{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,2]],"date-time":"2026-11-02T07:56:40Z","timestamp":1793606200215,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,2]],"date-time":"2021-02-02T13:55:31Z","timestamp":1612274131000},"page":"55.e1-55.e17","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in\u00a0vitro fertilization cycles"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"225","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3847-6034","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Malinda","family":"Lee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katherine T.","family":"Lofgren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ann","family":"Thomas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Lanes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Randi","family":"Goldman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth S.","family":"Ginsburg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark D.","family":"Hornstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035","article-title":"Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in\u00a0vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"100","author":"Scott","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038","article-title":"Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis","volume":"104","author":"Dahdouh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.06.021","article-title":"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage","volume":"110","author":"Neal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002","article-title":"The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion","volume":"109","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/1755-8166-5-24","article-title":"Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study","volume":"5","author":"Yang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Mol Cytogenet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056","article-title":"In\u00a0vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"100","author":"Forman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","article-title":"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial","volume":"112","author":"Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in\u00a0vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss","volume":"103","author":"Murugappan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1515","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-1001-8","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening for women older than 37 undergoing in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"34","author":"Collins","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.01.025","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies","volume":"111","author":"Somigliana","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.05.026","article-title":"Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update","volume":"106","author":"Toner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1641","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1275-5","article-title":"The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool","volume":"35","author":"Goldman","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.06.035","article-title":"Management of the first in\u00a0vitro fertilization cycle for unexplained infertility: a cost-effectiveness analysis of split in\u00a0vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection","volume":"100","author":"Vitek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex257","article-title":"Modeling of live-birth rates and cost-effectiveness of oocyte cryopreservation for cancer patients prior to high- and low-risk gonadotoxic chemotherapy","volume":"32","author":"Lyttle Schumacher","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.005","article-title":"Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States","volume":"209","author":"Lemos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa034","article-title":"The status of preimplantation genetic testing in the UK and USA","volume":"35","author":"Theobald","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.026","article-title":"Effectiveness of in\u00a0vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012","volume":"106","author":"Kushnir","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039","article-title":"Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial","volume":"100","author":"Scott","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937821000764?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937821000764?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:33:30Z","timestamp":1757590410000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937821000764"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937821000764"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in\u00a0vitro fertilization cycles","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}