{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T03:12:39Z","timestamp":1792293159861,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,18]],"date-time":"2020-07-18T10:39:38Z","timestamp":1595068778000},"page":"93.e1-93.e7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"224","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9170-6345","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Larry","family":"Hinkson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Henrich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Boris","family":"Tutschek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14553","article-title":"Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005\u20132013: a population-based study","volume":"124","author":"Merriam","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.003","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery","volume":"56","author":"Murphy","year":"2019","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.09.004","article-title":"Global perspectives on operative vaginal deliveries","volume":"56","author":"Vannevel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.287.6388.315","article-title":"Should we abandon Kielland\u2019s forceps?","volume":"287","author":"Cardozo","year":"1983","journal-title":"Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1526","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12398","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study","volume":"120","author":"Bahl","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01060.x","article-title":"Kjelland\u2019s forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery","volume":"49","author":"Al-Suhel","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70180-8","article-title":"The role of forceps rotation in maternal and neonatal injury","volume":"180","author":"Hankins","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182695581","article-title":"Use and safety of Kielland\u2019s forceps in current obstetric practice","volume":"120","author":"Burke","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.11.047","article-title":"The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries","volume":"192","author":"Benavides","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.059","article-title":"Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries","volume":"193","author":"Wu","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3848","article-title":"Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction","volume":"28","author":"Henrich","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib13","author":"Murphy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x","article-title":"A\u00a0study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent","volume":"118","author":"Tutschek","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib15","author":"Fernando"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.3109\/01443611003628411","article-title":"Changing trends in operative delivery performed at full dilatation over a 10-year period","volume":"30","author":"Loudon","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.10.001","article-title":"Skills training for operative vaginal birth","volume":"56","author":"Hotton","year":"2019","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.08.044","article-title":"Second-stage labor: consensus versus science","volume":"222","author":"Nelson","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.228","article-title":"Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"218","author":"Thuillier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.028","article-title":"The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"220","author":"Zipori","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045","article-title":"Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"221","author":"Dall\u2019Asta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.023","article-title":"Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis","volume":"212","author":"Aiken","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12199","article-title":"A\u00a0re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour","volume":"120","author":"Tempest","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000221","article-title":"Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland\u2019s forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes","volume":"27","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829752fc","article-title":"Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries","volume":"122","author":"Bradley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70105-5","article-title":"Rotational versus nonrotational forceps: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"181","author":"Feldman","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008","article-title":"Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend","volume":"157","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.007","article-title":"Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events","volume":"214","author":"Bailit","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7451.1302","article-title":"Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice","volume":"328","author":"Patel","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.3.172.177","article-title":"Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position","volume":"12","author":"Akmal","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7521","article-title":"Measurement of fetal head descent using the \u2018angle of progression\u2019 on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise","volume":"35","author":"D\u00fcckelmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13186","article-title":"Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496","volume":"122","author":"Ramphul","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.531322","article-title":"Teaching 3-dimensional fetal ultrasound: a randomized study","volume":"24","author":"Solt","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009","article-title":"Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination","volume":"123","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1196476","article-title":"Training on Kielland\u2019s forceps: a survey of trainees\u2019 opinions","volume":"37","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043","article-title":"Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"159","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.051","article-title":"Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience","volume":"197","author":"Ben-Haroush","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19177","article-title":"Virtual reality objects improve learning efficiency and retention of diagnostic ability in fetal ultrasound","volume":"53","author":"Ebert","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293782030747X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293782030747X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:30:51Z","timestamp":1757590251000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293782030747X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S000293782030747X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}