{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T21:27:08Z","timestamp":1791581228960,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":108,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]],"date-time":"2021-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633046400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100014349","name":"Society For Maternal-Fetal Medicine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100014349","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,23]],"date-time":"2021-06-23T02:48:35Z","timestamp":1624416515000},"page":"B2-B15","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":92,"title":["Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #57: Evaluation and management of isolated soft ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in the second trimester"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"225","author":[{"given":"Malavika","family":"Prabhu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey A.","family":"Kuller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph R.","family":"Biggio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.163.3.2953039","article-title":"Down syndrome: sonographic sign for diagnosis in the second-trimester fetus","volume":"163","author":"Benacerraf","year":"1987","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1371","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198711263172203","article-title":"Sonographic identification of second-trimester fetuses with Down\u2019s syndrome","volume":"317","author":"Benacerraf","year":"1987","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib3","first-page":"58","article-title":"Fetal pyelectasis: a possible association with Down syndrome","volume":"76","author":"Benacerraf","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80059-5","article-title":"A sonographic screening method for Down syndrome","volume":"157","author":"Lockwood","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.039","article-title":"Mild fetal ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, evaluation, and management","volume":"219","author":"Fox","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2001","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa043693","article-title":"First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down\u2019s syndrome","volume":"353","author":"Malone","year":"2005","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e48","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004084","article-title":"Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. ACOG Practice Bulletin, number 226","volume":"136","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.005","article-title":"The role of ultrasound in women who undergo cell-free DNA screening","volume":"216","author":"Norton","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.01.032","article-title":"No. 348-joint SOGC-CCMG guideline: update on prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, fetal anomalies, and adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"39","author":"Audibert","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13393","article-title":"ISUOG consensus statement on the impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on prenatal ultrasound practice","volume":"44","author":"Salomon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.33.5.745","volume":"33","author":"Reddy","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.12010008.x","article-title":"Age-adjusted ultrasound risk assessment for fetal Down\u2019s syndrome during the second trimester: description of the method and analysis of 142 cases","volume":"12","author":"Nyberg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17484","article-title":"Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis","volume":"50","author":"Gil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13030167.x","article-title":"Maternal age- and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21","volume":"13","author":"Snijders","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2000.19.1.1","article-title":"Obstetrical sonography: the best way to terrify a pregnant woman","volume":"19","author":"Filly","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2277","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14572","article-title":"Obstetric sonography: why are we still terrifying pregnant women?","volume":"37","author":"Filly","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32835e14eb","article-title":"The continuing enigma of the fetal echogenic intracardiac focus in prenatal ultrasound","volume":"25","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2013","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1998.17.2.127","article-title":"Significance of an echogenic intracardiac focus in fetuses at high and low risk for aneuploidy","volume":"17","author":"Bromley","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2003.22.11.1207","article-title":"Echogenic intracardiac focus: potential for misdiagnosis","volume":"22","author":"Winn","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2903","article-title":"Cardiac biometry and function in euploid fetuses with intracardiac echogenic foci","volume":"32","author":"Facio","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s00246-009-9524-0","article-title":"Intracardiac echogenic foci have no hemodynamic significance in the fetus","volume":"31","author":"Perles","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pediatr Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2003.22.8.783","article-title":"Childhood cardiac function after prenatal diagnosis of intracardiac echogenic foci","volume":"22","author":"Wax","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00323-J","article-title":"Echogenic intracardiac focus: a sonographic sign for fetal Down syndrome","volume":"86","author":"Bromley","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1639","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2009.28.12.1639","article-title":"Echogenic intracardiac foci: associated with increased risk for fetal trisomy 21 or not?","volume":"28","author":"Shanks","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib26","first-page":"1009","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of intracardiac echogenic foci for Down syndrome: a meta-analysis","volume":"101","author":"Sotiriadis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1935","article-title":"Ethnic variation in the prevalence of echogenic intracardiac foci and the association with Down syndrome","volume":"26","author":"Tran","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-4-12","article-title":"An ethnic predilection for fetal echogenic intracardiac focus identified during targeted midtrimester ultrasound examination: a retrospective review","volume":"4","author":"Rebarber","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00138.x","article-title":"The frequency of the detection of fetal echogenic intracardiac foci with respect to maternal race","volume":"15","author":"Shipp","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1994.13.8.613","article-title":"Left ventricular echogenic focus in the fetal heart: pathologic correlation","volume":"13","author":"Brown","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2004.23.4.489","article-title":"An isolated echogenic heart focus is not an indication for amniocentesis in 12,672 unselected patients","volume":"23","author":"Coco","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.10.1053","article-title":"Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy","volume":"20","author":"Nyberg","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1044","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.285.8.1044","article-title":"Second-trimester ultrasound to detect fetuses with Down syndrome: a meta-analysis","volume":"285","author":"Smith-Bindman","year":"2001","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12364","article-title":"Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21","volume":"41","author":"Agathokleous","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2002.21.10.1087","article-title":"The genetic sonogram: a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second trimester","volume":"21","author":"Bromley","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib36","series-title":"Callen\u2019s ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the fetal gastrointestinal tract and abdominal wall","author":"Nadel","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821aa739","article-title":"Echogenic bowel on second-trimester ultrasonography: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome","volume":"117","author":"Goetzinger","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4708","article-title":"Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population-based cohort","volume":"36","author":"Hurt","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.261","article-title":"Hyperechogenic fetal bowel and Down syndrome. Results of a French collaborative study based on 680 prospective cases","volume":"22","author":"Simon-Bouy","year":"2002","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00241.x","article-title":"Fetal echogenic bowel: parameters to be considered in differential diagnosis","volume":"16","author":"Strocker","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70310-1","article-title":"Second-trimester echogenic bowel and intraamniotic bleeding: association between fetal bowel echogenicity and amniotic fluid spectrophotometry at 410 nm","volume":"174","author":"Sepulveda","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib42","first-page":"684","article-title":"Intra-amniotic bleeding and fetal echogenic bowel","volume":"93","author":"Petrikovsky","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00009","article-title":"Fetal hyperechogenic bowel following intra-amniotic bleeding","volume":"83","author":"Sepulveda","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117671","article-title":"The clinical significance of fetal echogenic bowel","volume":"185","author":"Al-Kouatly","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib45","first-page":"647","article-title":"Is fetal hyperechoic bowel on second-trimester sonogram an indication for amniocentesis?","volume":"83","author":"Bromley","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib46","first-page":"778","article-title":"Sonographically detected hyperechoic fetal bowel: significance and implications for pregnancy management","volume":"80","author":"Dicke","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13242.x","article-title":"Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: a prospective analysis of sixty consecutive cases","volume":"107","author":"Ghose","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.188.2.8327709","article-title":"Echogenic fetal bowel during the second trimester: clinical importance","volume":"188","author":"Nyberg","year":"1993","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5638","article-title":"Outcome of fetal echogenic bowel: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"41","author":"D\u2019Amico","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91365-3","article-title":"Isolated hyperechoic fetal bowel: significance and implications for management","volume":"173","author":"MacGregor","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c15064","article-title":"Role of second-trimester genetic sonography after Down syndrome screening","volume":"114","author":"Aagaard-Tillery","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3999","article-title":"Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center","volume":"32","author":"Mailath-Pokorny","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.10431","article-title":"Predicting the risk of cystic fibrosis with abnormal ultrasound signs of fetal bowel: results of a French molecular collaborative study based on 641 prospective cases","volume":"110","author":"Muller","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.10.017","article-title":"Isolated fetal echogenic bowel in a retrospective cohort: the role of infection screening","volume":"231","author":"Masini","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.09.052","article-title":"Ultrasound prediction of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection","volume":"198","author":"Guerra","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.042","article-title":"Diagnosis and antenatal management of congenital cytomegalovirus infection","volume":"214","author":"Hughes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00322.x","article-title":"Fetal echogenic bowel: a complex scenario","volume":"16","author":"Sepulveda","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.01.060","article-title":"Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel","volume":"212","author":"Ronin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F256","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2012-302017","article-title":"Outcome of infants presenting with echogenic bowel in the second trimester of pregnancy","volume":"98","author":"Buiter","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.151.6.1179","article-title":"Fetal choroid plexus cysts: prevalence, clinical significance, and sonographic appearance","volume":"151","author":"DeRoo","year":"1988","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib61","first-page":"232","article-title":"The isolated choroid plexus cyst","volume":"92","author":"Morcos","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2166","article-title":"Second trimester prenatal ultrasound for the detection of pregnancies at increased risk of trisomy 18 based on serum screening","volume":"29","author":"Cho","year":"2009","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90088-8","article-title":"Isolated fetal choroid plexus cysts and trisomy 18: a review and meta-analysis","volume":"172","author":"Gross","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970140804","article-title":"Isolated choroid plexus cysts\u2014the need for routine offer of karyotyping","volume":"14","author":"Walkinshaw","year":"1994","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2004.23.7.899","article-title":"Karyotyping of fetuses with isolated choroid plexus cysts is not justified in an unselected population","volume":"23","author":"Coco","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.100","article-title":"Evaluating the incidence and likelihood ratios for chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with common central nervous system malformations","volume":"199","author":"Goetzinger","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.012","article-title":"Isolated choroid plexus cyst or echogenic cardiac focus on prenatal ultrasound: is genetic amniocentesis indicated?","volume":"196","author":"Ouzounian","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib68","first-page":"869","article-title":"The second-trimester fetus with isolated choroid plexus cysts: a meta-analysis of risk of trisomies 18 and 21","volume":"93","author":"Yoder","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib69","first-page":"185","article-title":"Choroid plexus cysts in the fetus: a benign anatomic variant or pathologic entity? Report of 41 cases and review of the literature","volume":"72","author":"Chitkara","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1135","article-title":"Developmental outcome of children who had choroid plexus cysts detected prenatally","volume":"25","author":"Bernier","year":"2005","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00251-2","article-title":"Choroid plexus cysts: infant and early childhood developmental outcome","volume":"90","author":"Digiovanni","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211574","article-title":"Choroid plexus cysts do not affect fetal neurodevelopment","volume":"26","author":"DiPietro","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2757","article-title":"Isolated prenatal choroid plexus cysts do not affect child development","volume":"31","author":"DiPietro","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib74","first-page":"345","article-title":"Single umbilical artery. A statistical analysis of 237 autopsy cases and review of the literature","volume":"8","author":"Heifetz","year":"1984","journal-title":"Perspect Pediatr Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181da50ed","article-title":"Single umbilical artery and its associated findings","volume":"115","author":"Hua","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f0bc08","article-title":"Single umbilical artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Murphy-Kaulbeck","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7717","article-title":"Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype","volume":"36","author":"Dagklis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7711","article-title":"Isolated single umbilical artery: need for specialist fetal echocardiography?","volume":"36","author":"DeFigueiredo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02148-8","article-title":"Antenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: is fetal echocardiography warranted?","volume":"100","author":"Gossett","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1672","article-title":"Single umbilical artery and its siding in the second trimester of pregnancy: relation to chromosomal defects","volume":"27","author":"Lubusky","year":"2007","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1061504","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome in isolated single umbilical artery","volume":"25","author":"Bombrys","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-1326-3","article-title":"Is single umbilical artery an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality?","volume":"283","author":"Burshtein","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.11.007","article-title":"Isolated single umbilical artery: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome","volume":"184","author":"Mailath-Pokorny","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000158108.51397.f5","article-title":"Fetal growth assessment and neonatal birth weight in fetuses with an isolated single umbilical artery","volume":"105","author":"Predanic","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1061502","article-title":"Serial sonographic growth assessment in pregnancies complicated by an isolated single umbilical artery","volume":"25","author":"Wiegand","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000100","article-title":"Placental findings in singleton stillbirths","volume":"123","author":"Pinar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1148","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004408","article-title":"Indications for outpatient antenatal fetal surveillance: ACOG Committee Opinion Summary, number 828","volume":"137","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1998.17.12.765","article-title":"Frequency and nature of structural anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical arteries","volume":"17","author":"Chow","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2014.10.002","article-title":"Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system)","volume":"10","author":"Nguyen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199102000-00012","article-title":"Humeral shortening in second-trimester fetuses with Down syndrome","volume":"77","author":"Benacerraf","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90487-4","article-title":"Humerus and femur length shortening in the detection of Down\u2019s syndrome","volume":"168","author":"Nyberg","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00657-4","article-title":"Down syndrome screening using race-specific femur length","volume":"189","author":"Borgida","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.2.141","article-title":"Variation in fetal femur length with respect to maternal race","volume":"20","author":"Shipp","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2010.29.2.231","article-title":"Do race-specific definitions of short long bones improve the detection of down syndrome on second-trimester genetic sonograms?","volume":"29","author":"Harper","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2003.22.7.691","article-title":"Variation of fetal humeral length in second-trimester fetuses according to race and ethnicity","volume":"22","author":"Zelop","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib96","series-title":"Callen\u2019s ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology","article-title":"Skeletal dysplasias","author":"Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1935","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2012.31.12.1935","article-title":"Isolated short femur length on second-trimester sonography: a marker for fetal growth restriction and other adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"31","author":"Goetzinger","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2675","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.16.01086","article-title":"Risk of adverse outcomes in euploid pregnancies with isolated short fetal femur and humerus on second-trimester sonography","volume":"35","author":"Kaijomaa","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2531","article-title":"The history of the second-trimester sonographic markers for detecting fetal Down syndrome, and their current role in obstetric practice","volume":"30","author":"Benacerraf","year":"2010","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90588-5","article-title":"Sonographic diagnosis of Down syndrome in the second trimester","volume":"153","author":"Benacerraf","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4091","article-title":"Likelihood ratios for fetal trisomy 21 based on nasal bone length in the second trimester: how best to define hypoplasia?","volume":"30","author":"Cusick","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.031","article-title":"Defining nasal bone hypoplasia in second-trimester Down syndrome screening: does the use of multiples of the median improve screening efficacy?","volume":"197","author":"Odibo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19","article-title":"Nasal bone hypoplasia in trisomy 21 at 15-22 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"21","author":"Cicero","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7749","article-title":"Assessment of the ductus venosus, tricuspid blood flow and the nasal bone in second-trimester screening for trisomy 21","volume":"37","author":"Stressig","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01226.x","article-title":"A prospective cross-sectional study to define racial variation in fetal nasal bone length through ultrasound assessment at 18-20 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"50","author":"Mogra","year":"2010","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2002.21.12.1387","article-title":"Fetal nose bone length: a marker for Down syndrome in the second trimester","volume":"21","author":"Bromley","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13228","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of second-trimester nasal bone assessment in detection of fetuses with Down syndrome","volume":"43","author":"Moreno-Cid","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1200","article-title":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) update","volume":"224","author":"Norton","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079_bib109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937821007468?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937821007468?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:33:53Z","timestamp":1757590433000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937821007468"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"references-count":108,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937821007468"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #57: Evaluation and management of isolated soft ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in the second trimester","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}