{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,27]],"date-time":"2026-10-27T03:19:43Z","timestamp":1793071183694,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,1]],"date-time":"2021-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1614556800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,1]],"date-time":"2021-03-01T11:55:08Z","timestamp":1614599708000},"page":"189.e1-189.e30","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Diagnostic quality of 3Tesla postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with and without congenital heart disease"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"225","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1265-6213","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Barbara","family":"Ulm","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gregor O.","family":"Dovjak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anke","family":"Scharrer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dana A.","family":"Muin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Zimpfer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniela","family":"Prayer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vanessa","family":"Berger-Kulemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958405","article-title":"Congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005","volume":"123","author":"Dolk","year":"2011","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2710","article-title":"Prenatal detection of heart defects in a non-selected population of 30,149 fetuses--detection rates and outcome","volume":"27","author":"Tegnander","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00385.x","article-title":"Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries","volume":"17","author":"Garne","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2016.05.087","article-title":"Discordances between pre-natal and post-natal diagnoses of congenital heart diseases and impact on care strategies","volume":"68","author":"Bensemlali","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1384","DOI":"10.1016\/j.echo.2020.06.017","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of fetal echocardiography in congenital heart disease","volume":"33","author":"Mozumdar","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Soc Echocardiogr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17522","article-title":"Color and power Doppler combined with Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) to evaluate the fetal heart","volume":"50","author":"Yeo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.05.017","article-title":"No. 365-fetal and perinatal autopsy in prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormalities with normal chromosome analysis","volume":"40","author":"Fallet-Bianco","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15773","article-title":"Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in 1029 fetuses following termination of pregnancy","volume":"48","author":"Struksnaes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)60134-8","article-title":"Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study","volume":"382","author":"Thayyil","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15591","article-title":"Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed-methods study with bereaved parents","volume":"126","author":"Lewis","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib11","first-page":"323","article-title":"The importance of perinatal autopsy. Review of the literature and series of cases","volume":"58","author":"\u015eorop-Florea","year":"2017","journal-title":"Rom J Morphol Embryol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp0707996","article-title":"The vanishing nonforensic autopsy","volume":"358","author":"Shojania","year":"2008","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-019-0762-2","article-title":"Perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): radiological-pathological correlation","volume":"10","author":"Shelmerdine","year":"2019","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.04.034","article-title":"Fetal postmortem imaging: an overview of current techniques and future perspectives","volume":"223","author":"Kang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4070","article-title":"A\u00a0morphometric study of the human fetal heart on post-mortem 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"33","author":"Sandaite","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4283","article-title":"Fetal heart pathology on postmortem 3-T magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"34","author":"Sandaite","year":"2014","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3542","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4725-4","article-title":"Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy","volume":"27","author":"Kang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11191","article-title":"Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20 weeks\u2019 gestation: a comparison of high-field MRI at 9.4 T with lower-field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy","volume":"40","author":"Votino","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1937","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005641","article-title":"Postmortem cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses and children: a masked comparison study with conventional autopsy","volume":"129","author":"Taylor","year":"2014","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13548","article-title":"Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging vs autopsy of second trimester fetuses terminated due to anomalies","volume":"98","author":"Hellkvist","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033149","article-title":"Methods for the evaluation of image quality: a review","volume":"90","author":"M\u00e5nsson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.040","article-title":"Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for early gestation fetuses: a validation study against conventional autopsy","volume":"218","author":"Hutchinson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15764","article-title":"Clinical utility of postmortem microcomputed tomography of the fetal heart: diagnostic imaging vs macroscopic dissection","volume":"47","author":"Hutchinson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.019","article-title":"Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies: experience in >250 human fetuses","volume":"224","author":"Shelmerdine","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5448","article-title":"Is traditional perinatal autopsy needed after detailed fetal ultrasound and post-mortem MRI?","volume":"39","author":"Shelmerdine","year":"2019","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-012-9709-3","article-title":"The slow death of autopsies: a retrospective analysis of the autopsy prevalence rate in Austria from 1990 to 2009","volume":"27","author":"Gaensbacher","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2009.10.019","article-title":"The value teleradiology represents for Europe: a study of lessons learned in the U.S","volume":"73","author":"Pechet","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937821001460?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937821001460?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:33:27Z","timestamp":1757590407000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937821001460"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937821001460"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Diagnostic quality of 3Tesla postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with and without congenital heart disease","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}