterm birth: how to manage subsequent pregnancies?","volume":"218","author":"Watson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.09.035","article-title":"Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth?","volume":"212","author":"Levine","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.031","article-title":"Perinatal Research Consortium. Length of the second stage of labor and preterm delivery risk in the subsequent pregnancy","volume":"219","author":"Qui\u00f1ones","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.019","article-title":"Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"217","author":"Berghella","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.006","article-title":"Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the risk of subsequent premature birth","volume":"217","author":"Wood","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.919","article-title":"Length of second stage of labor and preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy","volume":"214","author":"Levine","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01302.x","article-title":"The impact of a trial of instrumental delivery in theatre on neonatal outcome","volume":"114","author":"Olagundoye","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.001","article-title":"Predictors of shoulder dystocia at the time of operative vaginal delivery","volume":"215","author":"Palatnik","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001273","article-title":"Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"127","author":"Palatnik","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12137","article-title":"Influence of the duration of the second stage of labor on the likelihood of obstetric anal sphincter injury","volume":"42","author":"Aiken","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.012","article-title":"Medico-legal considerations and operative vaginal delivery","volume":"56","author":"Murphy","year":"2019","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.003","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery","volume":"56","author":"Murphy","year":"2019","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.10.871","article-title":"Cohort study of the decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome for emergency operative vaginal delivery","volume":"196","author":"Murphy","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.10.601","article-title":"Pelvic floor morbidity at 3 years after instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the impact of a subsequent delivery","volume":"192","author":"Bahl","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13186","article-title":"Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496","volume":"122","author":"Ramphul","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.05.021","article-title":"Transabdominal ultrasound assessment of the fetal head and the accuracy of the vacuum cup application","volume":"98","author":"Wong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14951","article-title":"Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure","volume":"48","author":"Bultez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19091","article-title":"Randomised Italian Sonography for occiput POSition Trial Ante vacuum (R.I.S.POS.T.A.)","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.011","article-title":"Comment on: predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station","volume":"217","author":"Ducarme","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12454","article-title":"Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor","volume":"93","author":"Youssef","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13324","article-title":"Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery","volume":"44","author":"Ghi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.05.040","article-title":"Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring Cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor","volume":"221","author":"Tse","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.020","article-title":"The \u201cocciput-spine angle\u201d: a new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor","volume":"215","author":"Ghi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.028","article-title":"Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification","volume":"192","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12810","article-title":"Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery","volume":"121","author":"Ramphul","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.103","article-title":"Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery","volume":"21","author":"Akmal","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13385","article-title":"Sonographic diagnosis of lateral asynclitism: a new subtype of fetal head malposition as a main determinant of early labor arrest","volume":"45","author":"Ghi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.028","article-title":"The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations","volume":"218","author":"Gustapane","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-110008","article-title":"Intrapartum sonographic diagnosis of compound hand-cephalic presentation","volume":"38","author":"Dall'Asta","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15944","article-title":"Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor","volume":"49","author":"Yonetani","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20348","article-title":"Descent of the fetal head during active pushing: a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study investigating ultrasound examinations before an operative vaginal delivery","volume":"54","author":"Kahrs","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17302","article-title":"Intrapartum diagnosis of posterior asynclitism using two-dimensional transperineal ultrasound","volume":"49","author":"Ghi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819312116?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937819312116?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:26:01Z","timestamp":1757589961000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937819312116"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"references-count":95,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937819312116"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}