{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,16]],"date-time":"2026-04-16T06:05:05Z","timestamp":1776319505650,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]],"date-time":"2021-01-04T17:55:32Z","timestamp":1609782932000},"page":"609.e1-609.e11","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":49,"title":["Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"224","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0178-1086","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rasha A.","family":"Kamel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sherif M.","family":"Negm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aly","family":"Youssef","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luca","family":"Bianchini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elena","family":"Brunelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gianluigi","family":"Pilu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mahmoud","family":"Soliman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kypros H.","family":"Nicolaides","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7315","article-title":"Validation of models that predict cesarean section after induction of labor","volume":"34","author":"Verhoeven","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1159\/000433429","article-title":"Definition of failed induction of labor and its predictive factors: two unsolved issues of an everyday clinical situation","volume":"38","author":"Ban\u00f5s","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"908","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000428648.75548.00","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion no. 560: medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117","article-title":"Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older","volume":"374","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.556","article-title":"Defining failed induction of labor","volume":"218","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00018","article-title":"What is a failed labor induction?","volume":"49","author":"Lin","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002425","article-title":"Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: an English national cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Knight","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2016.07.005","article-title":"Induction of labour","volume":"26","author":"Ryan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"770","DOI":"10.2298\/SARH1312770T","article-title":"[Prediction of labor induction outcome using different clinical parameters]","volume":"141","author":"Stupar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Srp Arh Celok Lek"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001083","article-title":"Predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor among nulliparous women at term","volume":"126","author":"Tolcher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5360","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor","volume":"32","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15808","article-title":"Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery","volume":"48","author":"Ghi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3848","article-title":"Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction","volume":"28","author":"Henrich","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6329","article-title":"A\u00a0new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Barbera","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12956","article-title":"Does ultrasound determination of fetal occiput position improve labour outcome?","volume":"121","author":"Ghi","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.028","article-title":"Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification","volume":"192","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00336-1","article-title":"Reliability of the bishop score before labour induction at term","volume":"112","author":"Faltin-Traub","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib20","first-page":"214","article-title":"The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length","volume":"79","author":"Jackson","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.166","article-title":"Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for cesarean section","volume":"22","author":"Rane","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701409858","article-title":"Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the bishop score in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"86","author":"G\u00f3mez Laencina","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2004.11.006","article-title":"Comparison of pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins","volume":"33","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.1032002","article-title":"Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?","volume":"170","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1090-x","article-title":"Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study","volume":"16","author":"Khazardoost","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x","article-title":"A\u00a0study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent","volume":"118","author":"Tutschek","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13251","article-title":"Reproducibility and acceptability of ultrasound measurements of head-perineum distance","volume":"97","author":"Benediktsdottir","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009","article-title":"Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination","volume":"123","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.13.1.59.63","article-title":"Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor","volume":"13","author":"Souka","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7521","article-title":"Measurement of fetal head descent using the \u2018angle of progression\u2019 on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise","volume":"35","author":"D\u00fcckelmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1765","article-title":"Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique","volume":"25","author":"Dietz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.825598","article-title":"Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review","volume":"27","author":"Malvasi","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.075","article-title":"Modified Bishop\u2019s score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"191","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8831","article-title":"Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan","volume":"37","author":"Salomon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.025","article-title":"The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations","volume":"217","author":"Bellussi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1100","article-title":"The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor","volume":"24","author":"Rane","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12439","article-title":"How to perform ultrasound in labor: assessment of fetal occiput position","volume":"41","author":"Youssef","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.3.172.177","article-title":"Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position","volume":"12","author":"Akmal","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14742","article-title":"How to measure cervical length","volume":"45","author":"Kagan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.013","article-title":"Contraction of the levator ani muscle during valsalva maneuver (coactivation) is associated with a longer active second stage of labor in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor","volume":"220","author":"Kamel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13204","article-title":"Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active labor","volume":"43","author":"Youssef","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2744","article-title":"Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"27","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(95)00048-8","article-title":"Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates","volume":"48","author":"Peduzzi","year":"1995","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta21180","article-title":"Development and validation of prediction models for risks of complications in early-onset pre-eclampsia (PREP): a prospective cohort study","volume":"21","author":"Thangaratinam","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1284226","article-title":"Prediction of neonatal metabolic acidosis in women with a singleton term pregnancy in cephalic presentation","volume":"29","author":"Westerhuis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1276","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.7992","article-title":"Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes","volume":"38","author":"Riley","year":"2019","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1037\/a0027127","article-title":"Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC)","volume":"17","author":"Vrieze","year":"2012","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X19874237","article-title":"cvauroc: command to compute cross-validated area under the curve for ROC analysis after predictive modeling for binary outcomes","volume":"19","author":"Luque-Fernandez","year":"2019","journal-title":"Stata J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1608847","article-title":"Predicting vaginal delivery in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor at term","volume":"35","author":"Kawakita","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000196508.11431.c0","article-title":"Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor","volume":"107","author":"Peregrine","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500127690","article-title":"Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length","volume":"17","author":"Rane","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19169","article-title":"How reliable is fetal occiput and spine position assessment prior to induction of labor?","volume":"53","author":"Kamel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.053","article-title":"A\u00a0validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"219","author":"Abraham","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.603","article-title":"A\u00a0validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"218","author":"Levine","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15931","article-title":"Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor","volume":"49","author":"Gillor","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11195","article-title":"Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?","volume":"40","author":"Levy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13411","article-title":"Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography","volume":"44","author":"Pereira","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.02.021","article-title":"Levator hiatus dimensions in late pregnancy and the process of labor: a 3- and 4-dimensional transperineal ultrasound study","volume":"210","author":"Siafarikas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2007.00714.x","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the levator hiatus in late pregnancy and associations with delivery outcomes","volume":"47","author":"Lanzarone","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20159","article-title":"Levator ani muscle coactivation at term is associated with longer second stage of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"53","author":"Youssef","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2353","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.24494","article-title":"The dynamic change of the anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus under valsalva maneuver at term and labor outcome","volume":"39","author":"Brunelli","year":"2020","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21982","article-title":"Transperineal ultrasound assessment of maternal pelvic floor at term and fetal head engagement","volume":"56","author":"Youssef","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib64","article-title":"Dynamic changes of fetal head descent at term before the onset of labor correlate with labor outcome and can be improved by ultrasound visual feedback","author":"Youssef","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib65","first-page":"745","article-title":"Induction of labour at term","volume":"23","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0SOGC"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1276","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.7992","article-title":"Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II\u2014binary and time-to-event outcomes","volume":"38","author":"Riley","year":"2019","journal-title":"Stat Med"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937820326296?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937820326296?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:32:59Z","timestamp":1757590379000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937820326296"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"references-count":67,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937820326296"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1212","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}