{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T20:28:32Z","timestamp":1792268912118,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,21]],"date-time":"2024-03-21T23:18:52Z","timestamp":1711063132000},"page":"233.e1-233.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"231","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4304-6773","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Liselot P.","family":"Wagenaar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wouter L.J.","family":"van Vugt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aleida G.","family":"Huppelschoten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Celine M.","family":"Radder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Louisette W.","family":"Peters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steven","family":"Weyers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steffi","family":"van Wessel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benedictus C.","family":"Schoot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tjalina W.O.","family":"Hamerlynck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huib A.","family":"van Vliet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.09.001","article-title":"Operative hysteroscopy to remove retained products of conception: novel treatment of an old problem","volume":"18","author":"Golan","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.04.024","article-title":"An alternative approach for removal of placental remnants: hysteroscopic morcellation","volume":"20","author":"Hamerlynck","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.10.028","article-title":"Surgical and reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic removal of retained products of Conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"Vitale","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib4","first-page":"CD007223","article-title":"Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage","volume":"1","author":"Kim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13455","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: a systematic review","volume":"62","author":"Taylor","year":"2022","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.08.003","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage","volume":"18","author":"Rein","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.09.021","article-title":"Long-term complications and reproductive outcome after the management of retained products of conception: a systematic review","volume":"105","author":"Hooker","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1590\/S1516-31802007000500002","article-title":"Prevalence of uterine synechia after abortion evacuation curettage","volume":"125","author":"Salzani","year":"2007","journal-title":"Sao Paulo Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60129-6","article-title":"Intrauterine adhesions after conservative and surgical management of spontaneous abortion","volume":"9","author":"Tam","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60577-4","article-title":"Hysteroscopy may be the method of choice for management of residual trophoblastic tissue","volume":"8","author":"Cohen","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138068","article-title":"Incidence of post-abortion intra-uterine adhesions evaluated by hysteroscopy\u2014a prospective study","volume":"8","author":"Friedler","year":"1993","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1097\/01.grf.0000211948.36465.a6","article-title":"Septums and synechiae: approaches to surgical correction","volume":"49","author":"Fedele","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)46268-0","article-title":"Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal","volume":"37","author":"Schenker","year":"1982","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.04.013","article-title":"Fertility after treatment of Asherman\u2019s syndrome stage 3 and 4","volume":"13","author":"Fernandez","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.11.020","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: meta-analysis and literature review","volume":"173","author":"Smorgick","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib16","first-page":"26","article-title":"Managing residual trophoblastic tissue. Hysteroscopy for directing curettage","volume":"42","author":"Goldenberg","year":"1997","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.08.956","article-title":"Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial","volume":"120","author":"Wagenaar","year":"2023","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.05.003","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of reproductive outcomes following hysteroscopic management versus dilatation and curettage of retained products of conception","volume":"127","author":"Ben-Ami","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eurox.2023.100230","article-title":"Operative hysteroscopy versus ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration for removal of retained products of conception: a prospective cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Wagenaar","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009","article-title":"International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009","volume":"92","author":"Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.04.011","article-title":"Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue and reproductive outcome: a pilot study","volume":"16","author":"Faivre","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2023.3415","article-title":"Operative hysteroscopy vs vacuum aspiration for incomplete spontaneous abortion: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"329","author":"Huchon","year":"2023","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.07.010","article-title":"Reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic resection of retained products of conception","volume":"23","author":"Ikhena","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.07.016","article-title":"Reproductive and obstetric outcomes after hysteroscopic removal of retained products of Conception","volume":"27","author":"van Wessel","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S218933","article-title":"Retained placenta after vaginal delivery: risk factors and management","volume":"11","author":"Perlman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.09.023","article-title":"[Epidemiology of post-partum haemorrhage]","volume":"43","author":"Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.333125177","article-title":"Physiologic, histologic, and imaging features of retained products of conception","volume":"33","author":"Sellmyer","year":"2013","journal-title":"RadioGraphics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.01.013","article-title":"Postpartum retained products of conception: retrospective analysis of the association with third stage of labor placental complications","volume":"234","author":"Smorgick","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2008.27.3.357","article-title":"Occurrence and outcome of residual trophoblastic tissue: a prospective study","volume":"27","author":"van den Bosch","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2021.103870","article-title":"A\u00a0conceptual framework for external validity","volume":"121","author":"Averitt","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Biomed Inform"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-015-1023-4","article-title":"A\u00a0literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results","volume":"16","author":"Kennedy-Martin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyp174","article-title":"How to assess the external validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach","volume":"39","author":"Dekkers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2007.126847","article-title":"The importance of external validity","volume":"98","author":"Steckler","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mayocp.2013.07.012","article-title":"The necessity for clinical reasoning in the era of evidence-based medicine","volume":"88","author":"Sniderman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pctr.0010009","article-title":"Factors that can affect the external validity of randomised controlled trials","volume":"1","author":"Rothwell","year":"2006","journal-title":"PLoS Clin Trials"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937824004460?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937824004460?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,14]],"date-time":"2024-11-14T21:11:42Z","timestamp":1731618702000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937824004460"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937824004460"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}