{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,2]],"date-time":"2026-04-02T20:12:58Z","timestamp":1775160778135,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]],"date-time":"2020-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1585699200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]],"date-time":"2020-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1585699200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,16]],"date-time":"2020-01-16T19:08:55Z","timestamp":1579201735000},"page":"342.e1-342.e4","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Guidelines for labor assessment: failure to progress?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"222","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3638-9519","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wayne R.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emanuel A.","family":"Friedman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.09.008","article-title":"Perils of the new labor management guidelines","volume":"212","author":"Cohen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.09.008","article-title":"Viewpoint: misguided guidelines for managing labor","volume":"212","author":"Cohen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1567","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1406474","article-title":"Obstetric practice guidelines: labor\u2019s love lost?","volume":"32","author":"Cohen","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Maternal-Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.12712","article-title":"Management of labor: are the new guidelines justified?","volume":"63","author":"Cohen","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182704880","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop","volume":"120","author":"Spong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","volume":"123","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127142","article-title":"Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women","volume":"187","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.014","article-title":"Statistical aspects of modeling the labor curve","volume":"212","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.044","article-title":"\u201cDoing something\u201d about the cesarean delivery rate","volume":"219","author":"Clark","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002636","article-title":"Variation in the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean rate","volume":"131","author":"Pasko","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-013-0491-2","article-title":"Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications","volume":"64","author":"Mittal","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1384","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.88.9.1384","article-title":"Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994","volume":"88","author":"Gregory","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.926","article-title":"Second-stage labor: how long is too long?","volume":"214","author":"Leveno","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib15","article-title":"Second-stage labor: consensus vs science","author":"Nelson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2016.04.093","article-title":"Management of spontaneous labour at term in healthy women","volume":"38","author":"Lee","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Canada"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.09.011","article-title":"Evolving understanding and treatment of labour dystocia","volume":"182","author":"Karacam","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1286","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32113-5","article-title":"FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean epidemic","volume":"392","author":"Visser","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4046-5","article-title":"Prevention of primary caesarean delivery: comprehensive management of dystocia in nulliparous patients at term","volume":"294","author":"Ragusa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib20","series-title":"WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001488","article-title":"Reduction in the cesarean delivery rate after obstetric care consensus guideline implementation","volume":"128","author":"Wilson-Leedy","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.243","article-title":"Maternal and fetal impact of SMFM guidelines to prevent the first cesarean delivery","volume":"212","author":"Hoffman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.007","article-title":"New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns","volume":"217","author":"Rosenbloom","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.228","article-title":"Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"218","author":"Thullier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31991-3","article-title":"The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph vs. Zhang\u2019s guideline in the Labor Progression Study (LaPS): a multicenter, cluster-randomised controlled trial","volume":"393","author":"Bernitz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003109","article-title":"Safety assessment of a large-scale improvement collaborative to reduce nulliparous cesarean delivery rates","volume":"133","author":"Main","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.028","article-title":"The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"220","author":"Zipori","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib28","series-title":"Stress and developmental programming in health and disease: beyond phenomenology","first-page":"651","article-title":"Fetal neurological injury related to mechanical forces of labor and delivery","author":"Schifrin","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib29","series-title":"Birth trauma and perinatal brain damage","author":"Vlasyuk","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib30","first-page":"ID2120835","article-title":"White matter damage in 4725 term-born infants is determined by head circumference at birth: the missing link","author":"Jensen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Intl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3030","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1993.03500230112038","article-title":"Technology follies: the uncritical acceptance of medical innovation","volume":"269","author":"Grimes","year":"1993","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12582","article-title":"Lowered national cesarean section rates after a concerted action","volume":"94","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198812083192304","article-title":"A\u00a0successful program to lower cesarean-section rates","volume":"319","author":"Meyers","year":"1988","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.06.040","article-title":"Implementation of a laborist program and evaluation of the effect on cesarean delivery","volume":"209","author":"Iriye","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2012-0181","article-title":"Reduction of cesarean delivery rates after implementation of a comprehensive patient safety program","volume":"41","author":"Grunebaum","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293782030020X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293782030020X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:27:07Z","timestamp":1757590027000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293782030020X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293782030020X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Guidelines for labor assessment: failure to progress?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.013","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}