{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T02:31:58Z","timestamp":1793241118852,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,31]],"date-time":"2025-01-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738281600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,21]],"date-time":"2025-05-21T07:19:57Z","timestamp":1747811997000},"page":"S616-S626.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"special_numbering":"S","title":["An Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery Classification System \u2013 a prospective eighteen year longitudinal cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"233","author":[{"given":"Michael","family":"Robson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gillian A.","family":"Corbett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J\u00f8rg","family":"Kessler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martina","family":"Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kim","family":"Ryan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fionnuala","family":"Byrne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Declan P.","family":"Keane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ global health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539501000122","article-title":"Classification of caesarean sections","volume":"12","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909013275","article-title":"Changes in frequency and indications for cesarean section in Norway 1967-1984","volume":"68","author":"Borthen","year":"1989","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.217","article-title":"Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway","volume":"188","author":"Kol\u00e5s","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e820","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(18)30319-X","article-title":"Use of indications to identify appropriate caesarean section rates","volume":"6","author":"Robson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib6","first-page":"574","article-title":"Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?","volume":"84","author":"Gregory","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.05.026","article-title":"The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking","volume":"219","author":"Robson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13619","article-title":"A global reference for CS at health facilities? Yes, but there is work to do","volume":"123","author":"Robson","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1454","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16679","article-title":"Known knowns, unknown unknowns and everything in-between - the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS)","volume":"128","author":"Robson","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0014566","article-title":"Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Torloni","year":"2011","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib11","first-page":"297","article-title":"Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate","volume":"27","author":"Robson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Best practice & research"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib12","first-page":"S23","article-title":"Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery","volume":"131","author":"Robson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13267","article-title":"The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) - a common starting point for more detailed analysis","volume":"122","author":"Robson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13526","article-title":"Section WWGoC. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates","volume":"123","author":"Betran","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.08.001","article-title":"Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries","volume":"135","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib16","first-page":"129","article-title":"EBCOG position statement on caesarean section in Europe","volume":"219","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.11.671","article-title":"413: Classification of intrapartum cesarean delivery: a starting point for more detailed analysis","volume":"216","author":"Campbell","year":"2017","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.462","article-title":"Classification of caesarean sections in spontaneously labouring, single cephalic, nulliparous women at greater then 36 weeks (SCNT)","volume":"193","author":"Ravikumar","year":"2005","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib19","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2005. 2005."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib20","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2006. 2006."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib21","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2007. 2007."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib22","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2008. 2008."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib23","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2009. 2009."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib24","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2010. 2010."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib25","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2011. 2011."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib26","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2012. 2012."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib27","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2013. 2013."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib28","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2014. 2014."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib29","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2015. 2015."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib30","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2016. 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib31","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2017. 2017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib32","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2018. 2018."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib33","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2019. 2019."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib34","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2020. 2020."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib35","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2021. 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib36","unstructured":"NMH. National Maternity Hospital: Annual Clinical Report 2022. 2022."},{"issue":"5872","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.3.5872.135","article-title":"Active management of labour","volume":"3","author":"O'Driscoll","year":"1973","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2021.10.003","article-title":"Management of poor progress in labour","volume":"31","author":"O'Riordan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-68517-1","article-title":"Variations in the use of oxytocin for augmentation of labour in Sweden: a population-based cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Johnson","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.07.054","article-title":"Oxytocin is not associated with postpartum hemorrhage in labor augmentation in a retrospective cohort study in the United States","volume":"230","author":"Zhu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1543","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13572","article-title":"Oxytocin should not be used to augment labour: AGAINST: the need for oxytocin is greatest in nulliparous women","volume":"122","author":"Robson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1543","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13571","article-title":"Oxytocin should not be used to augment labour: FOR: there is too much risk for too little benefit","volume":"122","author":"Steer","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-023-02751-4","article-title":"Effects of the WHO Labour Care Guide on cesarean section in India: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial","volume":"30","author":"Vogel","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-024-02812-2","article-title":"Delivering high-quality childbirth care","volume":"30","author":"Fernandez-Turienzo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1095","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.10.038","article-title":"The REDUCED trial: a cluster randomized trial for REDucing the utilization of CEsarean delivery for dystocia","volume":"228","author":"Wood","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.10.015","article-title":"Randomized controlled trials: not always the \"gold standard\" for evidence in obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"230","author":"Oyelese","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14774","article-title":"Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review","volume":"125","author":"Boatin","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pgph.0002877","article-title":"Global disparities in caesarean section rates: Why indication-based metrics are needed","volume":"4","author":"Zaigham","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLOS Glob Public Health"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S994","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.02.025","article-title":"A wider agreement is needed on basic intrapartum concepts","volume":"228","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S535","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.11.870","article-title":"856: Verifying a previously described classification system for intrapartum cesarean delivery in a national Norwegian study","author":"Kessler","year":"2020","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyJanuary"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17833","article-title":"Stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification system: A cross-sectional registry of 80 663 births from 16 hospital in sub-Saharan Africa","author":"Hanson","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h2410","article-title":"Time to consider the risks of caesarean delivery for long term child health","volume":"350","author":"Blustein","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.10.003","article-title":"Latent phase duration and associated outcomes: a contemporary, population-based observational study","volume":"228","author":"Tilden","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1063","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.11.1299","article-title":"New insights on labor progression: a systematic review","volume":"228","author":"He","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1017","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.029","article-title":"The latent phase of labor","volume":"228","author":"Cohen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.12.269","article-title":"The active phase of labor","volume":"228","author":"Friedman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.10.011","article-title":"Dysfunctional labor and delivery: adverse effects on offspring","volume":"228","author":"Friedman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.09.003","article-title":"Assessment of uterine contractions in labor and delivery","volume":"228","author":"Rosen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.10.039","article-title":"Monitoring uterine contractions during labor: current challenges and future directions","volume":"228","author":"Young","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.12.005","article-title":"The evolution of the labor curve and its implications for clinical practice: the relationship between cervical dilation, station, and time during labor","volume":"228","author":"Hamilton","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.035","article-title":"Elevated amniotic fluid lactate predicts labor disorders and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women at term","volume":"213","author":"Murphy","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.11.570","article-title":"545 Complement 4a (C4a) as a potential biomarker for dystocia in labour","author":"O'Riordan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937825000663?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937825000663?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T01:53:58Z","timestamp":1793238838000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937825000663"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937825000663"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"An Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery Classification System \u2013 a prospective eighteen year longitudinal cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.033","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}