{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,24]],"date-time":"2026-04-24T13:34:02Z","timestamp":1777037642577,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,28]],"date-time":"2023-09-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1695859200000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":362,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,19]],"date-time":"2022-04-19T11:23:35Z","timestamp":1650367415000},"page":"625.e1-625.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Uncertain fetal head engagement: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing digital exam with angle of progression"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"227","author":[{"given":"Jean-Baptiste","family":"Haumonte","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1542-504X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julie","family":"Blanc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6068-457X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pierre","family":"Castel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3462-1975","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pierre","family":"Mace","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pascal","family":"Auquier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Claude","family":"d\u2019Ercole","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0909-3202","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Florence","family":"Bretelle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00508.x","article-title":"Review of singleton fetal and neonatal deaths associated with cranial trauma and cephalic delivery during a national intrapartum-related confidential enquiry","volume":"112","author":"O'Mahony","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06341-3","article-title":"Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study","volume":"358","author":"Murphy","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib4","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric forceps. Washington (DC): The College; 1989. ACOG Committee Opinion 71."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x","article-title":"Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care","volume":"110","author":"Murphy","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14785","article-title":"Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial","volume":"46","author":"Popowski","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7521","article-title":"Measurement of fetal head descent using the \u2018angle of progression\u2019 on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise","volume":"35","author":"D\u00fcckelmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6329","article-title":"A\u00a0new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Barbera","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6294","article-title":"Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the \u2018angle of progression\u2019 predict the mode of delivery?","volume":"33","author":"Kalache","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.07.031","article-title":"Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"226","author":"Nassr","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249","article-title":"Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery","volume":"3","author":"Hadad","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045","article-title":"Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"221","author":"Dall\u2019Asta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12379","article-title":"Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery","volume":"41","author":"Ghi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13256","article-title":"Use of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of complicated operative forceps delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position","volume":"43","author":"Cuerva","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14951","article-title":"Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure","volume":"48","author":"Bultez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8944","article-title":"Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound","volume":"37","author":"Bamberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1064","article-title":"Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography","volume":"24","author":"Akmal","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor","volume":"19","author":"Sherer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.029","article-title":"Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor","volume":"191","author":"Chou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12422","article-title":"Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor","volume":"41","author":"Tutschek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009","article-title":"Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination","volume":"123","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001","article-title":"Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study","volume":"164","author":"Ramphul","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x","article-title":"A\u00a0study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent","volume":"118","author":"Tutschek","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib26","author":"Blondel"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000188","article-title":"Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success","volume":"123","author":"Aiken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 Mar;210:179\u2013193.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181744110","article-title":"Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies","volume":"111","author":"Daltveit","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1024","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13579","article-title":"Maternal outcome after complete uterine rupture","volume":"98","author":"Al-Zirqi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018_bib31","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937822002903?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937822002903?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T11:40:42Z","timestamp":1757590842000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937822002903"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937822002903"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Uncertain fetal head engagement: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing digital exam with angle of progression","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.018","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}