{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T07:23:53Z","timestamp":1787383433441,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775001600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775001600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763683200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,22]],"date-time":"2025-11-22T07:38:08Z","timestamp":1763797088000},"page":"1007-1014","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["A critical review of placental function evaluation near term using Doppler ratios"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"234","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8706-3925","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Viola","family":"Seravalli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kurt","family":"Hecher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmet A.","family":"Baschat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1055","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90783-7","article-title":"Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep","volume":"161","author":"Morrow","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.070430","article-title":"Use of uterine artery doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis","volume":"178","author":"Cnossen","year":"2008","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh037","article-title":"Decreased endovascular trophoblast invasion in first trimester pregnancies with high-resistance uterine artery doppler indices","volume":"19","author":"Prefumo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb08656.x","article-title":"Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus","volume":"93","author":"Wladimiroff","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib5","series-title":"High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options","first-page":"225","article-title":"Fetal growth disorders","author":"Baschat","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-5629(87)90166-9","article-title":"Exploration of the fetal cerebral blood flow by duplex Doppler--linear array system in normal and pathological pregnancies","volume":"13","author":"Arbeille","year":"1987","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","article-title":"Cerebral-umbilical doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"79","author":"Gramellini","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02040266.x","article-title":"Potential for diagnosing imminent risk to appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses by doppler sonographic examination of umbilical and cerebral arterial blood flow","volume":"2","author":"Hecher","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08299.x","article-title":"Doppler fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or delivery of a small for gestational age baby: 2. Longitudinal analysis","volume":"106","author":"Harrington","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-5629(95)00025-M","article-title":"Assessment of the fetal PO2 changes by cerebral and umbilical doppler on lamb fetuses during acute hypoxia","volume":"21","author":"Arbeille","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","article-title":"Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23698","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): use of doppler velocimetry in obstetrics","volume":"58","author":"Bhide","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22004","article-title":"Ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility indices in assessment of fetal risk: numerator and denominator matter","volume":"56","author":"Wolf","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.001","article-title":"Is middle cerebral artery doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction?","volume":"216","author":"Stampalija","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13190","article-title":"Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE)","volume":"42","author":"Lees","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21985","article-title":"Umbilicocerebral ratio: potential implications of inversing the cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"56","author":"Kalafat","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00882.x","article-title":"Morphometric placental villous and vascular abnormalities in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia with and without fetal growth restriction","volume":"113","author":"Egbor","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2011.098","article-title":"Placental lesions associated with maternal underperfusion are more frequent in early-onset than in late-onset preeclampsia","volume":"39","author":"Ogge","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19117","article-title":"Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"52","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","article-title":"Fetal brain doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"117","author":"Cruz-Martinez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2005.24.9.1223","article-title":"Cerebroplacental doppler ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: evaluating the impact of using gestational age-specific reference values","volume":"24","author":"Odibo","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","article-title":"Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"221","author":"Akolekar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17770","article-title":"Doppler ultrasound of umbilical and middle cerebral artery in third trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses to decide on timing of delivery for suspected fetal growth restriction: a cohort with nested RCT (DRIGITAT)","volume":"131","author":"Marijnen","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22125","article-title":"Fetal cerebral doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study","volume":"56","author":"Stampalija","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","article-title":"Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?","volume":"216","author":"Khalil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15729","article-title":"Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","article-title":"Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","article-title":"Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study","volume":"208","author":"Prior","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14647","article-title":"Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"45","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","article-title":"The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses","volume":"213","author":"DeVore","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2017.02.006","article-title":"Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"54","author":"Dunn","year":"2017","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)02228-6","article-title":"Term planned delivery based on fetal growth assessment with or without the cerebroplacental ratio in low-risk pregnancies (RATIO37): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"403","author":"Rial-Crestelo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.003","article-title":"Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"218","author":"Figueras","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23615","article-title":"Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"58","author":"Wolf","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-055543","article-title":"Perinatal and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome in late preterm fetal compromise: the TRUFFLE 2 randomised trial protocol","volume":"12","author":"Mylrea-Foley","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18815","article-title":"Severe fetal growth restriction at 26-32 weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study","volume":"50","author":"Bilardo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.003","article-title":"Role of uteroplacental and fetal doppler in identifying fetal growth restriction at term","volume":"38","author":"Khalil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2015.01.005","article-title":"A uniform management approach to optimize outcome in fetal growth restriction","volume":"42","author":"Seravalli","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"Lees","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e16","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004251","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction: ACOG practice bulletin, number 227","volume":"137","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010","article-title":"Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces clinical guideline number 3, April 2012)","volume":"223","author":"Martins","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","article-title":"Changes in fetal doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term","volume":"43","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14842","article-title":"Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery doppler at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"46","author":"Akolekar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14822","article-title":"Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery doppler at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"45","author":"Bakalis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.02.034","article-title":"Prelabor screening at term using the cerebroplacental ratio and placental growth factor: a pragmatic randomized open-label phase 2 trial","volume":"223","author":"Sherrell","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","article-title":"The cerebroplacental doppler ratio revisited","volume":"21","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4088","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements","volume":"30","author":"Ebbing","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.916680","article-title":"Doppler reference values of the fetal vertebral and middle cerebral arteries, at 19-41 weeks gestation","volume":"28","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17458","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight","volume":"51","author":"Sirico","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20102","article-title":"Reference ranges for doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review","volume":"53","author":"Oros","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937825008683?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937825008683?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T06:40:18Z","timestamp":1787380818000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937825008683"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937825008683"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A critical review of placental function evaluation near term using Doppler ratios","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.11.032","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}